Fehring Daniel J, Samandra Ranshikha, Rosa Marcello G, Mansouri Farshad A
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Aug 13;13:282. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00282. eCollection 2019.
In our daily life, we frequently need to make decisions between competing behavioral options while we are exposed to various contextual factors containing emotional/social information. We examined how changes in emotional/arousal state influence resolving conflict between behavioral rules. Visual stimuli with emotional content (positive, negative and neutral) and music (High/Low tempo), which could potentially alter emotional/arousal states, were included in the task context while participants performed the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). The WCST requires the application of abstract matching rules, to resolve conflict between competing behavioral options. We found that conflict influenced both accuracy and response time (RT) in implementing rules. Measuring event-related autonomic responses indicated that these behavioral effects were accompanied by concomitant alterations in arousal levels. Performance in the WCST was modulated by the emotional content of visual stimuli and appeared as a faster response and higher accuracy when trials commenced with negative emotional stimuli. These effects were dependent on the level of conflict but were not accompanied by changes in arousal levels. Here, we report that visual stimuli with emotional content influence conflict processing without trial-by-trial changes in arousal level. Our findings indicate intricate interactions between emotional context and various aspects of executive control such as conflict resolution and suggest that these interactions are not necessarily mediated through alterations in arousal level.
在日常生活中,当我们暴露于包含情感/社会信息的各种情境因素时,经常需要在相互竞争的行为选项之间做出决定。我们研究了情绪/唤醒状态的变化如何影响行为规则之间冲突的解决。在参与者执行威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)时,任务情境中包含了带有情感内容(积极、消极和中性)的视觉刺激以及音乐(高/低节奏),这些可能会改变情绪/唤醒状态。WCST要求应用抽象匹配规则,以解决相互竞争的行为选项之间的冲突。我们发现冲突会影响执行规则时的准确性和反应时间(RT)。测量与事件相关的自主反应表明,这些行为效应伴随着唤醒水平的相应变化。WCST的表现受到视觉刺激情感内容的调节,当试验以消极情感刺激开始时,表现为更快的反应和更高的准确性。这些效应取决于冲突水平,但不伴随着唤醒水平的变化。在此,我们报告带有情感内容的视觉刺激会影响冲突处理,而不会在每次试验中引起唤醒水平的变化。我们的研究结果表明情感情境与执行控制的各个方面(如冲突解决)之间存在复杂的相互作用,并表明这些相互作用不一定通过唤醒水平的改变来介导。