Reeves Jonathan P, Knight Andrew T, Strong Emily A, Heng Victor, Neale Chris, Cromie Ruth, Vercammen Ans
Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (WWT), Slimbridge, United Kingdom.
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 13;10:1840. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01840. eCollection 2019.
Improved nature provision in urban environments offers great potential for achieving both biodiversity conservation and public health objectives. Yet there are few experimental studies that address links between specific natural environments and physiological and/or psychological changes that could contribute to the health and wellbeing co-benefits of urban nature. In addition, relative to green space, the salutogenic impact of aquatic environments are understudied. Here, we present a feasibility study examining the use of low-cost wearable technology to quantify the psychophysiological effects of short-term exposure to urban wetlands. The study took place at the WWT London Wetland Centre, which is characterized by its contrasting biodiverse wetland habitat and surrounding urban setting. Thirty-six healthy participants experienced counterbalanced exposures to an indoor space, a wetland, an urban site. We continuously recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) data and real-time physiological stress responses; with additional monitoring of post-exposure self-reported mood states. We found a significant effect of site on mean resting heart rate (HR), with increased HR in the urban setting, although this was only observed in participants with pre-existing high stress. We found no significant differences in other measures of physiological stress responses (heart rate variability and electrodermal activity). The EEG data showed modulation of high beta band activity only in the wetland setting, potentially related to changes in attention. However, the EEG findings were confounded by low quality signals and artifacts caused by movement and environmental interference. Assessments of self-reported mood states demonstrated an increase in positive feelings in the wetland setting. A pronounced decrease in negative feelings in the wetland setting was observed in stressed individuals only. Our results suggest that pre-existing stress levels may be an important modulator of the salutogenic effect of blue-green space. We provide partial support for the hypothesis that exposure to blue-green space promotes stress recovery and for the use of low-cost psychophysiological measurements to quantify the potential stress-reducing effects of blue-green space exposure in urban dwellers. Further technological refinement is required for this approach to become a viable tool to support evidence-based decision-making for public health and green/blue space provision.
改善城市环境中的自然供给对于实现生物多样性保护和公共卫生目标具有巨大潜力。然而,很少有实验研究探讨特定自然环境与生理和/或心理变化之间的联系,而这些变化可能有助于实现城市自然对健康和福祉的协同效益。此外,相对于绿地,水生环境的健康促进作用研究较少。在此,我们开展了一项可行性研究,考察使用低成本可穿戴技术来量化短期接触城市湿地对心理生理的影响。该研究在伦敦野生水禽与湿地信托中心进行,其特点是拥有生物多样性丰富的湿地栖息地与周围城市环境形成鲜明对比。36名健康参与者经历了在室内空间、湿地、城市地点的平衡暴露。我们持续记录脑电图(EEG)数据和实时生理应激反应;并额外监测暴露后自我报告的情绪状态。我们发现地点对平均静息心率(HR)有显著影响,在城市环境中HR升高,不过这仅在已有高压力的参与者中观察到。我们在生理应激反应的其他指标(心率变异性和皮肤电活动)上未发现显著差异。EEG数据显示仅在湿地环境中高β波段活动有调制,可能与注意力变化有关。然而,EEG结果受到低质量信号以及由运动和环境干扰导致的伪迹的混淆。自我报告情绪状态的评估表明在湿地环境中积极情绪增加。仅在有压力的个体中观察到湿地环境中消极情绪显著下降。我们的结果表明,已有压力水平可能是蓝绿空间健康促进作用的重要调节因素。我们部分支持以下假设:接触蓝绿空间可促进压力恢复,以及使用低成本心理生理测量方法来量化城市居民接触蓝绿空间潜在的减压效果。要使这种方法成为支持基于证据的公共卫生决策和绿色/蓝色空间供给的可行工具,还需要进一步的技术改进。