• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粘合剂和自粘树脂粘结剂与三种市售复合核心堆积材料的剪切粘结强度比较评估：一项研究。

Comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of adhesive and self-adhesive resin luting agents to three commercially available composite core build-up materials: An study.

作者信息

Terni Prachiti M, Nadgere Jyoti B, Ram Sabita M, Shah Naisargi P, Mahadevan Janani

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, MGM Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Prosthodontics, Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Jul-Sep;19(3):255-260. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_84_19.

DOI:10.4103/jips.jips_84_19
PMID:31462865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6685342/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of adhesive and self-adhesive resin luting agents (RLAs) to three commercially available composite core build-up materials (CBMs).

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Comparative - study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty samples, 20 each of self-cure (Incore, Medicept: Group I), light cure (Light-Core, Bisco: Group II), and dual cure (LuxaCore Z-Dual, DMG America: Group III) composite CBMs were made in the lower mold space of a customized stainless steel jig. They were further subdivided into subgroups A and B for bonding with the adhesive (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) and self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE) RLAs respectively. For specimens in subgroup A, the bonding agent (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, 3M ESPE) was rubbed onto the surface for 20 s prior to bonding with the adhesive RLA. For specimens in subgroup B, no pretreatment of the surface was carried out. The CBM-luting agent sample was tested for the shear bond strength in a universal testing machine.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

ANOVA, Tukey's multiple comparison, and independent -test.

RESULTS

Adhesive RLA showed the highest shear bond strength to light cured composite CBM. Self-adhesive RLA showed the highest shear bond strength to dual-cured composite CBM. Adhesive RLA showed higher shear bond strength to all three composite CBMs as compared to the self-adhesive luting agent. This difference was statistically significant for the self-cure and light cure composite CBMs.

CONCLUSION

Adhesive RLA showed greater shear bond strengths to all the three groups of composite CBMs as compared to self-adhesive RLA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估粘结性树脂粘结剂和自粘结性树脂粘结剂（RLAs）与三种市售复合树脂核材料（CBMs）的剪切粘结强度。

设置与设计

对比研究。

材料与方法

在定制的不锈钢夹具的下模腔中制作60个样本，自固化（Incore，Medicept：第一组）、光固化（Light-Core，Bisco：第二组）和双重固化（LuxaCore Z-Dual，DMG America：第三组）复合树脂CBM各20个。它们进一步细分为A组和B组，分别与粘结性（RelyX Ultimate，3M ESPE）和自粘结性（RelyX Unicem，3M ESPE）RLAs粘结。对于A组样本，在与粘结性RLA粘结之前，将粘结剂（Scotchbond Universal Adhesive，3M ESPE）涂擦在表面20秒。对于B组样本，未进行表面预处理。在万能试验机上测试CBM-粘结剂样本的剪切粘结强度。

统计分析方法

方差分析、Tukey多重比较和独立检验。

结果

粘结性RLA对光固化复合树脂CBM的剪切粘结强度最高。自粘结性RLA对双重固化复合树脂CBM的剪切粘结强度最高。与自粘结性粘结剂相比，粘结性RLA对所有三种复合树脂CBM的剪切粘结强度更高。这种差异在自固化和光固化复合树脂CBM中具有统计学意义。

结论

与自粘结性RLA相比，粘结性RLA对所有三组复合树脂CBM的剪切粘结强度更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/d7a5e92d1fad/JIPS-19-255-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/bd3669cf3427/JIPS-19-255-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/27f9c34bec3c/JIPS-19-255-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/bef8c89b7f77/JIPS-19-255-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/33dd21c628f1/JIPS-19-255-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/c228a53e1bd3/JIPS-19-255-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/8929764ce4f0/JIPS-19-255-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/8e52b3f66101/JIPS-19-255-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/853ef15620d7/JIPS-19-255-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/c1f8ff92cf98/JIPS-19-255-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/d7a5e92d1fad/JIPS-19-255-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/bd3669cf3427/JIPS-19-255-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/27f9c34bec3c/JIPS-19-255-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/bef8c89b7f77/JIPS-19-255-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/33dd21c628f1/JIPS-19-255-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/c228a53e1bd3/JIPS-19-255-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/8929764ce4f0/JIPS-19-255-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/8e52b3f66101/JIPS-19-255-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/853ef15620d7/JIPS-19-255-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/c1f8ff92cf98/JIPS-19-255-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/815b/6685342/d7a5e92d1fad/JIPS-19-255-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the shear bond strength of adhesive and self-adhesive resin luting agents to three commercially available composite core build-up materials: An study.粘合剂和自粘树脂粘结剂与三种市售复合核心堆积材料的剪切粘结强度比较评估：一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Jul-Sep;19(3):255-260. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_84_19.
2
Immediate and long-term microshear bond strength of resin-based cements to core build-up materials.树脂类水门汀与核修复材料的即刻和长期微剪切粘结强度
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Oct 1;13(10):e1030-e1037. doi: 10.4317/jced.58515. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.粘结性粘固剂对牙釉质和牙本质的粘结效果。
Dent Mater. 2007 Jan;23(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
4
Shear bond strength between nickel-chromium and human dentine using a dual-cure, self-adhesive universal resin luting agent.使用双固化自粘通用树脂粘结剂时镍铬合金与人类牙本质之间的剪切粘结强度
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2008 Jun;16(2):85-8.
5
An In Vitro Comparison of Shear Bond Strength for Heated Composite Resin With Three Conventional Luting Cements.加热复合树脂与三种传统粘结水门汀剪切粘结强度的体外比较
Cureus. 2023 Oct 16;15(10):e47110. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47110. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional Resin Cement and Self-adhesive Resin Cement bonded to Lithium Disilicate: An in vitro Study.传统树脂水门汀和自粘树脂水门汀与二硅酸锂粘结的剪切粘结强度比较：一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):881-886. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2143.
7
Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents.两种硅烷偶联剂、一种粘结剂以及热循环对用两种树脂粘结剂粘结的CAD/CAM复合材料粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Feb;85(2):184-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113628.
8
Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia.表面处理和模拟老化对粘接剂与氧化锆粘接强度的影响。
Quintessence Int. 2007 Oct;38(9):745-53.
9
Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to composite submitted to different surface pretreatments.不同表面预处理下自粘性树脂水门汀与复合材料的粘结强度
Restor Dent Endod. 2014 Feb;39(1):12-6. doi: 10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.12. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
10
Dentin and enamel bond strengths of dual-cure composite luting agents used with dual-cure dental adhesives.与双固化牙科粘合剂一起使用的双固化复合粘结剂的牙本质和牙釉质粘结强度。
J Dent. 2009 Jan;37(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.006. Epub 2008 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of a zirconia primer on the shear bond strength of Y-TZP ceramic to three different core materials by using a self-adhesive resin cement.使用自粘树脂水门汀时，氧化锆底漆对Y-TZP陶瓷与三种不同核材料的剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Apr-Jun;19(2):134-140. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_348_18.
2
Computer-aided design finite element modeling of different approaches to rehabilitate endodontically treated teeth.根管治疗后牙齿修复不同方法的计算机辅助设计有限元建模
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Oct-Dec;18(4):329-335. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_168_18.
3
Comparison of temperature change among different adhesive resin cement during polymerization process.
不同粘接树脂水门汀聚合过程中温度变化的比较。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Apr-Jun;17(2):183-188. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_327_16.
4
Effect of indirect composite treatment microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements.间接复合治疗对自粘树脂水门汀微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Feb 1;8(1):e14-21. doi: 10.4317/jced.52754. eCollection 2016 Feb.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.乳酸缓冲溶液中不同核桩材料粘结水门汀抗剪粘结强度的比较评价
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Aug;9(8):ZC84-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12333.6372. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
6
Comparative study of mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials.直接核桩修复材料力学性能的比较研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar;6(1):16-20. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.149285.
7
Comparative evaluation of bond strengths of different core materials with various luting agents used for cast crown restorations.不同核材料与用于铸造冠修复的各种粘结剂的粘结强度比较评估。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2012 Sep;12(3):168-74. doi: 10.1007/s13191-012-0127-8. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
8
Comparison of mechanical properties of five commercial dental core build-up materials.五种市售牙科核材料的力学性能比较。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Jan;34(1):62-3, 65-8.
9
In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.三种自粘接树脂水门汀和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀与各种义齿基托材料的体外剪切粘结强度。
Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):186-96. doi: 10.2341/11-317-L. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
10
Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations.自粘接树脂水门汀——化学、性能与临床相关考量。
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Apr;38(4):295-314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x. Epub 2010 Dec 6.