The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, China; School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China.
The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, China; School of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China.
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105268. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105268. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
Single-vehicle (SV) and multi-vehicle (MV) crashes have been recognized as differing in spatial distribution and influencing factors, but little consideration has been given to these differences as related to hotspot identification. For the purpose of better hotspot identification, this study aims to analyze influencing factors of SV and MV crashes and to explore the consistency between SV and MV hotspots. Crash data, roadway geometric design features, and traffic characteristics were collected along the two directions of a 45-km freeway section in Shanghai, China. Univariate negative binomial conditional autoregressive (NB-CAR) and bivariate negative binomial spatial conditional autoregressive (BNB-CAR) models were developed to analyze the influencing factors and specifically address (1) site correlation between SV and MV crashes within the same freeway segment, and (2) spatial correlation among different freeway segments within the same direction. The modeling results showed substantial differences in the significant factors that influence SV and MV crashes, including both roadway geometric features and traffic operational factors. A non-negligible site correlation was found between SV and MV crashes. Taking into account the site correlation, the BNB-CAR model outperformed the NB-CAR model in terms of parameter estimation and model fitting. For hotspot identification, potential for safety improvement based on the empirical Bayes method was adopted to handle the crash fluctuation problem. Substantial inconsistency was found between SV and MV hotspots despite the site correlation: in the top ten hotspots, no hotspot was shared by the two crash types. This result highlights the importance of differentiating SV and MV crashes when identifying hotspots, providing insight into freeway safety analysis.
单车(SV)和多车(MV)事故在空间分布和影响因素方面已被公认为存在差异,但在热点识别方面,很少考虑这些差异。为了更好地进行热点识别,本研究旨在分析 SV 和 MV 事故的影响因素,并探讨 SV 和 MV 热点之间的一致性。在上海市一段 45 公里长的高速公路的两个方向上,收集了碰撞数据、道路几何设计特征和交通特征。采用单变量负二项条件自回归(NB-CAR)和双变量负二项空间条件自回归(BNB-CAR)模型来分析影响因素,并特别关注(1)同一高速公路段内 SV 和 MV 碰撞之间的地点相关性,以及(2)同一方向上不同高速公路段之间的空间相关性。建模结果表明,影响 SV 和 MV 碰撞的显著因素存在显著差异,包括道路几何特征和交通运行因素。在 SV 和 MV 碰撞之间发现了不可忽视的地点相关性。考虑到地点相关性,BNB-CAR 模型在参数估计和模型拟合方面优于 NB-CAR 模型。对于热点识别,采用经验贝叶斯方法的安全改进潜力来处理碰撞波动问题。尽管存在地点相关性,但在 SV 和 MV 热点之间发现了实质性的不一致:在十大热点中,两种碰撞类型没有一个热点是共有的。这一结果强调了在识别热点时区分 SV 和 MV 碰撞的重要性,为高速公路安全分析提供了新的视角。