Mobilization practices for patients with burn injury in critical care.

PURPOSE

Patients with burn usually undergo prolonged hospitalization due partially to the treatment of wounds and scars. Although the benefits of early mobilization are well-known in critical care patients, there are a lack of studies reporting mobilization practices and functional status for patients with burn.

MATERIALS

Clinical and physiotherapy data were daily collected, including ICU mobility scale (IMS) and reported barriers to mobilization therapy during a one-year period. At hospital discharge, the 6-min walking test (6MWT), Medical Research Council scale (MRCS) and handgrip strength test were applied to evaluate the patients' functionality.

RESULTS

Of the 74 patients admitted, 66% were placed on mechanical ventilation (MV). Mobilization therapy was administered in 67.2% of physiotherapy sessions, with passive mobilization being the most prevalent (53.2%) followed by active in-bed exercises (13.6%). Reported barriers for mobilization included hemodynamic instability followed by limited time for assistance. At hospital discharge, the 6MWD was 270(136) meters. A positive correlation was found between handgrip evaluation and 6MWD and a negative correlation with hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Mobilization therapy of patients with burns in the ICU was characterized by a low mobility level during MV with a low functional status at hospital discharge.