• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于对淋巴结阳性上尿路尿路上皮癌生存结局进行分层的淋巴结密度

Lymph node density for stratification of survival outcomes with node positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

作者信息

Raza Syed Johar, Miller Caleb, May Allison, Davaro Facundo, Siddiqui Sameer Ahmed, Hamilton Zachary

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(4):9852-9858.

PMID:31469641
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of lymph node density (LND) as a predictor of survival outcomes has been studied with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Similar results can be postulated to upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This study aims to determine the overall survival of patients with lymph node positive UTUC based on LND, utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was derived from NCDB Participant User Kidney Dataset using the histology code 'transitional cell carcinoma', utilizing pN+ patients from 2004-2015. LND was calculated as number of positive nodes divided by total number of nodes removed. Patients were stratified by traditional AJCC pN stage and compared to LND groups (< 30%, ≥ 30%). Primary outcome was overall survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 2049 patients were identified (pN1 = 1022, pN2 = 1027; LND < 30% = 370, ≥ 30% = 1679). Mean LND was 71%. Cox regression for mortality using pN stage was not significant (p = 0.11); however, Cox regression for mortality using LND group noted significantly worsened survival with LND ≥ 30% (HR 1.54, p = 0.001). Kaplan Meier analysis for overall survival at 2 years showed no difference between pN1 and pN2 stages (35.3% versus 34.1%; log rank p = 0.37). Kaplan Meier analysis for overall survival at 2 years revealed significant difference between LND groups (LND < 30%, 47.3% versus LND ≥ 30%, 32.0%; log rank p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LND provides improved prognostic information regarding overall survival, compared to traditional AJCC pN staging. Future studies need to evaluate LND to improve prognostic understanding of lymph node positive UTUC.

摘要

引言

淋巴结密度(LND)作为生存结果预测指标已在膀胱尿路上皮癌中进行了研究。上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)可能会有类似结果。本研究旨在利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)确定基于LND的淋巴结阳性UTUC患者的总生存期。

材料与方法

数据来自NCDB参与者用户肾脏数据集,使用组织学代码“移行细胞癌”,选取2004年至2015年的pN+患者。LND计算为阳性淋巴结数除以切除的淋巴结总数。患者按传统AJCC pN分期分层,并与LND组(<30%,≥30%)进行比较。主要结局为总生存期。进行了Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析。

结果

共确定2049例患者(pN1 = 1022,pN2 = 1027;LND < 30% = 370,≥ 30% = 1679)。平均LND为71%。使用pN分期进行的Cox死亡率回归不显著(p = 0.11);然而,使用LND组进行的Cox死亡率回归显示,LND≥30%时生存明显恶化(HR 1.54,p = 0.001)。2年总生存期的Kaplan-Meier分析显示,pN1和pN2分期之间无差异(35.3%对34.1%;对数秩p = 0.37)。2年总生存期的Kaplan-Meier分析显示,LND组之间存在显著差异(LND < 30%为47.3%,LND≥30%为32.0%;对数秩p < 0.001)。

结论

与传统AJCC pN分期相比,LND提供了关于总生存期的更好预后信息。未来研究需要评估LND,以改善对淋巴结阳性UTUC的预后理解。

相似文献

1
Lymph node density for stratification of survival outcomes with node positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma.用于对淋巴结阳性上尿路尿路上皮癌生存结局进行分层的淋巴结密度
Can J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(4):9852-9858.
2
Effect of lymph node dissection on stage-specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy.淋巴结清扫对接受肾输尿管切除术治疗的上尿路上皮癌患者的特定分期生存的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):1207. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6364-z.
3
Role of lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: multi-institutional large retrospective study JCOG1110A.根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌时淋巴结清扫的作用:多机构大回顾性研究 JCOG1110A。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1737-1744. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2049-x. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
The emerging role of lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.淋巴结切除术在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的新作用。
Urol Clin North Am. 2011 Nov;38(4):429-37, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2011.07.012. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
5
Does lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy affect oncological outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients without suspicious lymph node metastasis on preoperative imaging studies?在术前影像学检查未发现可疑淋巴结转移的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中,肾输尿管切除术期间进行淋巴结清扫是否会影响肿瘤学结局?
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):665-673. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1918-z. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Prognostic value of lymph node yield during nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.上尿路尿路上皮癌肾输尿管切除术时淋巴结获取量的预后价值
Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):151.e9-151.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
7
Rates of lymph node invasion and their impact on cancer specific mortality in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.上尿路尿路上皮癌的淋巴结侵犯率及其对癌症特异性死亡率的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;45(7):1238-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
8
Lymph node yield and tumor location in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing nephroureterectomy affects survival: A U.S. population-based analysis (2004-2012).接受肾输尿管切除术的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的淋巴结收获情况及肿瘤位置对生存有影响:一项基于美国人群的分析(2004 - 2012年)
Urol Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(12):531.e15-531.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.013. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
9
Contemporary role of lymph node dissection at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌时淋巴结清扫的当代作用。
World J Urol. 2017 Apr;35(4):535-548. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1764-z. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
10
The contemporary role of lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy in the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: the Canadian experience.当代肾输尿管切除术时淋巴结清扫术在上尿路尿路上皮癌治疗中的作用:加拿大经验。
Urology. 2012 Apr;79(4):840-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.058. Epub 2012 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cytoreductive nephroureterectomy for treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma initially diagnosed as node-positive.减瘤性肾输尿管切除术用于治疗最初诊断为淋巴结阳性的上尿路尿路上皮癌。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 12;15(1):29481. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14947-4.
2
Optimal treatment strategy and prognostic analysis for patients with locally advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.局部晚期上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的最佳治疗策略及预后分析
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 2;12:1548191. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1548191. eCollection 2025.
3
The Value of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Node-Positive Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
淋巴结清扫术在淋巴结阳性上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中的价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 16;12:889144. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889144. eCollection 2022.