Centre de Recerca en Economia I Salut - UPF, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain.
Liver Unit Hospital Clínic, Institut D'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación En Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas Y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Spain.
J Hepatol. 2019 Dec;71(6):1141-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.019. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and alcohol-related liver disease pose an important challenge to current clinical healthcare pathways because of the large number of at-risk patients. Therefore, we aimed to explore the cost-effectiveness of transient elastography (TE) as a screening method to detect liver fibrosis in a primary care pathway.
Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using real-life individual patient data from 6 independent prospective cohorts (5 from Europe and 1 from Asia). A diagnostic algorithm with conditional inference trees was developed to explore the relationships between liver stiffness, socio-demographics, comorbidities, and hepatic fibrosis, the latter assessed by fibrosis scores (FIB-4, NFS) and liver biopsies in a subset of 352 patients. We compared the incremental cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy against standard of care alongside the numbers needed to screen to diagnose a patient with fibrosis stage ≥F2.
The data set encompassed 6,295 participants (mean age 55 ± 12 years, BMI 27 ± 5 kg/m, liver stiffness 5.6 ± 5.0 kPa). A 9.1 kPa TE cut-off provided the best accuracy for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (≥F2) in general population settings, whereas a threshold of 9.5 kPa was optimal for populations at-risk of alcohol-related liver disease. TE with the proposed cut-offs outperformed fibrosis scores in terms of accuracy. Screening with TE was cost-effective with mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from 2,570 €/QALY (95% CI 2,456-2,683) for a population at-risk of alcohol-related liver disease (age ≥45 years) to 6,217 €/QALY (95% CI 5,832-6,601) in the general population. Overall, there was a 12% chance of TE screening being cost saving across countries and populations.
Screening for liver fibrosis with TE in primary care is a cost-effective intervention for European and Asian populations and may even be cost saving.
The lack of optimized public health screening strategies for the detection of liver fibrosis in adults without known liver disease presents a major healthcare challenge. Analyses from 6 independent international cohorts, with transient elastography measurements, show that a community-based risk-stratification strategy for alcohol-related and non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases is cost-effective and potentially cost saving for our healthcare systems, as it leads to earlier identification of patients.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病和酒精相关性肝病对当前的临床医疗保健路径构成了重大挑战,因为有大量高危患者。因此,我们旨在探讨瞬时弹性成像(TE)作为一种筛查方法在初级保健路径中检测肝纤维化的成本效益。
使用来自 6 个独立前瞻性队列的真实个体患者数据(5 个来自欧洲,1 个来自亚洲)进行成本效益分析。使用条件推理树开发了一种诊断算法,以探索肝硬度与社会人口统计学、合并症和肝纤维化之间的关系,后者通过纤维化评分(FIB-4、NFS)和 352 名患者亚组的肝活检进行评估。我们比较了针对标准护理的筛查策略的增量成本效益,以及筛查诊断纤维化分期≥F2 的患者所需的数量。
该数据集包含 6295 名参与者(平均年龄 55±12 岁,BMI 27±5kg/m,肝硬度 5.6±5.0kPa)。在一般人群中,9.1kPa 的 TE 截止值可提供诊断显著纤维化(≥F2)的最佳准确性,而对于酒精相关性肝病高危人群,最佳截止值为 9.5kPa。在准确性方面,TE 优于纤维化评分。使用建议的截止值进行 TE 筛查具有成本效益,平均增量成本效益比范围从酒精相关性肝病高危人群(年龄≥45 岁)的 2570 欧元/QALY(95%CI 2456-2683)到一般人群的 6217 欧元/QALY(95%CI 5832-6601)。总体而言,在各国和人群中,TE 筛查有 12%的可能性节省成本。
在初级保健中使用 TE 筛查肝纤维化对欧洲和亚洲人群是一种具有成本效益的干预措施,甚至可能具有成本效益。
缺乏针对无已知肝病的成人肝纤维化检测的优化公共卫生筛查策略,这是一个主要的医疗保健挑战。来自 6 个独立国际队列的分析,包括瞬时弹性成像测量,表明针对酒精相关性和非酒精性脂肪性肝病的基于社区的风险分层策略对我们的医疗保健系统具有成本效益,并且可能具有成本效益,因为它可以更早地识别患者。