Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):896-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.066. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Surgical site infection (SSI) with lower extremity incisions represents a modifiable source of major morbidity. Our institutional bundled care protocol to decrease SSI includes optimization of perioperative risk factors, dedicated wound closure tray, and voluntary use of a closed surface negative pressure wound therapy (cNPWT) device applied over closed incisions in the operating room. This study examined the individual effect of cNPWT on SSI reduction and other perioperative outcomes.
All patients with lower extremity or infrainguinal incisions between January 2016 and December 2017 were prospectively identified and tracked for infectious complications. All patients were treated with the same perioperative care bundle to reduce SSI. cNPWT was applied over closed incisions at the discretion of the surgeon. The 90-day outcomes regarding SSI, return to operating room, death, and readmission were tracked. Univariate and multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression for factors associated with SSI was performed for patients with and without cNPWT devices, with P < .05 determined to be significant.
There were 504 patients included, 225 with cNPWT and 279 with standard dressings. Between the groups, there were no major differences in mean age, mean body mass index, perioperative transfusions, use of prosthetic, reoperative field, dialysis status, and presence of diabetes. There were significantly more women (39.6% vs 27.2% female; P < .01) and active smokers (47.1% vs 30.2%; P < .01) in the cNPWT group along with increased mean operative times (238.3 vs 189.0 minutes; P < .01). Univariate analysis revealed significantly fewer SSIs with cNPWT (9.8% vs 19.0% in standard dressings; P < .01) along with decreased perioperative mortality (5.8% vs 11.2%; P = .04). There were no differences in return to operating room (27.6% cNPWT vs 27.7% standard; P = .97) or readmissions (29.8% cNPWT vs 26.5%; P = .43), but more returns to the operating room were for wound-related problems in the standard dressings group (48.3% vs 26.2%; P < .01). Binary logistic regression using an SSI end point demonstrated that female sex increases SSI (odds ratio, 2.43; confidence interval, 1.37-4.30; P < .01), whereas cNPWT reduces SSI (odds ratio, 0.32; confidence interval, 0.17-0.63; P < .01).
The use of negative pressure wound therapy devices decreases the incidence of infrainguinal wound infections. This occurs as an independent factor as part of a patient care bundle targeting modifiable variables in perioperative care.
下肢切口的手术部位感染(SSI)是导致严重发病率的可改变来源。我们的机构捆绑式护理方案包括优化围手术期风险因素、专用伤口闭合托盘,以及自愿使用封闭表面负压伤口治疗(cNPWT)装置,该装置在手术室中应用于闭合切口。本研究检查了 cNPWT 对 SSI 减少和其他围手术期结果的单独影响。
所有 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月之间下肢或下肢以下切口的患者均前瞻性确定并跟踪感染并发症。所有患者均接受相同的围手术期护理包以降低 SSI。cNPWT 根据外科医生的判断应用于闭合的切口。跟踪 90 天的 SSI、返回手术室、死亡和再入院的结果。对使用和不使用 cNPWT 设备的患者进行单变量和多变量分析,使用二元逻辑回归分析与 SSI 相关的因素,P 值<.05 为显著。
共有 504 名患者入选,其中 225 名患者使用 cNPWT,279 名患者使用标准敷料。两组之间,平均年龄、平均体重指数、围手术期输血、使用假体、再次手术部位、透析状态和糖尿病的存在无显著差异。cNPWT 组的女性(39.6%比 27.2%;P<.01)和主动吸烟者(47.1%比 30.2%;P<.01)明显更多,平均手术时间更长(238.3 比 189.0 分钟;P<.01)。单变量分析显示,cNPWT 组 SSI 明显减少(标准敷料组为 9.8%比 19.0%;P<.01),围手术期死亡率降低(5.8%比 11.2%;P=.04)。返回手术室的比例无差异(cNPWT 组为 27.6%,标准敷料组为 27.7%;P=.97)或再入院率(cNPWT 组为 29.8%,标准敷料组为 26.5%;P=.43),但标准敷料组返回手术室更多的是伤口相关问题(48.3%比 26.2%;P<.01)。使用 SSI 终点的二元逻辑回归显示,女性会增加 SSI(比值比,2.43;95%置信区间,1.37-4.30;P<.01),而 cNPWT 可降低 SSI(比值比,0.32;95%置信区间,0.17-0.63;P<.01)。
负压伤口治疗装置的使用降低了下肢切口感染的发生率。这是作为患者护理包的一部分针对围手术期可改变变量的目标的独立因素。