Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(13):4466-4471. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07778-x. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
Given the emerging evidence supporting the lack of prognostic significance of gross extrathyroidal extension invading only strap muscles (strap-gETE), this study investigated whether lobectomy is feasible for patients with strap-gETE.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 636 patients who had 1- to 4-cm-sized papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) treated with thyroid lobectomy. Patients with gross invasion of perithyroidal organs other than strap muscles or synchronous distant metastasis were excluded from the study. Disease-free survival (DFS) was compared according to the presence of strap-gETE.
Strap-gETE was present in 50 patients (7.9%), with the remaining 586 patients (92.1%) showing no evidence of gETE. During the median follow-up period of 7.4 years, 6% of the patients with strap-gETE and 5.1% of the patients without gETE experienced structural persistent/recurrent disease (p = 0.99). No differences in DFS were observed between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-4.08; p = 0.720). After adjustment for five major risk factors (age, gender, tumor size, multifocality, and cervical lymph node metastasis status) in the multivariate analysis, the presence of strap-gETE did not exhibit an independent role in the development of structural persistent/recurrent disease (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.24-4.53, p = 0.950).
Strap-gETE did not increase the risk of structural persistent/recurrent disease for the patients who underwent lobectomy for 1- to 4-cm-sized PTC. The study data support the limited role of strap-gETE in clinical outcomes and may broaden the indications for lobectomy for patients with PTCs.
鉴于越来越多的证据表明,仅侵犯颈前肌群的甲状腺外侵犯(strap-gETE)缺乏预后意义,本研究探讨了甲状腺叶切除是否适用于颈前肌群受侵的患者。
本研究回顾性分析了 636 例 1-4cm 大小的甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者的临床资料,这些患者均接受甲状腺叶切除术治疗。研究排除了甲状腺周围器官侵犯和同步远处转移的患者。根据是否存在 strap-gETE 比较无病生存率(DFS)。
50 例(7.9%)患者存在 strap-gETE,其余 586 例(92.1%)患者无 gETE 证据。在中位随访 7.4 年期间,strap-gETE 组有 6%的患者和无 gETE 组有 5.1%的患者出现结构性持续性/复发性疾病(p=0.99)。两组间 DFS 无差异(风险比 [HR],1.24;95%置信区间 [CI],0.38-4.08;p=0.720)。多因素分析中调整 5 个主要危险因素(年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、多灶性和颈部淋巴结转移状态)后,颈前肌群侵犯在结构性持续性/复发性疾病的发生中并未显示出独立作用(HR 1.05;95%CI 0.24-4.53,p=0.950)。
对于接受 1-4cm 大小的 PTC 甲状腺叶切除术的患者,颈前肌群侵犯并未增加结构性持续性/复发性疾病的风险。本研究数据支持颈前肌群侵犯在临床结局中的有限作用,并可能拓宽 PTC 患者甲状腺叶切除术的适应证。