Zhang Li, Liu Jia, Wang Peisong, Xue Shuai, Li Jie, Chen Guang
Department of Nephrology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Department of Thyroid Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 25;10:1687. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01687. eCollection 2020.
Gross strap muscle invasion (gSMI) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) was defined as high-risk recurrent group in the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines. However, controversy persists because several studies suggested gSMI had little effect on disease outcome. Herein, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate impact of gSMI on outcome of DTC. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE) for studies published until February 2020 was performed. Case-control studies and randomized controlled trials that studied the impact of gSMI on outcome of DTC were included. Six studies (all retrospective studies) involving 13,639 patients met final inclusion criteria. Compared with no extrathyroidal extension (ETE), patients with gSMI were associated with increased risk of recurrence ( = 0.0004, OR, 1.46; 95% CI: 1.18-1.80) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) ( < 0.00001, OR 4.19; 95% CI: 2.53-6.96). For mortality ( = 0.34, OR 1.47; 95% CI: 0.67-3.25), 10 year disease-specific survival ( = 0.80, OR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.44-1.88), and distant metastasis (DM) ( = 0.21, OR 2.94; 95% CI: 0.54-15.93), there was no significant difference between gSMI and no ETE group. In contrast with maximal ETE(extension of the primary tumor to the trachea, esophagus, recurrent laryngeal nerve, larynx, subcutaneous soft tissue, skin, internal jugular vein, or carotid artery), patients with gSMI were associated with decreased risk of recurrence ( < 0.0001, OR, 0.58; 95% CI: 0.44-0.76), mortality ( = 0.0003, OR 0.20; 95% CI: 0.08-0.48), LNM ( = 0.0003, OR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.50-0.81), and DM ( = 0.0009, OR 0.28; 95% CI: 0.13-0.59). DTC patients with gSMI had a higher risk of recurrence and LNM than those without ETE. However, in contrast with maximal ETE, a much better prognosis was observed in DTC patients with only gSMI.
在2015年美国甲状腺协会指南中,分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者的大体带状肌侵犯(gSMI)被定义为高危复发组。然而,争议仍然存在,因为多项研究表明gSMI对疾病预后影响不大。在此,进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究gSMI对DTC预后的影响。对电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和MEDLINE)进行了系统检索,以查找截至2020年2月发表的研究。纳入了研究gSMI对DTC预后影响的病例对照研究和随机对照试验。六项研究(均为回顾性研究)涉及13639例患者,符合最终纳入标准。与无甲状腺外侵犯(ETE)的患者相比,gSMI患者复发风险增加(P = 0.0004,OR,1.46;95%CI:1.18 - 1.80)和淋巴结转移(LNM)风险增加(P < 0.00001,OR 4.19;95%CI:2.53 - 6.96)。对于死亡率(P = 0.34,OR 1.47;95%CI:0.67 - 3.25)、10年疾病特异性生存率(P = 0.80,OR 0.91;95%CI:0.44 - 1.88)和远处转移(DM)(P = 0.21,OR 2.94;95%CI:0.54 - 15.93),gSMI组和无ETE组之间无显著差异。与最大ETE(原发性肿瘤侵犯气管、食管、喉返神经、喉、皮下软组织、皮肤、颈内静脉或颈动脉)相比,gSMI患者复发风险降低(P < 0.0001,OR,0.58;95%CI:0.44 - 0.76)、死亡率降低(P = 0.0003,OR 0.20;95%CI:0.08 - 0.48)、LNM风险降低(P = 0.0003,OR 0.64;95%CI:0.50 - 0.81)和DM风险降低(P = 0.0009,OR 0.28;95%CI:0.13 - 0.59)。有gSMI的DTC患者比无ETE的患者有更高的复发和LNM风险。然而,与最大ETE相比,仅患有gSMI的DTC患者预后要好得多。