Orthopaedic and Trauma Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", AOU Consorziale "Policlinico", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jul;32(7):1219-1232. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01289-1. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
To assess the outcome of augmentation techniques, i.e., percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), vertebral body stenting (VBS) and fixation techniques in the management of vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs).
OVID-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Springer Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar and PubMed were searched from January 2009 to February 2019 to identify relevant studies. The methodological qualities of the studies were evaluated and relevant data were extracted.
Thirteen randomized controlled trials, recruiting 1963 patients, were included. PVP, compared with conservative management (CM), showed a greater pain relief and an improved vertebral body height (VBH) restoration. Moreover, PVP revealed superior to a sham procedure for pain relief in acute VFFs. BKP, compared with CM, rapidly reduces pain and improves quality of life without increasing the risk of additional VFFs. BKP, compared with PVP, has fewer cement leakage rates and is more effective in VBH restoration. BKP should also be preferred to VBS, since it is associated with less material-related complications. Pedicle screw fixation associated with PVP, compared with PVP alone, revealed effective in preventing secondary VFFs.
BKP showed better clinical and radiological outcomes compared with CM and PVP. BKP revealed as effective as VBS in VBH restoration with less material-related complications.
评估增强技术(即经皮椎体成形术(PVP)、球囊椎体后凸成形术(BKP)、椎体支架置入术(VBS)和固定技术)在治疗椎体脆性骨折(VFF)中的疗效。
从 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月,在 OVID-MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、SCOPUS、施普林格链接、Web of Science、Google Scholar 和 PubMed 上搜索相关研究。评估研究的方法学质量并提取相关数据。
纳入了 13 项随机对照试验,共纳入 1963 名患者。与保守治疗(CM)相比,PVP 能更好地缓解疼痛和恢复椎体高度(VBH)。此外,与假手术相比,PVP 对急性 VFF 更能缓解疼痛。与 CM 相比,BKP 能迅速缓解疼痛并改善生活质量,而不会增加额外发生 VFF 的风险。与 PVP 相比,BKP 具有较低的骨水泥渗漏率,在 VBH 恢复方面更为有效。由于 BKP 与更少的材料相关并发症相关,因此应优先考虑 BKP 而不是 VBS。与单独使用 PVP 相比,PVP 联合椎弓根螺钉固定能更有效地预防继发性 VFF。
与 CM 和 PVP 相比,BKP 显示出更好的临床和影像学结果。与材料相关并发症较少的 VBS 相比,BKP 在 VBH 恢复方面同样有效。