Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Division of Otolaryngology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jun;130(6):1422-1427. doi: 10.1002/lary.28257. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
Microvascular decompression (MVD) may be employed in the management of hemifacial spasm (HFS), wherein a pledget of polytetrafluoroethylene (i.e., Teflon, Chemours, Wilmington DE) is sometimes introduced to separate an offending vessel from the cisternal segment of facial nerve. Rarely, Teflon may cause a granulomatous reaction resulting in nerve palsy. We here present the first case series of facial palsy thought to be secondary to Teflon granuloma following MVD for HFS.
A data repository of 1,312 patients with facial palsy was reviewed to identify individuals who had previously undergone MVD for HFS. Data collected include age at time of MVD, age at onset of facial weakness and at presentation, House-Brackmann scores, clinician-graded facial function using the Electronic Facial Paralysis Assessment scale, imaging findings, and therapeutic interventions and outcomes.
Six patients meeting criteria were identified. Average time between MVD with Teflon placement and onset of facial weakness was 16.1 (±4.9) years (range 9.3-23.3 years). Initial House-Brackmann scores were as follows: four patients with V/VI and one each with III/VI and IV/VI. Interventions included eyelid weight placement (n = 3), chemodenervation (n = 2), static suspension with tensor fascia latae (n = 2), dynamic reanimation with cranial nerves V to VII transfer (n = 1), and temporalis muscle transfer (n = 1).
Teflon granuloma should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with new onset facial weakness with a previous history of MVD for HFS. It remains unknown whether early granuloma extirpation is effective. Prompt diagnosis allows consideration of time-sensitive nerve transfer procedures to reanimate facial function.
4 Laryngoscope, 130:1422-1427, 2020.
微血管减压术(MVD)可用于治疗面肌痉挛(HFS),在此过程中,有时会引入聚四氟乙烯(即特氟龙,Chemours,特拉华州威尔明顿)垫,将肇事血管与面神经的脑池段隔开。但特氟龙很少会引起肉芽肿反应,导致神经麻痹。我们在此介绍首例因 MVD 治疗 HFS 后面神经麻痹被认为是特氟龙肉芽肿引起的病例系列。
我们回顾了 1312 例面神经麻痹患者的数据库,以确定曾接受 MVD 治疗 HFS 的患者。收集的数据包括 MVD 时的年龄、面瘫发作时的年龄、就诊时的年龄、House-Brackmann 评分、使用电子面神经评估量表评估的临床医生分级面部功能、影像学发现以及治疗干预和结果。
符合标准的患者有 6 例。MVD 伴特氟龙放置与面瘫发作之间的平均时间为 16.1(±4.9)年(范围 9.3-23.3 年)。初始 House-Brackmann 评分如下:4 例为 V/VI,1 例为 III/VI,1 例为 IV/VI。干预措施包括眼睑重量放置(n=3)、化学神经切断术(n=2)、用阔筋膜张肌静态悬吊(n=2)、用颅神经 V 至 VII 转位进行动态再神经化(n=1)和颞肌转移(n=1)。
对于有 HFS 病史并出现新发性面瘫的患者,应考虑特氟龙肉芽肿作为鉴别诊断。目前尚不清楚早期肉芽肿切除是否有效。及时诊断可考虑采用对时间敏感的神经转移术来恢复面部功能。
4 Laryngoscope,130:1422-1427,2020。