Almansoori Akram Abdo, Choung Han-Wool, Kim Bongju, Park Joo-Young, Kim Soung-Min, Lee Jong-Ho
Clinical Fellow, Oral Cancer Center and Clinical Translational Research Center for Dental Science, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chungang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jan;78(1):153-166. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
A cohort review was performed to compare the effect of a number of variables on mandible reconstruction plate (R-plate) survival and to identify the potential risk factors for plate fracture. We also reported our preliminary results of 3-dimensional (3D) printed reconstruction plates.
The data from patients who had undergone mandibular reconstruction using reconstruction plates were evaluated for age, gender, mandibular resection indication, defect site and length, remaining occluded teeth, reconstruction plate type, simultaneous soft or bone tissue reconstruction, and radiotherapy. The plate survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curve, and the variables were compared using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Multifactorial risk correlation was determined using logistic regression analysis.
The study included 159 patients who had been followed for 97 ± 5.4 months. Of the 159 patients, 22 had experienced plate fracture that had occurred within 20 months. Most of the plate fractures had occurred near the mandibular bone stump, passing through the shoulder of the plate hole or the bridge between the subsequent plate holes. The overall survival was 86.2%. Patients with few occluded teeth (type I) had a significantly greater R-plate survival rate compared with those with many occluded teeth (P = .045). Laterocentral "LC" defects had a significantly lower survival rate (44.4%) compared with lateral "L" defects (84.5%; P = .00). The survival rates with soft tissue (88.7%) or bone tissue reconstruction (100%) were significantly different compared with that for R-plate alone (40%; P = .000 and P = .004, respectively). Four patients received 3D printed R-plates and were followed for 2 to 8 months (mean, 4 months) with no complications.
Patients with many remaining occluded teeth, LC defect, and the absence of simultaneous soft or bone tissue reconstruction were associated with a lower plate survival rate. Bending of the plate increased the incidence of plate fracture, and the use of 3D printed customized R-plates seems a valuable alternative.
进行一项队列回顾研究,比较多个变量对下颌骨重建钢板(R板)存留率的影响,并确定钢板骨折的潜在危险因素。我们还报告了三维(3D)打印重建钢板的初步结果。
对使用重建钢板进行下颌骨重建的患者数据进行评估,内容包括年龄、性别、下颌骨切除指征、缺损部位及长度、剩余咬合牙、重建钢板类型、同期软组织或骨组织重建以及放疗情况。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线估计钢板存留率,并使用对数秩(Mantel-Cox)检验比较各变量。采用逻辑回归分析确定多因素风险相关性。
该研究纳入了159例患者,随访时间为97±5.4个月。在这159例患者中,有22例在20个月内发生了钢板骨折。大多数钢板骨折发生在下颌骨残端附近,穿过钢板孔的肩部或后续钢板孔之间的桥接处。总体存留率为86.2%。咬合牙少的患者(I型)的R板存留率明显高于咬合牙多的患者(P = 0.045)。与外侧“L”型缺损(84.5%)相比,中央外侧“LC”型缺损的存留率显著较低(44.4%;P = 0.00)。与单纯R板(40%)相比,软组织重建(88.7%)或骨组织重建(100%)的存留率有显著差异(分别为P = 0.000和P = 0.004)。4例患者接受了3D打印的R板,随访2至8个月(平均4个月),无并发症发生。
剩余咬合牙多、LC型缺损以及未同期进行软组织或骨组织重建的患者,钢板存留率较低。钢板弯曲会增加钢板骨折的发生率,使用3D打印定制R板似乎是一种有价值的选择。