• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起搏器诱发的心肌病的发病率及预测因素:单中心经验

Incidence and predictors of pacemaker induced cardiomyopathy: A single-center experience.

作者信息

Abdin Amr, Yalin Kivanc, Zink Matthias Daniel, Napp Andreas, Gramlich Michael, Marx Nikolaus, Schuett Katharina

机构信息

University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Critical Care (Medical Clinic 1), Aachen, Germany.

Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;57:31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.08.016. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.08.016
PMID:31473477
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pacemaker induced Cardiomyopathy (PICM) is an easily overlooked cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Data regarding this complication are sparse. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the incidence and predictors of PICM.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2017, 857 consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation, were reviewed, and according to our inclusion criteria 173 individuals were enrolled in this retrospective single center study. All patients included had normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) before implantation, underwent single-chamber ventricular or dual-chamber PM implantation, had RV pacing burden ≥20%, and repeated echocardiogram was available ≥1 year after implantation. PICM was defined as deterioration LVEF ≥10%, resulting in LVEF <50%, which cannot be explained by other causes.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 39.9 ± 21.0 months, PICM occurred in 26 patients (16%). RV pacing percentage did not differ significantly between the both groups (76.5 vs 76.2%, p = 0.65). The PICM group patients were likely to be men (p = 0.002) and had a lower rate of arterial hypertension (p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed male sex (HR 6.45, 0.95 CI 1.90-21.86, p = 0.003) and wider paced QRS complex (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, p < 0.001) as predictors of PICM.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with frequent RV pacing, the prevalence of PICM is not uncommon. Male sex and wider paced QRS complex are independent predictors of PICM and these patients may require closer follow-up.

摘要

背景

起搏器诱导的心肌病(PICM)是射血分数降低的心力衰竭的一个容易被忽视的原因。关于这一并发症的数据很少。因此,本研究的目的是确定PICM的发生率和预测因素。

方法

回顾2011年至2017年间连续857例行起搏器(PM)植入术的患者,根据纳入标准,173例患者纳入本回顾性单中心研究。所有纳入患者植入前左心室射血分数(LVEF)正常,接受单腔心室或双腔PM植入,右心室起搏负担≥20%,植入后≥1年可进行重复超声心动图检查。PICM定义为LVEF恶化≥10%,导致LVEF<50%,且不能用其他原因解释。

结果

在平均39.9±21.0个月的随访期间,26例患者(16%)发生PICM。两组间右心室起搏百分比无显著差异(76.5%对76.2%,p=0.65)。PICM组患者男性居多(p=0.002),动脉高血压发生率较低(p=0.01)。多变量分析显示男性(HR 6.45,95%CI 1.90-21.86,p=0.003)和更宽的起搏QRS波群(HR 1.04,95%CI 1.02-1.07,p<0.001)是PICM的预测因素。

结论

在右心室频繁起搏的患者中,PICM的发生率并不罕见。男性和更宽的起搏QRS波群是PICM的独立预测因素,这些患者可能需要更密切的随访。

相似文献

1
Incidence and predictors of pacemaker induced cardiomyopathy: A single-center experience.起搏器诱发的心肌病的发病率及预测因素:单中心经验
J Electrocardiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;57:31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.08.016. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
2
Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.右心室起搏诱发心肌病的发生率及预测因素
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Sep;11(9):1619-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.05.040. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
3
Longer Paced QRS Duration is Associated With Increased Prevalence of Right Ventricular Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy.更长的起搏QRS波时限与右心室起搏诱导性心肌病患病率增加相关。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Oct;27(10):1174-1179. doi: 10.1111/jce.13045. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
4
Predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced left ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker recipients with preserved ejection fraction.预测射血分数保留的起搏器受者右心室起搏致左心室功能障碍的因素。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022 Sep;33(3):312-318. doi: 10.1007/s00399-022-00880-w. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
Paced QRS morphology mimicking complete left bundle branch block induced by right ventricular pacing is associated with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.起搏 QRS 形态酷似完全性左束支阻滞由右心室起搏引起与起搏诱导的心肌病有关。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 May;35(5):906-915. doi: 10.1111/jce.16229. Epub 2024 Mar 3.
6
Prevalence and predictors of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in young adult patients (<60 years) with pacemakers.起搏器植入的年轻成年患者(<60 岁)中起搏诱导性心肌病的患病率及预测因素。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Jul;32(7):1961-1968. doi: 10.1111/jce.15029. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Do the predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy add up?右心室起搏诱导性心肌病的预测因素是否成立?
Indian Heart J. 2021 Sep-Oct;73(5):582-587. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
8
Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with complete atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular systolic function.完全性房室传导阻滞且左心室收缩功能正常患者右心室起搏诱发心肌病的发生率及预测因素
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Dec;13(12):2272-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.09.027.
9
Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in pacemaker-dependent patients is lower with leadless pacemakers compared to transvenous pacemakers.与经静脉起搏器相比,无导线起搏器用于依赖起搏器的患者时,起搏诱导性心肌病的发生率较低。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):477-483. doi: 10.1111/jce.14814. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
10
Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with preserved ejection fraction undergoing permanent cardiac pacemaker placement.起搏诱导的射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者行永久性心脏起搏器植入术后的心肌病。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;67(2):363-369. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01650-5. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of stylet-driven leads compared to lumenless leads for left bundle branch are pacing: systematic review and meta-analysis.与无腔导线相比,探条驱动导线用于左束支起搏的结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02673-w.
2
Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: left bundle branch area pacing versus leadless pacing.起搏诱导性心肌病的发生率:左束支区域起搏与无导线起搏
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02048-1.
3
Utilization of leadless pacemaker following orthotopic heart transplantation for complete heart block during index hospitalization.
原位心脏移植后因完全性心脏传导阻滞在索引住院期间使用无导线起搏器。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2024 Sep 18;10(12):949-952. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.09.010. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Pacemaker-induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of Three Cases.冠状动脉疾病患者的起搏器诱发的心肌病:三例报告
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2024 Jan 15;15(1):5735-5738. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15011. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Feasibility and Efficacy of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair in Patients with Cardiac Implanted Electrical Devices and Trans-Tricuspid Leads.心脏植入式电子装置及经三尖瓣导线患者行经导管三尖瓣修复术的可行性和疗效
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 27;12(15):4930. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154930.
6
Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Leadless and Traditional Pacemakers: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.无导线起搏器和传统起搏器所致的起搏诱导性心肌病:单中心回顾性分析
Cureus. 2023 Jul 5;15(7):e41393. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41393. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
The soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 as a biomarker of early cardiac remodeling in bradycardia patients receiving permanent pacemaker therapy.可溶性致瘤性抑制因子2作为接受永久起搏器治疗的心动过缓患者早期心脏重塑的生物标志物。
Future Sci OA. 2023 Mar 3;9(1):FSO831. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2023-0001. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Risk of Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients with High-Degree Atrioventricular Block-Impact of Right Ventricular Lead Position Confirmed by Computed Tomography.高度房室传导阻滞患者发生起搏诱导性心肌病的风险——计算机断层扫描证实右心室导线位置的影响
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 5;11(23):7228. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237228.
9
A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing left bundle branch pacing, his bundle branch pacing, and right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block.一项比较左束支起搏、希氏束起搏和右心室起搏治疗房室传导阻滞的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 25;9:939850. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.939850. eCollection 2022.
10
Understanding Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy Incidence and Predictors in Patients with Right Ventricular Pacing: A Systematic Review.了解右心室起搏患者起搏器诱导的心肌病的发生率及预测因素:一项系统评价
Int J Angiol. 2021 Oct 1;31(1):10-15. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735206. eCollection 2022 Mar.