Department of Neurology, Emory University, Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):392-395. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015205. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
Technical improvements to enhance distal occlusion thrombectomy are desirable. We describe the blind catheter exchange technique and report the pinning technique with small devices ('mini-pinning') for distal occlusions.
A retrospective review of a prospective database from January 2015 to August 2018 was performed for cases of distal occlusion in which the 'blind exchange/mini-pinning' (BEMP) techniques were used. The technique involves the deployment of a 3 mm Trevo retriever followed by microcatheter removal and blind advancement of a 3MAX aspiration catheter over the bare retriever delivery wire ('blind exchange') until clot contact under aspiration. The retriever is subsequently partially recaptured in order to 'cork' the thrombus ('mini-pinning') and the system pulled as a unit. Patients with distal occlusions treated with BEMP and standard techniques (either 3 mm Trevo or 3MAX) were compared.
Twenty-five vessels were treated in 22 patients. The majority of patients had isolated distal occlusions predominantly in the distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) segments, half of which involved the superior division. The comparison between BEMP (n=25 vessels) and standard techniques (n=144 vessels) revealed balanced groups. One of the highlighted differences was the more distal MCA occlusions among those who underwent BEMP (M3 occlusions 52% vs 22%; p=0.001). Otherwise, the vessel, segments, divisions and luminal diameter were comparable. There was a higher rate of first-pass modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3 (80% vs 56%; p=0.03) and a trend towards higher rates of first-pass full reperfusion (60% vs 40%; p=0.07) with BEMP compared with standard techniques. Final reperfusion and clinical outcomes were comparable.
BEMP appears to be a safe and effective technique for the treatment of distal occlusions. Additional studies are warranted.
提高远端闭塞取栓术的技术水平是可取的。我们描述了盲法导管交换技术,并报告了使用小器械(“迷你钉合术”)治疗远端闭塞的钉合技术。
回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 8 月期间接受远端闭塞治疗的病例,这些病例使用了“盲法交换/迷你钉合术(BEMP)”技术。该技术涉及部署 3mm Trevo 取栓器,然后在裸取栓器输送导丝上盲法推进 3MAX 抽吸导管,直至抽吸接触血栓(“盲法交换”)。随后,取栓器部分回收,以“塞住”血栓(“迷你钉合术”),并作为一个整体拉动系统。将接受 BEMP 和标准技术(3mm Trevo 或 3MAX)治疗的患者进行比较。
22 例患者的 25 支血管接受了治疗。大多数患者的远端闭塞孤立存在,主要位于大脑中动脉(MCA)的远段,其中一半累及上部分支。BEMP(n=25 支血管)与标准技术(n=144 支血管)的比较显示两组均衡。一个突出的差异是接受 BEMP 的患者 MCA 远段闭塞更多(M3 闭塞 52% vs 22%;p=0.001)。否则,血管、节段、分支和管腔直径相似。BEMP 的首次通过改良脑梗死溶栓分级 2b-3(80% vs 56%;p=0.03)和首次通过完全再通率(60% vs 40%;p=0.07)的比例较高,与标准技术相比。最终再灌注和临床结局相似。
BEMP 似乎是一种安全有效的治疗远端闭塞的技术。需要进一步的研究。