Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Mar;29(3):225-231. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009032. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
To assess the impact of a quality improvement programme on blood pressure (BP) control and determine whether medication intensification or repeated measurement improved control.
Retrospective cohort comparing visits in 2015 to visits in 2016 (when the programme started).
Adults with ≥1 primary care visit between January and June in 2015 and 2016 and a diagnosis of hypertension in a large integrated health system.
Elevated BP was defined as a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg. Physician response was defined as: nothing; BP recheck within 30 days; or medication intensification within 30 days. Our outcome was BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) at the last visit of the year. We used a multilevel logistic regression model (adjusted for demographic and clinical variables) to identify the effect of the programme on the odds of BP control.
Our cohort included 111 867 adults. Control increased from 72% in 2015 to 79% in 2016 (p<0.01). The average percentage of visits with elevated blood pressure was 31% in 2015 and 25% in 2016 (p<0.01). During visits with an elevated BP, physicians were more likely to intensify medication in 2016 than in 2015 (43% vs 40%, p<0.01) and slightly more likely to obtain a BP recheck (15% vs 14%, p<0.01). Among patients with ≥1 elevated BP who attained control by the last visit in the year, there was 6% increase from 2015 to 2016 in the percentage of patients who received at least one medication intensification during the year and a 1% increase in BP rechecks. The adjusted odds of the last BP reading being categorised as controlled was 59% higher in 2016 than in 2015 (95% CI 1.54 to 1.64).
A system-wide initiative can improve BP control, primarily through medication intensification.
评估质量改进计划对血压(BP)控制的影响,并确定是加强药物治疗还是重复测量能更好地控制血压。
比较 2015 年和 2016 年(计划开始时)就诊的回顾性队列。
在大型综合医疗系统中,2015 年 1 月至 6 月期间至少有一次初级保健就诊且诊断为高血压的成年人。
血压升高定义为血压≥140/90mmHg。医生的反应定义为:无;30 天内复查血压;或 30 天内加强药物治疗。我们的结局是在当年的最后一次就诊时血压控制(<140/90mmHg)。我们使用多水平逻辑回归模型(调整了人口统计学和临床变量)来确定该计划对血压控制几率的影响。
我们的队列包括 111867 名成年人。控制率从 2015 年的 72%上升到 2016 年的 79%(p<0.01)。2015 年血压升高的就诊比例平均为 31%,2016 年为 25%(p<0.01)。在血压升高的就诊中,2016 年医生更倾向于加强药物治疗,而不是在 2015 年(43%对 40%,p<0.01),且更倾向于进行血压复查(15%对 14%,p<0.01)。在当年最后一次就诊时血压控制的患者中,至少有一次药物强化治疗的患者比例从 2015 年到 2016 年增加了 6%,血压复查增加了 1%。与 2015 年相比,2016 年最后一次血压读数被归类为控制的几率增加了 59%(95%CI 1.54 至 1.64)。
系统范围的倡议可以改善血压控制,主要是通过加强药物治疗。