• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在牙科环境中,两种不同温度下的两种术前冲洗液在减少超声洁治过程中产生的气溶胶污染方面的效果——一项微生物学研究。

Efficacy of Two Pre-Procedural Rinses at Two Different Temperatures in Reducing Aerosol Contamination Produced During Ultrasonic Scaling in a Dental Set-up - A Microbiological Study.

作者信息

Joshi Amruta Arun, Padhye Ashvini Mukul, Gupta Himani Swatantrakumar

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, MGM Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, India.

出版信息

J Int Acad Periodontol. 2017 Oct 1;19(4):138-144.

PMID:31473729
Abstract

Aerosol has been considered one of the main concerns in the dental community because of possible risk of infection transmission. Antiseptics used in the form of pre-procedural rinses can reduce aerosol contamination during dental procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride and 0.2% chlorhexidine pre-procedural rinses at 47ºC and 18ºC in reducing aerosol contamination during ultrasonic scaling procedures. Forty subjects were divided randomly and equally into four groups: A1 and A2 to receive cetylpyridinium chloride and B1 and B2 to receive chlorhexidine as pre-procedural rinses. Aerosol produced during the ultrasonic scaling procedure was collected on blood agar plates at three different locations, which were incubated at 37ºC for 48 hours and analysed for bacterial colony forming units (CFU). Cetylpyridinium chloride (0.05%) as a pre-procedural rinse was found to be equally effective in reducing aerosol contamination when compared with 0.2% chlorhexidine rinse (p > 0.05). Also, greater reduction of CFU was found with the use of tempered rinses at 47ºC with a highly statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Cetylpyridinium chloride (0.05%) can be considered as a promising alternative to the gold standard 0.2% chlorhexidine, with tempering the rinse showing the definite edge.

摘要

由于存在感染传播的潜在风险,气溶胶一直是牙科领域主要关注的问题之一。术前含漱形式使用的防腐剂可减少牙科手术过程中的气溶胶污染。本研究的目的是评估和比较47℃和18℃下0.05%西吡氯铵和0.2%氯己定术前含漱在超声洁治过程中减少气溶胶污染的效果。40名受试者被随机且平均分为四组:A1组和A2组接受西吡氯铵,B1组和B2组接受氯己定作为术前含漱。超声洁治过程中产生的气溶胶在三个不同位置收集到血琼脂平板上,在37℃孵育48小时并分析细菌菌落形成单位(CFU)。与0.2%氯己定含漱相比,0.05%西吡氯铵作为术前含漱在减少气溶胶污染方面同样有效(p>0.05)。此外,47℃温热含漱时CFU减少更多,具有高度统计学意义(p<0.001)。0.05%西吡氯铵可被视为金标准0.2%氯己定的一种有前景的替代物,温热含漱显示出明显优势。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Two Pre-Procedural Rinses at Two Different Temperatures in Reducing Aerosol Contamination Produced During Ultrasonic Scaling in a Dental Set-up - A Microbiological Study.在牙科环境中,两种不同温度下的两种术前冲洗液在减少超声洁治过程中产生的气溶胶污染方面的效果——一项微生物学研究。
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2017 Oct 1;19(4):138-144.
2
Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study.0.2% 温化氯己定作为术前口腔含漱液的疗效:一项临床研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Apr;16(2):213-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.99264.
3
Compare the effcacy of two commercially available mouthrinses in reducing viable bacterial count in dental aerosol produced during ultrasonic scaling when used as a preprocedural rinse.比较两种市售漱口水在用作术前冲洗时,减少超声洁牙过程中产生的牙科气溶胶中活菌数的效果。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Sep 1;14(5):848-51. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1414.
4
Effect of aloe vera as a preprocedural rinse in reducing aerosol contamination during ultrasonic scaling.芦荟作为术前漱口液在减少超声洁治过程中气溶胶污染方面的作用。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2020 Jan-Feb;24(1):37-41. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_188_19. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
5
Aerosols how dangerous they are in clinical practice.气雾剂在临床实践中有多危险。 (原英文句子表述不太准确规范,正常可能是“How dangerous are aerosols in clinical practice.” 翻译过来是“气雾剂在临床实践中多危险?” 但按照给定原文翻译如上。)
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):ZC52-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12038.5835. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Preprocedural mouth rinses for preventing transmission of infectious diseases through aerosols in dental healthcare providers.口腔预处理冲洗液在预防牙科医护人员通过气溶胶传播传染性疾病中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD013826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013826.pub2.
7
Efficacy of Oxygen-Enriched Mouthwash as a Pre-procedural Mouth Rinse Against Oral Microbes Produced During Ultrasonic Scaling.富氧漱口水作为超声洁治术前口腔冲洗剂对抗超声洁治过程中产生的口腔微生物的疗效。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 21;15(11):e49164. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49164. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
A study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinsing and high volume evacuator attachment alone and in combination in reducing the amount of viable aerosols produced during ultrasonic scaling procedure.一项评估和比较术前漱口和单独及联合使用高容量吸引器附件在减少超声洁牙过程中产生的可存活气溶胶量方面的疗效的研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Sep 1;13(5):681-9. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1209.
9
The effectiveness of a preprocedural mouthrinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride in reducing bacteria in the dental office.术前使用含有氯己定的漱口液在减少牙科诊室细菌方面的效果。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Apr;141(4):415-22. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0193.
10
Efficacy of Preprocedural Boric Acid Mouthrinse in Reducing Viable Bacteria in Dental Aerosols Produced during Ultrasonic Scaling.术前使用硼酸漱口水对减少超声洁牙过程中产生的牙科气溶胶中活菌的效果。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):282-288. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_374_20. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Preprocedural mouth rinses for preventing transmission of infectious diseases through aerosols in dental healthcare providers.口腔预处理冲洗液在预防牙科医护人员通过气溶胶传播传染性疾病中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD013826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013826.pub2.
2
Estimating salivary carriage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in nonsymptomatic people and efficacy of mouthrinse in reducing viral load: A randomized controlled trial.估算无症状人群中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的唾液携带情况以及漱口液降低病毒载量的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Nov;152(11):903-908. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3
Effectiveness of Pre-procedural Mouth Rinses in Reducing Aerosol Contamination During Periodontal Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review.
牙周预防期间术前口腔含漱在减少气溶胶污染方面的有效性:一项系统评价
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 10;8:600769. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.600769. eCollection 2021.
4
Effect of work environment and specialty degree of dentists on cross-infection control in COVID-19 pandemic.工作环境和牙医专业程度对新冠疫情期间交叉感染控制的影响。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul-Aug;25(4):101592. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2021.101592. Epub 2021 May 31.
5
SARS-CoV-2: characterisation and mitigation of risks associated with aerosol generating procedures in dental practices.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2:牙科诊疗中与产生气溶胶操作相关风险的特征及缓解措施
Br Dent J. 2021 Jan 7:1-7. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2504-8.
6
Quantitative measurements of aerosols from air-polishing and ultrasonic devices: (How) can we protect ourselves?空气喷砂和超声设备产生的气溶胶的定量测量:(如何)保护我们自己?
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 15;15(12):e0244020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244020. eCollection 2020.
7
Minimizing the aerosol-generating procedures in orthodontics in the era of a pandemic: Current evidence on the reduction of hazardous effects for the treatment team and patients.在大流行时代尽量减少正畸科的气溶胶生成操作:减少治疗团队和患者危险影响的当前证据。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Sep;158(3):330-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Aerosol-generating procedures in head and neck surgery - can we improve practice after COVID-19?头颈外科中的气溶胶产生操作——新冠疫情后我们能否改进操作?
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul;58(6):704-707. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.05.021. Epub 2020 May 23.