Suppr超能文献

治疗药物监测指导下哌拉西林/他唑巴坦持续输注显著提高危重症患者的药代动力学目标达标率:四年临床经验的回顾性分析。

Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam significantly improves pharmacokinetic target attainment in critically ill patients: a retrospective analysis of four years of clinical experience.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Heidenheim Hospital, Schloßhaustraße 100, 89522, Heidenheim, Germany.

出版信息

Infection. 2019 Dec;47(6):1001-1011. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01352-z. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Standard dosing and intermittent bolus application (IB) are important risk factors for pharmacokinetic (PK) target non-attainment during empirical treatment with β-lactams in critically ill patients, particularly in those with sepsis and septic shock. We assessed the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring-guided (TDM), continuous infusion (CI) and individual dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP) on PK-target attainment in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of a database including 484 patients [933 serum concentrations (SC)] with severe infections, sepsis and septic shock who received TDM-guided CI of PIP in the intensive care unit (ICU) of an academic teaching hospital. The PK-target was defined as a PIP SC between 33 and 64 mg/L [fT > 2-4 times the epidemiological cutoff value (ECOFF) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA)].

RESULTS

PK-target attainment with standard dosing (initial dose) was observed in 166 patients (34.3%), whereas only 49 patients (10.1%) demonstrated target non-attainment. The minimum PK-target of ≥ 33 mg/L was overall realized in 89.9% (n = 435/484) of patients after the first PIP dose including 146 patients (30.2%) with potentially harmful SCs ≥ 100 mg/L. Subsequent TDM-guided dose adjustments significantly enhanced PK-target attainment to 280 patients (62.4%) and significantly reduced the fraction of potentially overdosed (≥ 100 mg/L) patients to 4.5% (n = 20/449). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) resulted in a relevant reduction of PIP clearance (CL): no RRT CL 6.8/6.3 L/h (median/IQR) [SCs n = 752, patients n = 405], continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) CL 4.3/2.6 L/h [SCs n = 160, n = 71 patients], intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) CL 2.6/2.3 L/h [SCs n = 21, n = 8 patients]). A body mass index (BMI) of > 40 kg/m significantly increased CL 9.6/7.7 L/h [SC n = 43, n = 18 patients] in these patients. Age was significantly associated with supratherapeutic PIP concentrations (p < 0.0005), whereas high CrCL led to non-target attainment (p < 0.0005). Patients with target attainment (33-64 mg/L) within the first 24 h exhibited the lowest hospital mortality rates (13.9% [n = 23/166], p < 0.005). Those with target non-attainment demonstrated higher mortality rates (≤ 32 mg/L; 20.8% [n = 10/49] ≥ 64 mg/L; 29.4% [n = 79/269]).

CONCLUSION

TDM-guided CI of PIP is safe in critically ill patients and improves PK-target attainment. Exposure to defined PK-targets impacts patient mortality while lower and higher than intended SCs may influence the outcome of critically ill patients. Renal function and renal replacement therapy are main determinants of PK-target attainment. These results are only valid for CI of PIP and not for prolonged or intermittent bolus administration of PIP.

摘要

目的

在重症患者中,β-内酰胺类药物经验性治疗时,标准剂量和间歇性推注(IB)是药代动力学(PK)目标未达到的重要危险因素,尤其是在脓毒症和感染性休克患者中。我们评估了治疗药物监测指导(TDM)、连续输注(CI)和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(PIP)个体化给药对重症患者 PK 目标达到的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性、单中心分析,纳入了在学术教学医院重症监护病房(ICU)接受 TDM 指导 CI 的 PIP 的 484 例严重感染、脓毒症和感染性休克患者的数据库,共 933 个血清浓度(SC)。PK 目标定义为 PIP SC 为 33-64mg/L[游离浓度(fT)>铜绿假单胞菌(PSA)的流行病学截断值(ECOFF)的 2-4 倍]。

结果

标准剂量(初始剂量)时 PK 目标达到率为 166 例患者(34.3%),而仅 49 例患者(10.1%)出现目标未达到。首次 PIP 剂量后,484 例患者中的 335 例(89.9%)达到了最小 PK 目标值≥33mg/L,包括 146 例(30.2%)潜在有害 SCs≥100mg/L。随后的 TDM 指导剂量调整显著提高了 PK 目标达到率至 280 例患者(62.4%),显著降低了潜在过度给药(≥100mg/L)患者的比例至 4.5%(449 例患者中有 20 例)。肾脏替代治疗(RRT)导致 PIP 清除率显著降低:无 RRT CL 6.8/6.3L/h(中位数/四分位数间距)[SC 数量 n=752,患者数量 n=405],连续静脉-静脉血液透析(CVVHD)CL 4.3/2.6L/h[SC 数量 n=160,患者数量 n=71],间歇性血液透析(iHD)CL 2.6/2.3L/h[SC 数量 n=21,患者数量 n=8])。BMI>40kg/m2 时,CL 显著增加 9.6/7.7L/h[SC 数量 n=43,患者数量 n=18]。年龄与超治疗性 PIP 浓度显著相关(p<0.0005),而高肌酐清除率(CrCL)导致未达到目标(p<0.0005)。在 24 小时内达到目标(33-64mg/L)的患者的住院死亡率最低(13.9%[n=166 例中的 23 例],p<0.005)。目标未达到的患者死亡率较高(≤32mg/L 为 20.8%[n=49 例中的 10 例];≥64mg/L 为 29.4%[n=269 例中的 79 例])。

结论

在重症患者中,TDM 指导的 PIP CI 是安全的,并提高了 PK 目标的达到率。达到特定的 PK 目标会影响患者的死亡率,而低于或高于预期的 SC 可能会影响重症患者的预后。肾功能和肾脏替代治疗是 PK 目标达到的主要决定因素。这些结果仅适用于 PIP 的 CI,不适用于 PIP 的延长或间歇性推注给药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验