Suppr超能文献

一种新的、简化的血友病关节全面超声检查方案:通用简化超声(US-US)方案。

A new and simplified comprehensive ultrasound protocol of haemophilic joints: the Universal Simplified Ultrasound (US-US) protocol.

机构信息

Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2019 Nov;74(11):897.e9-897.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Abstract

AIM

To present a new protocol to optimise ultrasound (US) assessment of haemophilic arthropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ultrasound of haemophilic arthropathy joints was performed using three different ultrasound protocols, namely, the Toronto-Vellore Comprehensive Ultrasound (TVC-US) protocol, the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US), and the newly developed Universal Simplified Ultrasound (US-US) protocol. Synovial hypertrophy, haemosiderin deposition, effusion, erosion, and cartilage loss were evaluated in 20 joints. The reliability and diagnostic efficiency of these protocols was compared using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

The correlation between the TVC-US and US-US protocols for synovial hypertrophy was excellent: kappa significance (KS) was 1, but was substantial (KS=0.65) with the HEAD-US protocol. For effusion, both the TVC-US and the HEAD-US protocols had substantial correlation with the US-US protocol (KS=0.7 and 0.6 respectively). The correlation for erosion and cartilage loss was excellent between the TVC-US and the US-US with MRI (KS=1), but poor (KS=0) with the HEAD-US protocol. The US-US protocol also had good interobserver agreement (KS=1).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of the US-US protocol is comparable to the TVC-US protocol and MRI and is superior to the HEAD-US protocol in the assessment of haemophilic arthropathy.

摘要

目的

提出一种新的方案来优化超声(US)评估血友病性关节病。

材料与方法

采用三种不同的超声方案,即多伦多-维洛尔综合超声(TVC-US)方案、超声早期检测血友病性关节炎(HEAD-US)方案和新开发的通用简化超声(US-US)方案,对血友病性关节病关节进行超声检查。评估 20 个关节的滑膜肥厚、含铁血黄素沉积、积液、侵蚀和软骨丢失。采用磁共振成像(MRI)比较这些方案的可靠性和诊断效率。

结果

TVC-US 与 US-US 方案在评估滑膜肥厚方面具有极好的相关性:kappa 显著性(KS)为 1,但与 HEAD-US 方案相关性较强(KS=0.65)。在评估积液方面,TVC-US 和 HEAD-US 方案与 US-US 方案均具有较强的相关性(KS=0.7 和 0.6)。TVC-US 与 US-US 方案与 MRI 评估侵蚀和软骨丢失具有极好的相关性(KS=1),而与 HEAD-US 方案相关性较差(KS=0)。US-US 方案也具有良好的观察者间一致性(KS=1)。

结论

US-US 方案的准确性可与 TVC-US 方案和 MRI 相媲美,在评估血友病性关节病方面优于 HEAD-US 方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验