Najefi Ali-Asgar, Buraimoh Olatunbosun, Blackwell John, Bing Andrew, Varrall Ruth, Townshend David, Goldberg Andy
Student, Foot & Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, United Kingdom; Surgeon, Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS Trust, Queen's Hospital, Romford, United Kingdom.
Student, Foot & Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Sep;58(5):930-932. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.01.013.
Understanding the tibiotalar angle (TTA) is key to planning for deformity correction. The TTA is an important radiographic tool to determine alignment or malalignment of the ankle and hindfoot. Two methods of measuring the TTA have been described: the midline TTA (MTTA) and the lateral TTA (LTTA). The aim of this study was to compare the 2 angles as measured on mortise and anteroposterior (AP) radiographs in a series of normal and pathological cases. A radiographic review was performed of sequential ankle AP and mortise radiographs taken between January 2016 and September 2017 across 4 specialist orthopedic centers. Patients were categorized into a normal group, where patients had normal radiological appearances, and an arthritis group, where patients had radiographic arthritis. The MTTA and the LTTA were measured. The overall mean ± standard deviation MTTA was 88.7° ± 5.1°, and mean LTTA was 87.5° ± 5.2° (p < .01). There was no statistically significant difference between the MTTA and LTTA in the normal group or on AP radiographs alone (p = .09). There was a statistically significant difference between the MTTA and LTTA in the arthritis group (p < .01) and when measured on mortise radiographs (p = .02). The MTTA had no difference when measured on the AP and mortise radiographs. There was a statistically significant difference in the LTTA between AP and mortise radiographs (p = .04). We have shown the MTTA to be a reliable and reproducible tool in all patients, on AP and mortise radiographs. The type of radiograph does not alter the measurement of deformity. In contrast, we have shown the LTTA to be unreliable and statistically different when measured on AP and mortise radiographs.
了解胫距角(TTA)是进行畸形矫正规划的关键。TTA是确定踝关节和后足对线或对线不良的重要影像学工具。已经描述了两种测量TTA的方法:中线TTA(MTTA)和外侧TTA(LTTA)。本研究的目的是在一系列正常和病理病例中比较在踝关节正位和前后位(AP)X线片上测量的这两个角度。对2016年1月至2017年9月期间在4个专业骨科中心拍摄的连续踝关节AP和正位X线片进行了影像学回顾。患者被分为正常组(患者X线表现正常)和关节炎组(患者有X线关节炎表现)。测量MTTA和LTTA。MTTA的总体平均值±标准差为88.7°±5.1°,LTTA的平均值为87.5°±5.2°(p <.01)。在正常组或仅在AP X线片上,MTTA和LTTA之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.09)。在关节炎组中,MTTA和LTTA之间有统计学显著差异(p <.01),在正位X线片上测量时也有显著差异(p = 0.02)。在AP和正位X线片上测量时,MTTA没有差异。AP和正位X线片之间的LTTA有统计学显著差异(p = 0.04)。我们已经证明MTTA在所有患者的AP和正位X线片上都是一种可靠且可重复的工具。X线片类型不会改变畸形的测量结果。相比之下,我们已经证明LTTA在AP和正位X线片上测量时不可靠且在统计学上有差异。