• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评分预测因子分析:通过因子得分预测器再现观测协方差。

Score Predictor Factor Analysis: Reproducing Observed Covariances by Means of Factor Score Predictors.

作者信息

Beauducel André, Hilger Norbert

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 16;10:1895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01895. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01895
PMID:31474919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6707334/
Abstract

The non-diagonal elements of the observed covariances are more exactly reproduced by the factor loadings than by the model implied by the corresponding factor score predictors. This is a limitation to the validity of factor score predictors. It is therefore investigated whether it is possible to estimate factor loadings for which the model implied by the factor score predictors optimally reproduces the non-diagonal elements of the observed covariance matrix. Accordingly, loading estimates are proposed for which the model implied by the factor score predictors allows for a least-squares approximation of the non-diagonal elements of the observed covariance matrix. This estimation method is termed score predictor factor analysis and algebraically compared with Minres factor analysis as well as principal component analysis. A population-based and a sample-based simulation study was performed in order to compare score predictor factor analysis, Minres factor analysis, and principal component analysis. It turns out that the non-diagonal elements of the observed covariance matrix can more exactly be reproduced from the factor score predictors computed from score predictor factor analysis than from the factor score predictors computed from Minres factor analysis and from principal components.

摘要

与由相应因子得分预测变量所隐含的模型相比,因子载荷能更精确地重现观测协方差的非对角元素。这是因子得分预测变量有效性的一个限制。因此,研究了是否有可能估计因子载荷,使得由因子得分预测变量所隐含的模型能最优地重现观测协方差矩阵的非对角元素。相应地,提出了载荷估计方法,使得由因子得分预测变量所隐含的模型能够对观测协方差矩阵的非对角元素进行最小二乘近似。这种估计方法被称为得分预测变量因子分析,并在代数上与最小残差因子分析以及主成分分析进行比较。为了比较得分预测变量因子分析、最小残差因子分析和主成分分析,进行了基于总体和基于样本的模拟研究。结果表明,与从最小残差因子分析和主成分计算出的因子得分预测变量相比,从得分预测变量因子分析计算出的因子得分预测变量能更精确地重现观测协方差矩阵的非对角元素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/4c28a3537fe0/fpsyg-10-01895-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/c40a49e4fc91/fpsyg-10-01895-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/423873c70826/fpsyg-10-01895-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/c568eec630af/fpsyg-10-01895-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/293591f4c4a9/fpsyg-10-01895-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/e386a3c7954c/fpsyg-10-01895-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/cbb36a9fbe89/fpsyg-10-01895-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/4c28a3537fe0/fpsyg-10-01895-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/c40a49e4fc91/fpsyg-10-01895-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/423873c70826/fpsyg-10-01895-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/c568eec630af/fpsyg-10-01895-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/293591f4c4a9/fpsyg-10-01895-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/e386a3c7954c/fpsyg-10-01895-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/cbb36a9fbe89/fpsyg-10-01895-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543c/6707334/4c28a3537fe0/fpsyg-10-01895-g0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Score Predictor Factor Analysis: Reproducing Observed Covariances by Means of Factor Score Predictors.评分预测因子分析:通过因子得分预测器再现观测协方差。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 16;10:1895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01895. eCollection 2019.
2
Extending the Debate Between Spearman and Wilson 1929: When do Single Variables Optimally Reproduce the Common Part of the Observed Covariances?
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(5):555-67. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1059311.
3
Note on Convergence of Minres.关于Minres收敛性的注释
Multivariate Behav Res. 1988 Jul 1;23(3):413-7. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2303_8.
4
The Trade-Off Between Factor Score Determinacy and the Preservation of Inter-Factor Correlations.因子得分确定性与因子间相关性保持之间的权衡
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Apr;84(2):289-313. doi: 10.1177/00131644231171137. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
5
Algorithm 937: MINRES-QLP for Symmetric and Hermitian Linear Equations and Least-Squares Problems.算法937:用于对称和埃尔米特线性方程及最小二乘问题的MINRES-QLP算法
ACM Trans Math Softw. 2014 Feb;40(2). doi: 10.1145/2527267.
6
Model-related factor score predictors for confirmatory factor analysis.模型相关因子得分预测确认性因子分析。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 Nov;62(Pt 3):489-506. doi: 10.1348/000711008X336146. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
7
Estimating model error covariances using particle filters.使用粒子滤波器估计模型误差协方差。
Q J R Meteorol Soc. 2018 Apr;144(713):1310-1320. doi: 10.1002/qj.3132. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
Improved approximation and visualization of the correlation matrix.相关矩阵的改进近似与可视化。
Am Stat. 2023;77(4):432-442. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2023.2186952. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
9
Large Covariance Estimation by Thresholding Principal Orthogonal Complements.通过阈值化主正交补进行大协方差估计
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2013 Sep 1;75(4). doi: 10.1111/rssb.12016.
10
Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.脑磁图(MEG)和脑电图(EEG)信号协方差估计和空间白化的自动模型选择。
Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:328-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.040. Epub 2014 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis.评估探索性项目因子分析中因子解和因子得分估计的质量与适宜性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):762-780. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719308. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
2
Varimax Rotation Based on Gradient Projection Is a Feasible Alternative to SPSS.基于梯度投影的方差最大化旋转是SPSS的一种可行替代方法。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 26;10:645. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00645. eCollection 2019.
3
Factor Indeterminacy as Metrological Uncertainty: Implications for Advancing Psychological Measurement.
因子不定性作为计量不确定性:对推进心理测量的启示。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 May-Jun;54(3):429-443. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1535420. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
4
Some Results on Mean Square Error for Factor Score Prediction.因子得分预测的均方误差的一些结果。
Psychometrika. 2006 Jun;71(2):395-409. doi: 10.1007/s11336-004-1220-7. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
5
An Empirical Comparison of Factor, Image, Component, and Scale Scores.因子得分、意象得分、成分得分和量表得分的实证比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 1992 Jul 1;27(3):301-22. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2703_1.
6
2001 Presidential Address: Working with Imperfect Models.2001年主席致辞:与不完美的模型合作。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2003 Jan 1;38(1):113-39. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3801_5.
7
Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some issues in Selecting an Appropriate Procedure.成分分析与共同因素分析:选择适当程序的一些问题。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Jan 1;25(1):1-28. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_1.
8
Extending the Debate Between Spearman and Wilson 1929: When do Single Variables Optimally Reproduce the Common Part of the Observed Covariances?
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(5):555-67. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1059311.
9
Computing and evaluating factor scores.计算和评估因子得分。
Psychol Methods. 2001 Dec;6(4):430-50.
10
Factor analysis by minimizing residuals (minres).通过最小化残差进行因子分析(最小残差法)。
Psychometrika. 1966 Sep;31(3):351-68. doi: 10.1007/BF02289468.