The African Centre for Migration & Society, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Jan;28(1):60-68. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12840. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
Reflecting global trends, migrant farm workers in South Africa experience challenges in accessing healthcare. On the commercial farms in Musina, a sub-district bordering Zimbabwe, Medécins sans Frontières and the International Organization for Migration both implemented migration-aware community-based programmes that included the training of community-based healthcare workers, to address these challenges. Using qualitative data, this paper explores the experiences that migrant farm workers, specifically those involved in the programmes, had of these interventions. A total of 79 semi-structured interviews were completed with migrant farm workers, farm managers, NGO employees and civil servants between January 2017 and July 2018. These data were supplemented by a review of grey and published literature, as well as observation and field notes. Findings indicate that participants were primarily positive about the interventions. However, since the departure of both Medécins sans Frontières and the International Organization for Migration, community members have struggled to sustain the projects and the structural differences between the two programmes have created tensions. This paper highlights the ways in which local interventions that mobilise community members can improve the access that rural, migrant farming communities have to healthcare. However, it simultaneously points to the ways in which these interventions are unsustainable given the realities of non-state interventions and the fragmented state approach to community-based healthcare workers. The findings presented in this paper support global calls for the inclusion of migration and health in government policy making at all levels. However, findings also capture the limitations of community-based interventions that do not recognise community-based healthcare workers as social actors and fail to take into account their motivations, desires and need for continued supervision. As such, ensuring that the ways in which migration and health are included in policy making are sustainable emerges as a necessary element to be included in global calls.
反映全球趋势,南非的移民农场工人在获得医疗保健方面面临挑战。在与津巴布韦接壤的穆西纳分区的商业农场,无国界医生组织和国际移民组织都实施了以移徙为重点的社区为基础的方案,包括培训社区卫生工作者,以应对这些挑战。本文使用定性数据探讨了移民农场工人(特别是参与这些方案的工人)对这些干预措施的体验。2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月期间,共完成了 79 名移民农场工人、农场经理、非政府组织员工和公务员的半结构式访谈。这些数据补充了灰色和已发表文献的审查,以及观察和实地记录。调查结果表明,参与者对这些干预措施主要持积极态度。然而,自从无国界医生组织和国际移民组织离开后,社区成员一直在努力维持这些项目,而且两个项目之间的结构差异造成了紧张局势。本文强调了动员社区成员的地方干预措施可以如何改善农村移民农业社区获得医疗保健的途径。然而,它同时指出,鉴于非国家干预的现实以及对社区为基础的医疗工作者的零碎国家办法,这些干预措施是不可持续的。本文提出的调查结果支持了在各级政府决策中纳入移徙和健康问题的全球呼吁。然而,调查结果还反映了那些不承认社区为基础的医疗工作者是社会行为者的社区为基础的干预措施的局限性,也没有考虑到他们的动机、愿望和对持续监督的需求。因此,确保将移徙和健康问题纳入决策的可持续性成为全球呼吁的一个必要组成部分。