Suppr超能文献

[通过希氏束电灼消除房室传导。一种简化技术的建议。附70例报告]

[Ablation of atrio-ventricular conduction by fulguration of the His bundle. Proposal for a simplified technic. Apropos of 70 cases].

作者信息

Clementy J, Moreau C, Douart H, Coste P, Bricaud H

机构信息

Départment d'électrophysiologie, hôpital cardiologique, université de Bordeaux II, Pessac.

出版信息

Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1988 Dec;81(12):1483-90.

PMID:3147638
Abstract

Between 1982 and 1987, 70 patients (32 men, 38 women, aged from 45 to 93 years) underwent catheter ablation of His bundle and were followed up for more than 3 months. The disorders treated were atrial fibrillation, flutter of tachycardia (62 cases), junctional tachycardia (7 cases) and refractory atrial extrasystoles (1 case). The overall results were: early failure in 1 case, late death in 3 cases, persistent high degree AV block in 53 cases (75 p. 100), 1st degree AV block in 9 cases (12 p. 100) and failure in 8 cases (13 p. 100). Two techniques were used. In the first 30 patients ablation was performed by tri- or quadripolar catheters with electrodes 10 mm apart (USCI 2943/2854) and localization by an unipolar electrode connected to the negative pole of the defibrillator. The mid-term results in this series were: complete AV block in 20 cases (66 p. 100), partial AV block in 5 cases (17 p. 100) and failure in 17 cases (17 p. 100). In the last 40 patients localization was bipolar and ablation was obtained with simultaneous bipolar leads taken from a Josephson catheter with electrodes 5 mm apart (USCI 8567); the two electrodes recording the highest His bundle potential were connected to the negative pole of the defibrillator. The results in these series were: complete AV block in 33 cases (82 p. 100), partial AV block in 4 cases (11 p. 100) and failure in 3 cases (7 p. 100). Although the two series were not exactly similar, it seems permissible to recommend the second, more convenient technique.

摘要

1982年至1987年间,70例患者(32例男性,38例女性,年龄45至93岁)接受了希氏束导管消融术,并进行了超过3个月的随访。治疗的疾病包括心房颤动、心动过速性扑动(62例)、交界性心动过速(7例)和难治性房性期前收缩(1例)。总体结果为:早期失败1例,晚期死亡3例,持续性高度房室传导阻滞53例(75%),一度房室传导阻滞9例(12%),失败8例(13%)。使用了两种技术。在前30例患者中,使用电极间距为10毫米的三极或四极导管(USCI 2943/2854)进行消融,并通过连接到除颤器负极的单极电极进行定位。该组的中期结果为:完全性房室传导阻滞20例(66%),部分性房室传导阻滞5例(17%),失败17例(17%)。在最后40例患者中,采用双极定位,使用电极间距为5毫米的约瑟夫森导管同时获取双极导联进行消融(USCI 8567);记录最高希氏束电位的两个电极连接到除颤器负极。该组结果为:完全性房室传导阻滞33例(82%),部分性房室传导阻滞4例(11%),失败3例(7%)。尽管两组并不完全相同,但似乎可以推荐第二种更简便的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验