• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族和民族与血管通路类型选择及结局的关联

Association of Race and Ethnicity with Vascular Access Type Selection and Outcomes.

作者信息

Copeland Timothy P, Hye Robert J, Lawrence Peter F, Woo Karen

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.08.068. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.08.068
PMID:31476426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6911628/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Black patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) represent 30.5% of the prevalent ESRD population in the United States, despite only accounting for 18% of the total population. Black patients are less likely to have pre-ESRD care compared with their white counterparts and are 3-4 times more likely to progress from chronic kidney disease to ESRD than whites, suggesting that black patients are particularly vulnerable to disparities in outcomes related to hemodialysis and ESRD. The objective of this study is to examine the association of race with outcomes of hemodialysis access and selection of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) versus arteriovenous graft (AVG).

METHODS

Patients with chronic kidney disease who initiated dialysis through a tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) were identified in the Optum's De-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN) claims database (2011-2017). The odds of AVF versus AVG creation and the odds of repeat vascular access creation were analyzed using logistic regression. Time from initial AVF/AVG to THC removal and time to repeat AVF/AVG were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

About 7,584 vascular access patients met the inclusion criteria: 5,852 (77%) AVF and 1,732 (23%) AVG. Median follow-up was 583 days overall (range, 1-2,543), 589 days among AVF patients (range, 1-2,543), and 260 days among AVG patients (range, 1-2,529). Between races, there was no clinically significant variation in characteristics or comorbidities, with the exception of a much lower rate of obesity among Asians. Black patients had 36% lower odds of AVF index versus AVG index (P < 0.001). Patients 70 years or older and patients with diabetes had lower odds of AVF index, whereas men and obese patients had greater odds of receiving AVF. Overall, graft patients were 73% more likely to have a shorter time to THC removal than fistula patients, but Hispanic graft patients were 25% more likely to have a shorter time to THC removal than whites. Patients with diabetes, patients with cardiac arrhythmia, and obesity were more likely to have a longer time to THC removal. About 1,589 (21%) patients underwent a repeat vascular access creation during the follow-up period: 19% of whites (n = 802), 26% of blacks (n = 483), 19% of Hispanics (n = 250), and 19% of Asians (n = 54) (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that black patients had 58% greater odds of requiring a second access than white patients (P < 0.001). Graft patients, patients 70 years or older, and men had lower odds of repeat access. Black patients were 45% more likely to have a shorter time until second access creation. Graft patients, patients aged 70 years or older, and men were more likely to have a longer time until second access. Patients with obesity were more likely to have a shorter time until second access.

CONCLUSIONS

This study's findings suggest that after initial vascular access, compared with whites, blacks have no difference in time to index access success, but their access fails earlier and more frequently, independent of access type, age, and comorbidities. Given blacks constitute 30.5% of the hemodialysis population in the United States, it is imperative that future research investigate the root causes of these disparities.

摘要

背景

在美国,患有终末期肾病(ESRD)的黑人患者占ESRD流行人群的30.5%,尽管其仅占总人口的18%。与白人患者相比,黑人患者接受ESRD前期护理的可能性较小,且从慢性肾病进展为ESRD的可能性是白人的3至4倍,这表明黑人患者在血液透析和ESRD相关结局方面特别容易出现差异。本研究的目的是探讨种族与血液透析通路结局以及动静脉内瘘(AVF)与动静脉移植物(AVG)选择之间的关联。

方法

在Optum的去识别化临床信息学数据集市(OptumInsight,明尼苏达州伊甸草原)的索赔数据库(2011 - 2017年)中识别出通过隧道式血液透析导管(THC)开始透析的慢性肾病患者。使用逻辑回归分析创建AVF与AVG的几率以及再次进行血管通路创建的几率。使用Cox比例风险模型分析从初始AVF/AVG到移除THC的时间以及再次进行AVF/AVG的时间。

结果

约7584例血管通路患者符合纳入标准:5852例(77%)为AVF,1732例(23%)为AVG。总体中位随访时间为583天(范围1 - 2543天),AVF患者为589天(范围1 - 2543天),AVG患者为260天(范围1 - 2529天)。在不同种族之间,除亚洲人的肥胖率低得多外,特征或合并症无临床显著差异。黑人患者创建AVF与AVG的几率低36%(P < 0.001)。70岁及以上患者和糖尿病患者创建AVF的几率较低,而男性和肥胖患者接受AVF的几率较高。总体而言,移植物患者移除THC的时间比内瘘患者短73%,但西班牙裔移植物患者移除THC的时间比白人短25%。糖尿病患者、心律失常患者和肥胖患者移除THC的时间更长。在随访期间,约1589例(21%)患者进行了再次血管通路创建:白人的比例为19%(n = 802),黑人的比例为26%(n = 483),西班牙裔的比例为19%(n = 250),亚洲人的比例为19%(n = 54)(P < 0.001)。多变量分析表明,黑人患者需要第二次通路的几率比白人高58%(P < 0.001)。移植物患者、70岁及以上患者和男性再次进行通路创建的几率较低。黑人患者进行第二次通路创建的时间缩短45%。移植物患者、70岁及以上患者和男性进行第二次通路创建的时间更长。肥胖患者进行第二次通路创建的时间更短。

结论

本研究结果表明,在初始血管通路建立后,与白人相比,黑人在首次通路成功的时间上没有差异,但他们的通路更早且更频繁地失败,这与通路类型、年龄和合并症无关。鉴于黑人占美国血液透析人群的30.5%,未来的研究必须调查这些差异的根本原因。

相似文献

1
Association of Race and Ethnicity with Vascular Access Type Selection and Outcomes.种族和民族与血管通路类型选择及结局的关联
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.08.068. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
2
Outcomes of initial hemodialysis vascular access in patients initiating dialysis with a tunneled catheter.隧道导管开始透析患者初始血液透析血管通路的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;70(4):1235-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.036. Epub 2019 May 27.
3
Incidence and risk factors of sepsis in hemodialysis patients in the United States.美国血液透析患者中脓毒症的发生率及危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):1016-1021.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.126. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Variations in outcomes of hemodialysis vascular access by race/ethnicity in the elderly.老年人中按种族/民族划分的血液透析血管通路结局差异
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):783-792.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.054. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
5
Association of race and ethnicity with initial surgical hemodialysis access type in a safety net system.安全网系统中种族和族裔与初始外科血液透析通路类型的关联
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1493-1497.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
6
Sex, race, and hemodialysis vascular access processes.性别、种族与血液透析血管通路建立过程
J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 21;18(2):132-138. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000657. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
7
Tradeoffs in Vascular Access Selection in Elderly Patients Initiating Hemodialysis With a Catheter.老年血液透析患者导管置管时血管通路选择的权衡。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Oct;72(4):509-518. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Catheter Dependence After Arteriovenous Fistula or Graft Placement Among Elderly Patients on Hemodialysis.老年血液透析患者动静脉瘘或移植物置管后的导管依赖。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2021 Sep;78(3):399-408.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.12.019. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
9
Arteriovenous grafts are associated with earlier catheter removal and fewer catheter days in the United States Renal Data System population.在美国肾脏数据系统人群中,动静脉移植物与导管拔除时间更早和导管使用天数更少相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jul;62(1):123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
10
Racial/Ethnic Disparities Associated With Initial Hemodialysis Access.与初始血液透析通路相关的种族/民族差异。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jun;150(6):529-36. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0287.

引用本文的文献

1
New Frontiers in Vascular Access Practice: From Standardized to Patient-tailored Care and Shared Decision Making.血管通路实践的新前沿:从标准化到个体化患者护理和共同决策。
Kidney360. 2021 Jun 15;2(8):1380-1389. doi: 10.34067/KID.0002882021. eCollection 2021 Aug 26.
2
Expert consensus on the establishment and maintenance of native arteriovenous fistula.自体动静脉内瘘建立与维护的专家共识
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2021 Jun 16;7(4):235-253. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2021.05.002. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Challenges and novel therapies for vascular access in haemodialysis.血液透析血管通路的挑战和新疗法。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Oct;16(10):586-602. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-0333-2. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Race and Sex Disparities in Outcomes of Dialysis Access Maintenance Interventions.种族和性别差异对透析通路维护干预结果的影响。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Apr;29(4):476-481.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.10.018. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
2
Racial disparities after infrainguinal bypass surgery in hemodialysis patients.血液透析患者下肢旁路手术后的种族差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4):1163-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.044. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
3
Hemodialysis Disparities in African Americans: The Deeply Integrated Concept of Race in the Social Fabric of Our Society.非裔美国人的血液透析差异:种族在我们社会结构中深度融合的概念。
Semin Dial. 2017 May;30(3):213-223. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12589. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Bovine carotid artery biologic graft outperforms expanded polytetrafluoroethylene for hemodialysis access.牛颈动脉生物移植物在用于血液透析通路方面优于膨体聚四氟乙烯。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):775-782. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.080.
5
Variations in outcomes of hemodialysis vascular access by race/ethnicity in the elderly.老年人中按种族/民族划分的血液透析血管通路结局差异
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):783-792.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.054. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
6
Vascular access choice in incident hemodialysis patients: a decision analysis.初发血液透析患者的血管通路选择:决策分析。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jan;26(1):183-91. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013111236. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
7
Racial disparity in early graft failure after infrainguinal bypass.股腘以下旁路术后早期移植物失败的种族差异。
J Surg Res. 2014 Jul;190(1):335-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.029. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
8
Effect of race and insurance status on outcomes after vascular access placement for hemodialysis.种族和保险状况对血液透析血管通路置入术后结局的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 May;28(4):964-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
9
Ethnic differences in arm vein diameter and arteriovenous fistula creation rates in men undergoing hemodialysis access.男性血液透析患者手臂静脉直径和动静脉瘘创建率的种族差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;56(2):424-31; discussion 431-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.029. Epub 2012 May 1.
10
Hispanic ethnicity and vascular access use in patients initiating hemodialysis in the United States.美国开始血液透析患者的西班牙裔族群和血管通路使用情况。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Feb;7(2):289-96. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08370811. Epub 2011 Nov 23.