Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;40(5):609-613. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1634019. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
In this study, we conducted a retrospective investigation of all cases of placenta previa and accreta that were treated at a tertiary-level hospital to assess the effectiveness of balloon catheterisation at different levels. We evaluated the surgical and neonatal outcomes of 586 cases of placenta previa and accreta that were treated at our facility. This is the largest study of its kind. Depending on the severity and position of accreta, patients underwent balloon catheter placement in the aorta ( = 252) or common iliac artery ( = 38) before delivery by caesarean section. Data were collected regarding the duration of the surgery, number of cases (percentage) of balloon occlusion, and annual rate of hysterectomy. The blood loss (2207.89 ± 2044.95 ml) and transfusion volume (7.42 ± 7.872 U) in the common iliac occlusion group was greater than those in the aortic occlusion group (1967.66 ± 1466.64 ml and 6.54 ± 5.67 U, respectively); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance ( > .05). With the increase in the number of procedures performed over the years of study, the surgeons' skills improved significantly. The choice of balloon catheterisation must be made with careful consideration. Our results highlight the significance of suture skill and the experience level of surgeons.IMPACT STATEMENT The optimal method for the management of placenta accreta remains debateable. Prophylactic balloon catheters placed within arteries to control intraoperative bleeding play an important role in the management of patients with placenta accreta. The common iliac artery occlusion group tended to have a greater amount of blood loss and a higher requirement of transfusion than the aortic occlusion group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. We also analysed the difference in the complications across different periods of the study period and observed a clear improvement in the operative procedures over time. Our study revealed that the surgeons' proficiency increases over time, leading to improved results and a lower rate of hysterectomy over the course of several years. We recommend that the choice for balloon catheter occlusion be made with caution and after careful consideration.
在这项研究中,我们对在一家三级医院治疗的所有前置胎盘和胎盘植入病例进行了回顾性调查,以评估不同水平的球囊导管置入术的效果。我们评估了在我们医院治疗的 586 例前置胎盘和胎盘植入病例的手术和新生儿结局。这是此类研究中规模最大的一次。根据植入的严重程度和位置,患者在剖宫产前分别在主动脉(=252 例)或髂总动脉(=38 例)中放置球囊导管。收集了手术持续时间、球囊闭塞病例数(百分比)和每年子宫切除术率的数据。髂总动脉闭塞组的出血量(2207.89±2044.95ml)和输血量(7.42±7.872U)大于主动脉闭塞组(1967.66±1466.64ml 和 6.54±5.67U),但差异无统计学意义(>.05)。随着研究年份中手术数量的增加,外科医生的技能显著提高。球囊导管置入的选择必须慎重考虑。我们的结果强调了缝合技术和外科医生经验水平的重要性。
影响陈述
前置胎盘管理的最佳方法仍存在争议。预防性放置在动脉内的球囊导管控制术中出血在胎盘植入患者的管理中起着重要作用。髂总动脉闭塞组的出血量和输血需求往往大于主动脉闭塞组;然而,这种差异没有统计学意义。我们还分析了研究期间不同时期并发症的差异,并观察到手术操作随着时间的推移明显改善。我们的研究表明,外科医生的熟练程度随着时间的推移而提高,导致在几年的时间里,手术结果得到改善,子宫切除术的比例降低。我们建议谨慎选择球囊导管闭塞,并在仔细考虑后做出决定。