Suppr超能文献

蓝莓中黄单胞菌属的不同分子和血清学检测方法的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of different molecular and serological methods for detection of Xylella fastidiosa in blueberry.

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, United States of America.

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Sep 3;14(9):e0221903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221903. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Bacterial leaf scorch, caused by Xylella fastidiosa, is a major threat to blueberry production in the southeastern United States. Management of this devastating disease is challenging and often requires early detection of the pathogen to reduce major loss. There are several different molecular and serological detection methods available to identify the pathogen. Knowing the efficiency and suitability of these detection techniques for application in both field and laboratory conditions is important when selecting the appropriate detection tool. Here, we compared the efficiency and the functionality of four different molecular detection techniques (PCR, real-time PCR, LAMP and AmplifyRP® Acceler8™) and one serological detection technique (DAS-ELISA). The most sensitive method was found to be real-time PCR with the detection limit of 25 fg of DNA molecules per reaction (≈9 genome copies), followed by LAMP at 250 fg per reaction (≈90 copies), AmplifyRP® Acceler8™ at 1 pg per reaction (≈350 copies), conventional PCR with nearly 1.25 pg per reaction (≈ 440 copies) and DAS-ELISA with 1x105 cfu/mL of Xylella fastidiosa. Validation between assays with 10 experimental samples gave consistent results beyond the variation of the detection limit. Considering robustness, portability, and cost, LAMP and AmplifyRP® Acceler8™ were not only the fastest methods but also portable to the field and didn't require any skilled labor to carry out. Among those two, AmplifyRP® Acceler8™ was faster but more expensive and less sensitive than LAMP. On the other hand, real-time PCR was the most sensitive assay and required comparatively lesser time than C-PCR and DAS-ELISA, which were the least sensitive assays in this study, but all three assays are not portable and needed skilled labor to proceed. These findings should enable growers, agents, and diagnosticians to make informed decisions regarding the selection of an appropriate diagnostic tool for X. fastidiosa on blueberry.

摘要

细菌性叶斑病由韧皮部难养菌(Xylella fastidiosa)引起,是美国东南部蓝莓生产的主要威胁。这种破坏性疾病的管理具有挑战性,通常需要早期检测病原体,以减少重大损失。有几种不同的分子和血清学检测方法可用于鉴定病原体。在选择适当的检测工具时,了解这些检测技术在田间和实验室条件下的效率和适用性非常重要。在这里,我们比较了四种不同的分子检测技术(PCR、实时 PCR、LAMP 和 AmplifyRP® Acceler8™)和一种血清学检测技术(DAS-ELISA)的效率和功能。最敏感的方法是实时 PCR,其检测限为每个反应 25 fg 的 DNA 分子(≈9 个基因组拷贝),其次是 LAMP,每个反应 250 fg(≈90 个拷贝),AmplifyRP® Acceler8™每个反应 1 pg(≈350 个拷贝),常规 PCR 每个反应接近 1.25 pg(≈440 个拷贝),DAS-ELISA 为 Xylella fastidiosa 的 1x105 cfu/mL。用 10 个实验样本对检测方法进行验证,结果一致,超出了检测限的变化范围。考虑到稳健性、便携性和成本,LAMP 和 AmplifyRP® Acceler8™不仅是最快的方法,而且可以在现场携带,并且不需要任何熟练的劳动力来进行。在这两种方法中,AmplifyRP® Acceler8™ 速度更快,但比 LAMP 更昂贵且灵敏度更低。另一方面,实时 PCR 是最敏感的检测方法,与 C-PCR 和 DAS-ELISA 相比,所需时间相对较少,而 C-PCR 和 DAS-ELISA 是本研究中最不敏感的检测方法,但这三种检测方法都不便于携带,并且需要熟练的劳动力才能进行。这些发现应该使种植者、代理商和诊断人员能够就蓝莓上韧皮部难养菌的合适诊断工具的选择做出明智的决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c25/6719857/39c33a0d5dbb/pone.0221903.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验