Laboratory of Animal Cell Technology, Faculty of Life Science and Technology, Fukuyama University, Higashimuracho, Aza, Sanzo, 985, Fukuyama 729-0292, Japan; School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia; South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2019 Dec;141:106605. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106605. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
The origin of the mammalian order Eulipotyphla has been debated intensively with arguments around whether they began diversifying before or after the Cretaceous-Palaeogene (K-Pg) boundary at 66 Ma. Here, we used an in-solution nucleotide capture method and next generation DNA sequencing to determine the sequence of hundreds of ultra-conserved elements (UCEs), and conducted phylogenomic and molecular dating analyses for the four extant eulipotyphlan lineages-Erinaceidae, Solenodontidae, Soricidae, and Talpidae. Concatenated maximum-likelihood analyses with single or partitioned models and a coalescent species-tree analysis showed that divergences among the four major eulipotyphlan lineages occurred within a short period of evolutionary time, but did not resolve the interrelationships among them. Alternative suboptimal phylogenetic hypotheses received consistently the same amount of support from different UCE loci, and were not significantly different from the maximum likelihood tree topology, suggesting the prevalence of stochastic lineage sorting. Molecular dating analyses that incorporated among-lineage evolutionary rate differences supported a scenario where the four eulipotyphlan families diversified between 57.8 and 63.2 Ma. Given short branch lengths with low support values, traces of rampant genome-wide stochastic lineage sorting, and post K-Pg diversification, we concluded that the crown eulipotyphlan lineages arose through a rapid diversification after the K-Pg boundary when novel niches were created by the mass extinction of species.
哺乳动物食虫目起源的问题一直存在争议,争论的焦点是它们是在 6600 万年前白垩纪-古近纪(K-Pg)边界之前还是之后开始多样化的。在这里,我们使用溶液核苷酸捕获方法和下一代 DNA 测序来确定数百个超保守元件(UCE)的序列,并对现存的四个食虫目谱系——猬科、鼹科、鼩鼱科和鼹科——进行了系统发育和分子定年分析。使用单模型或分区模型的串联最大似然分析和合并种系树分析表明,这四个主要食虫目谱系之间的分歧发生在很短的进化时间内,但并没有解决它们之间的相互关系。替代的次优系统发育假说从不同的 UCE 位点得到了相同数量的支持,与最大似然树拓扑没有显著差异,这表明随机谱系分类的普遍性。纳入谱系间进化率差异的分子定年分析支持了这样一种情景,即四个食虫目科在 57.8 到 63.2 百万年前多样化。考虑到分支长度短且支持值低、广泛存在的全基因组随机谱系分类的痕迹,以及 K-Pg 多样化之后,我们得出结论,冠食虫目谱系是在 K-Pg 边界之后通过快速多样化而产生的,当时物种的大规模灭绝创造了新的生态位。