Suppr超能文献

护理诊断及定义性特征的识别:两种研究模式

Identification of nursing diagnoses and defining characteristics: two research models.

作者信息

Woodtli A

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1988 Dec;11(6):399-406. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770110608.

Abstract

Nursing diagnoses and their defining characteristics associated with one Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) were identified and validated. The clinical-retrospective model and the nurse validation model were used to identify high-volume nursing diagnoses associated with DRG 366, transurethral prostatectomy, and to validate related defining characteristics. For the clinical-retrospective model, 34 patient records classified as DRG 366 were reviewed, nursing diagnoses and their associated defining characteristics were identified and retrospectively validated. The nurse-validation model was implemented by assessing nine patients within DRG 366 over 22 shifts. Analysis using descriptive statistics demonstrated 80% level of agreement on five most frequently identified nursing diagnoses, but lack of agreement on the associated defining characteristics.

摘要

确定并验证了与一个诊断相关组(DRG)相关的护理诊断及其定义特征。采用临床回顾性模型和护士验证模型来确定与DRG 366(经尿道前列腺切除术)相关的高频率护理诊断,并验证相关的定义特征。对于临床回顾性模型,审查了34份分类为DRG 366的患者记录,确定了护理诊断及其相关的定义特征,并进行了回顾性验证。护士验证模型是通过在22个轮班期间评估DRG 366内的9名患者来实施的。使用描述性统计分析表明,在五个最常确定的护理诊断上,一致性水平为80%,但在相关的定义特征上缺乏一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验