• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理诊断及定义性特征的识别:两种研究模式

Identification of nursing diagnoses and defining characteristics: two research models.

作者信息

Woodtli A

机构信息

College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1988 Dec;11(6):399-406. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770110608.

DOI:10.1002/nur.4770110608
PMID:3148162
Abstract

Nursing diagnoses and their defining characteristics associated with one Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) were identified and validated. The clinical-retrospective model and the nurse validation model were used to identify high-volume nursing diagnoses associated with DRG 366, transurethral prostatectomy, and to validate related defining characteristics. For the clinical-retrospective model, 34 patient records classified as DRG 366 were reviewed, nursing diagnoses and their associated defining characteristics were identified and retrospectively validated. The nurse-validation model was implemented by assessing nine patients within DRG 366 over 22 shifts. Analysis using descriptive statistics demonstrated 80% level of agreement on five most frequently identified nursing diagnoses, but lack of agreement on the associated defining characteristics.

摘要

确定并验证了与一个诊断相关组(DRG)相关的护理诊断及其定义特征。采用临床回顾性模型和护士验证模型来确定与DRG 366(经尿道前列腺切除术)相关的高频率护理诊断,并验证相关的定义特征。对于临床回顾性模型,审查了34份分类为DRG 366的患者记录,确定了护理诊断及其相关的定义特征,并进行了回顾性验证。护士验证模型是通过在22个轮班期间评估DRG 366内的9名患者来实施的。使用描述性统计分析表明,在五个最常确定的护理诊断上,一致性水平为80%,但在相关的定义特征上缺乏一致性。

相似文献

1
Identification of nursing diagnoses and defining characteristics: two research models.护理诊断及定义性特征的识别:两种研究模式
Res Nurs Health. 1988 Dec;11(6):399-406. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770110608.
2
Staff nurse identification of nursing diagnosis from a written case study.注册护士从书面病例研究中识别护理诊断。
Nurs Diagn. 1992 Jan-Mar;3(1):30-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1992.tb00195.x.
3
A methodology for validating nursing diagnoses.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1990 Apr;12(3):65-74. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199004000-00007.
4
[DRG--nursing diagnoses as an opportunity].
Krankenpfl Soins Infirm. 2009;102(11):18-21.
5
Using magnitude estimation scaling to examine the validity of nursing diagnoses.
Nurs Diagn. 1990 Apr-Jun;1(2):64-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1990.tb00240.x.
6
Validation of defining characteristics of four nursing diagnoses using a computerized data base.使用计算机数据库对四种护理诊断的定义特征进行验证。
J Prof Nurs. 1991 Sep-Oct;7(5):293-9. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(91)90116-3.
7
Field trials of the phenomena of concern for psychiatric/mental health nursing: proposed methodology.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1989 Oct;3(5):305-8.
8
Identifying critical defining characteristics of nursing diagnoses using magnitude estimation scaling.使用量值估计量表确定护理诊断的关键定义特征。
Res Nurs Health. 1989 Dec;12(6):373-80. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770120607.
9
Nursing diagnosis research: computer-aided research in nursing.
Nurs Diagn. 1994 Jan-Mar;5(1):6-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1994.tb00362.x.
10
Clinical validation of ineffective breathing pattern, ineffective airway clearance, and impaired gas exchange.无效呼吸模式、无效气道清除及气体交换受损的临床验证。
Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(3):243-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01299.x.