• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本老年子宫内膜癌患者初始治疗策略的真实世界数据。

Real-world data on initial treatment strategies for older adult patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation of Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koutou-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;84(5):1051-1058. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03938-8. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00280-019-03938-8
PMID:31482227
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current strategies for the treatment of endometrial cancer in older adult patients require re-evaluation given the global trend in population aging, especially in Japan. We sought to evaluate initial treatment offered to older adult patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data on the standard treatment by age group in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery between January 2005 and December 2013 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). Patients were stratified into four groups according to age: a younger group, aged 64 years or younger; older adult group 1, aged 65-69 years; older adult group 2, aged 70-74 years; and older adult group 3, aged ≥75 years.

RESULTS

Among 551 patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed and treated at our hospital, data from 531 eligible patients were analyzed. The proportion of patients in the older adult groups 1 or 2 who received standard treatment was the same as in the younger group. However, significantly fewer patients in older adult group 3 received standard treatment compared with the younger group (26% vs. 71%, p = 0.0001). Furthermore, the proportion of patients in older adult group 3 who underwent standard surgery was significantly lower than that in the younger group (26% vs. 72%, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that age 75 years and older might represent a cutoff for the development of age-based treatment strategies for endometrial cancer. This information could be used to determine the upper age limit for participation in clinical trials in Japan.

摘要

目的

鉴于全球人口老龄化趋势,尤其是在日本,需要重新评估目前针对老年子宫内膜癌患者的治疗策略。我们旨在评估日本老年子宫内膜癌患者的初始治疗方法。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2005 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月在日本国家癌症中心医院接受手术的子宫内膜癌患者按年龄分组的标准治疗数据。根据年龄将患者分为四组:年龄<65 岁的年轻组、65-69 岁的老年组 1、70-74 岁的老年组 2 和≥75 岁的老年组 3。

结果

在我院诊断和治疗的 551 例子宫内膜癌患者中,有 531 例符合条件的患者数据被分析。老年组 1 或 2 患者接受标准治疗的比例与年轻组相同。然而,老年组 3 患者接受标准治疗的比例明显低于年轻组(26% vs. 71%,p=0.0001)。此外,老年组 3 患者接受标准手术的比例明显低于年轻组(26% vs. 72%,p=0.0001)。

结论

这些结果表明,年龄≥75 岁可能是制定基于年龄的子宫内膜癌治疗策略的截止点。这些信息可用于确定日本临床试验的年龄上限。

相似文献

1
Real-world data on initial treatment strategies for older adult patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.日本老年子宫内膜癌患者初始治疗策略的真实世界数据。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;84(5):1051-1058. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03938-8. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
The Clinical Features of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer in Japan: Chemotherapy Instead of Radiotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment.日本复发性子宫内膜癌的临床特征:化疗而非放疗作为术后辅助治疗。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Oct;28(8):1616-1623. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001346.
3
Feasibility of initial treatment in elderly patients with ovarian cancer in Japan: a retrospective study.日本老年卵巢癌患者初始治疗的可行性:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;24(9):1111-1118. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01449-3. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation.年龄对接受术后放疗的子宫内膜癌患者长期预后的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Oct;103(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.01.038. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
5
Net Survival of Elderly Patients with Gynecological Cancer Aged Over 75 Years in 2006-2008.2006 - 2008年75岁以上老年妇科癌症患者的净生存率
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Feb 26;20(2):437-442. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.437.
6
Assessing the effect of guideline introduction on clinical practice and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer in Japan: a project of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guideline evaluation committee.评估指南引入对日本子宫内膜癌患者临床实践及预后的影响:日本妇科肿瘤学会(JSGO)指南评估委员会的一项项目
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;28(6):e76. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e76.
7
Management of endometrial cancer in patients aged 80 years and older: Identifying patients who may benefit from a curative treatment.80 岁及以上子宫内膜癌患者的管理:确定可能从治愈性治疗中获益的患者。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Nov;242:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
8
Pathologic and Treatment Outcomes Among a Geriatric Population of Endometrial Cancer Patients: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Ancillary Data Analysis of LAP2.老年子宫内膜癌患者的病理及治疗结果:LAP2的NRG肿瘤学/妇科肿瘤学组辅助数据分析
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 May;27(4):730-737. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000947.
9
Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.年龄对子宫内膜癌治疗中手术分期及手术方式(剖腹手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人手术)的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):703-709. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.022. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
10
Comparative outcomes in older and younger women undergoing laparotomy or robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer.老年和年轻女性接受开腹或机器人手术分期治疗子宫内膜癌的比较结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):350.e1-350.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.085. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with positive peritoneal cytology in stage IA endometrial cancer.IA 期子宫内膜癌腹膜细胞学阳性患者的预后和辅助化疗。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 7;12(1):166. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03975-5.
2
The role of histogram analysis in diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.直方图分析在扩散加权成像鉴别良恶性乳腺病变中的作用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01257-0.