Suppr超能文献

成人疑似急性阑尾炎的 MDCT 阳性口服对比剂:正常和发炎阑尾的阑尾腔充盈率。

Positive Oral Contrast Solution at MDCT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Rate of Appendiceal Luminal Filling of Normal and Inflamed Appendixes.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252.

Radia, Lynwood, WA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Nov;213(5):W211-W217. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.21019. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of appendiceal filling with a positive oral contrast solution at MDCT performed for suspected acute appendicitis in adults. We performed a retrospective review of MDCT in 684 consecutive adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis in a 19-month period. Patients were excluded if no positive oral contrast solution (500 mL each of water and polyethylene glycol and 30 mL diatrizoate) was given or if the appendix was not visible or absent. After exclusion, images of 519 patients (mean age ± SD, 37.4 ± 16.0 years; 335 women, 184 men) were reviewed for cecal contrast opacification and appendiceal filling. Imaging findings were recorded as positive or negative for acute appendicitis using all available clinical and pathologic data as a reference standard. A control series of CT colonography (CTC) screening examinations (overnight preparation with universal cecal opacification) in 2552 adults without symptoms of appendicitis was also reviewed. Cecal opacification was confirmed in 313/519 (60.3%) patients, with no difference between those considered to be positive (68/107, 63.6%) or negative (245/412, 59.5%) for appendicitis ( = 0.506). When positive oral contrast solution reached the cecum, appendiceal filling was seen in none of the 68 (0%) with appendicitis and in 205 of the 245 (83.7%) without appendicitis ( < 0.0001). Among CTC control subjects, appendiceal filling was similar to the cohort considered to be without appendicitis (2240/2552 [87.8%], = 0.070). In MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis, luminal filling of the noninflamed appendix exceeds 80% when positive oral contrast solution reaches the cecum, indicating results similar to screening CTC. The appendix did not fill in proven acute appendicitis, indicating appendiceal filling may allow exclusion of appendicitis with high certainty. These results suggest positive oral contrast solution may augment diagnostic accuracy and confidence in cases of suspected acute appendicitis.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在 MDCT 中对疑似急性阑尾炎患者进行口服阳性对比剂充盈率。在 19 个月期间,我们对 684 例连续疑似急性阑尾炎的成年患者进行了 MDCT 回顾性分析。如果未给予阳性口服对比剂(水和聚乙二醇各 500ml 和 30ml 泛影葡胺),或者阑尾不可见或缺失,则将患者排除在外。排除后,对 519 例患者(平均年龄 ± SD,37.4 ± 16.0 岁;女性 335 例,男性 184 例)的盲肠对比显影和阑尾充盈情况进行了回顾性分析。使用所有可用的临床和病理数据作为参考标准,将影像学结果记录为急性阑尾炎阳性或阴性。还回顾了 2552 例无阑尾炎症状的成年人的 CT 结肠成像(CTC)筛查检查(隔夜准备,盲肠显影)的对照系列。在 519 例患者中,313 例(60.3%)盲肠显影,在考虑为阳性(107 例中的 68 例,63.6%)或阴性(412 例中的 245 例,59.5%)的阑尾炎患者中,盲肠显影无差异( = 0.506)。当阳性口服对比剂到达盲肠时,在 68 例(0%)阑尾炎患者中未见阑尾充盈,在 245 例(83.7%)无阑尾炎患者中见阑尾充盈(<0.0001)。在 CTC 对照患者中,阑尾充盈与被认为无阑尾炎的队列相似(2240/2552[87.8%], = 0.070)。在疑似急性阑尾炎的 MDCT 中,当阳性口服对比剂到达盲肠时,非炎症性阑尾的腔内充盈超过 80%,表明结果与筛查 CTC 相似。在已证实的急性阑尾炎中,阑尾未充盈,表明阑尾充盈可以高度确定排除阑尾炎。这些结果表明,阳性口服对比剂可能会提高疑似急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性和信心。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验