Ishimaru Tetsuya, Deie Kyoichi, Kawashima Hiroshi, Sumida Wataru, Kakihara Tomo, Katoh Reiko, Aoyama Tomohiro, Hayashi Kentaro
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Oct;29(10):1352-1356. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0087. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) versus conventional two-dimensional (2D) vision in pediatric laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Medical records and procedure videos of patients 18 years old or younger who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at a single institution between January 2015 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The total pneumoperitoneum and wrapping times were measured. The number of errors during the first stitch of the wrapping was counted. Three-dimensional laparoscopy was introduced in January 2017, and data were compared between the previous 2D and current 3D groups. A questionnaire was provided to each surgeon who performed the 3D procedure. Laparoscopic fundoplication was performed under 2D vision in 32 patients and under 3D vision in 19 patients. Mean ages and weights at surgery were similar between the groups. There was no significant differences in pneumoperitoneum and wrapping times between the two groups. Significantly more errors were counted in the 2D versus 3D procedure, but all patients recovered without any complications related to intraoperative errors. On the questionnaires, all 8 surgeons desired a decreased scope diameter and multidirectional visual axis. Four surgeons (50%) experienced eyestrain and 1 experienced double vision. This study showed no reduction in surgical time with 3D versus 2D scope use. Three-dimensional vision decreased the technical errors in creating the wrap, but its clinical merit remains unclear. Decreasing the scope diameter and adding multidirectional vision capabilities are needed for the 3D scope to gain more widespread approval and use in pediatric surgery.
本研究旨在评估三维(3D)视觉与传统二维(2D)视觉在小儿腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术中的实用性。回顾性分析了2015年1月至2018年8月在单一机构接受腹腔镜尼氏胃底折叠术的18岁及以下患者的病历和手术视频。测量了总的气腹时间和包裹时间。统计包裹第一针时的错误数量。2017年1月引入了三维腹腔镜检查,并对之前的二维组和当前的三维组的数据进行了比较。向每位进行三维手术的外科医生提供了一份问卷。32例患者在二维视觉下进行腹腔镜胃底折叠术,19例患者在三维视觉下进行。两组手术时的平均年龄和体重相似。两组之间的气腹时间和包裹时间没有显著差异。二维手术中的错误数量明显多于三维手术,但所有患者均康复,未出现与术中错误相关的任何并发症。在问卷中,所有8位外科医生都希望缩小镜身直径并增加多向视轴。4位外科医生(50%)出现眼疲劳,1位出现复视。本研究表明,与使用二维镜相比,使用三维镜并没有缩短手术时间。三维视觉减少了包裹制作过程中的技术错误,但其临床优势仍不明确。三维镜需要缩小镜身直径并增加多向视觉功能,才能在小儿外科手术中获得更广泛的认可和应用。