• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床环境中一线工作人员使用围聚讨论:一项范围综述方案

Use of huddles among frontline staff in clinical settings: a scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Pimentel Camilla B, Hartmann Christine W, Okyere Daniel, Carnes Sarah L, Loup Julia R, Vallejo-Luces Tatiana M, Sloup Sharon N, Snow A Lynn

机构信息

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, USA.

New England Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Bedford, USA.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jan;18(1):146-153. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00026.

DOI:10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00026
PMID:31483341
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the current evidence on huddles in healthcare settings involving frontline staff.

INTRODUCTION

Team-based models are gaining prominence as the preferred method for delivering coordinated, cost-effective, high-quality health care. Huddles are a powerful method for building relationships among frontline staff members. Currently, no reviews have described huddles used among frontline staff in clinical settings. There is therefore a need to identify gaps in the literature on evidence informing this practice for a greater understanding of the resources available for frontline staff to implement huddles.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This scoping review will consider qualitative studies, experimental and quasi-experimental studies, analytic observational studies and descriptive cross-sectional studies that explore the use of frontline staff huddles to improve quality of care in a clinical setting.

METHODS

An initial limited search of PubMed and CINAHL Plus with Full Text will be performed, followed by analysis of the title, abstract and MeSH used to describe the article. Second, searches of PubMed, EBSCOhost and ProQuest will be conducted, followed by searches in reference lists of all articles that meet the inclusion criteria. Studies published in English from inception to the present will be considered. Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by at least two reviewers. Data will be extracted and presented in tabular form and a narrative summary that align with the review's objective.

摘要

目的

本范围综述旨在概述当前关于医疗机构中一线工作人员开展碰头会的证据。

引言

基于团队的模式正日益成为提供协调、具成本效益且高质量医疗服务的首选方法。碰头会是在一线工作人员之间建立关系的有力方法。目前,尚无综述描述临床环境中一线工作人员所采用的碰头会情况。因此,有必要找出文献中有关为这一做法提供依据的证据方面的差距,以便更深入了解可供一线工作人员实施碰头会的资源。

纳入标准

本范围综述将纳入定性研究、实验性和准实验性研究、分析性观察研究以及描述性横断面研究,这些研究探讨了一线工作人员通过碰头会来改善临床环境中的医疗服务质量。

方法

首先将对PubMed和CINAHL Plus全文数据库进行初步有限检索,随后分析用于描述文章的标题、摘要和医学主题词。其次,将对PubMed、EBSCOhost和ProQuest进行检索,接着在所有符合纳入标准的文章的参考文献列表中进行检索。将考虑从创刊至今以英文发表的研究。检索到的论文将由至少两名评审员筛选是否纳入。将提取数据并以表格形式呈现,并给出与综述目标相符的叙述性总结。

相似文献

1
Use of huddles among frontline staff in clinical settings: a scoping review protocol.临床环境中一线工作人员使用围聚讨论:一项范围综述方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jan;18(1):146-153. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00026.
2
Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review.临床护理前沿的团队协作及其效果:综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2772-2783. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06632-9. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Patient navigation programs for people with dementia, their caregivers, and members of the care team: a scoping review.痴呆患者及其照护者和照护团队成员的患者导航计划:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Feb 1;21(2):281-325. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00024.
8
Dietitian-led clinics in primary care: a scoping review protocol.初级保健中由营养师主导的诊所:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Dec;17(12):2525-2531. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00025.
9
Facilitators and barriers of relatives' involvement in nursing care decisions and self-care of patients with acquired brain injury or malignant brain tumour: A scoping review protocol.亲属参与颅脑损伤或恶性脑肿瘤患者护理决策和自我护理的促进因素和障碍:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0273151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273151. eCollection 2022.
10
Identifying occupational health hazards among healthcare providers and ancillary staff in Ghana: a scoping review protocol.识别加纳医护人员和辅助人员的职业健康危害:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 4;12(1):e058048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058048.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging National Nursing Home Huddles for Rapid COVID-19 Response.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;6(2):62. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6020062.
2
Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review.临床护理前沿的团队协作及其效果:综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2772-2783. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06632-9. Epub 2021 Feb 8.