• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇女在天主教和非天主教医院接受生殖保健服务的期望。

Women's Expectation of Receiving Reproductive Health Care at Catholic and Non-Catholic Hospitals.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Sep;51(3):135-142. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12118. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1363/psrh.12118
PMID:31483947
Abstract

CONTEXT

Catholic hospitals operate under directives that prohibit the provision of contraceptives, sterilization and abortion. Little research has examined women's awareness of these institutions' policies, which affects their ability to make informed decisions about where to seek care.

METHODS

In 2016, some 1,430 women aged 18-45 were recruited from a U.S. probability-based research panel for a survey about hospital care. Respondents were randomized to a hypothetical Catholic or nonreligious hospital group and asked about their expectations for receiving nine specific reproductive services. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between participants' characteristics and their correctly identifying a hospital as Catholic, as well as between characteristics and expecting that birth control pills, tubal ligation or abortion for serious fetal indications would be provided there.

RESULTS

Women randomized to the Catholic hospital group were less likely than those randomized to the nonreligious group to expect provision of birth control pills (77% vs. 86%), tubal ligation (70% vs. 78%) or abortion for serious fetal indications (42% vs. 54%). Income level was associated with correctly identifying the Catholic hospital: Compared with individuals with the lowest income, those in three of the four other income groups were more likely to identify the hospital as Catholic (odds ratios, 1.9-2.2). In comparison with women who misidentified the Catholic hospital, those who identified it as Catholic had lower expectations that the hospital would provide birth control pills (0.3), tubal ligation (0.5) or abortion (0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Many women do not realize the breadth of restrictions on reproductive health care at Catholic hospitals. Without institutional transparency, patient autonomy and health outcomes may be compromised.

摘要

背景

天主教医院的运营受到指令的限制,禁止提供避孕药、绝育和堕胎服务。很少有研究调查过女性对这些机构政策的认识,而这影响了她们做出有关在哪里寻求护理的知情决策的能力。

方法

2016 年,从美国基于概率的研究小组中招募了约 1430 名年龄在 18-45 岁之间的女性,对她们进行了一项关于医院护理的调查。受访者被随机分配到假设的天主教或非宗教医院组,并被问及他们对接受九种特定生殖服务的期望。使用多变量逻辑回归分析评估了参与者的特征与正确识别医院为天主教医院之间的关联,以及特征与期望在那里提供避孕药、输卵管结扎或因严重胎儿指征进行堕胎之间的关联。

结果

与随机分配到非宗教组的女性相比,随机分配到天主教医院组的女性不太可能期望提供避孕药(77%比 86%)、输卵管结扎(70%比 78%)或因严重胎儿指征进行堕胎(42%比 54%)。收入水平与正确识别天主教医院有关:与收入最低的个体相比,其他四个收入组中的三个群体更有可能将医院识别为天主教医院(比值比,1.9-2.2)。与错误识别天主教医院的女性相比,正确识别天主教医院的女性对医院提供避孕药(0.3)、输卵管结扎(0.5)或堕胎(0.2)的期望较低。

结论

许多女性没有意识到天主教医院在生殖保健方面的广泛限制。如果没有机构透明度,患者自主权和健康结果可能会受到影响。

相似文献

1
Women's Expectation of Receiving Reproductive Health Care at Catholic and Non-Catholic Hospitals.妇女在天主教和非天主教医院接受生殖保健服务的期望。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Sep;51(3):135-142. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12118. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
Expectations about availability of contraception and abortion at a hypothetical Catholic hospital: Rural-urban disparities among Wisconsin women.对假设的天主教医院提供避孕和堕胎服务的期望:威斯康星州城乡女性之间的差异。
Contraception. 2021 Nov;104(5):506-511. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
Are women aware of religious restrictions on reproductive health at Catholic hospitals? A survey of women's expectations and preferences for family planning care.天主教医院的女性是否知晓宗教对生殖健康的限制?一项关于女性对计划生育护理的期望和偏好的调查。
Contraception. 2014 Oct;90(4):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.06.035. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
4
Religious hospital policies on reproductive care: what do patients want to know?宗教医院的生殖护理政策:患者想知道什么?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):251.e1-251.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.595. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
5
What Are Women Told When Requesting Family Planning Services at Clinics Associated with Catholic Hospitals? A Mystery Caller Study.当女性在与天主教医院相关的诊所寻求计划生育服务时,她们会被告知什么?神秘来电者研究。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Dec;49(4):207-212. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12040. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
6
Do women know whether their hospital is Catholic? Results from a national survey.女性是否知道她们所在的医院是否为天主教医院?一项全国性调查的结果。
Contraception. 2018 Dec;98(6):498-503. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 29.
7
Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns' experiences.天主教医院中的输卵管结扎术:一项关于妇产科医生经历的定性研究。
Contraception. 2014 Oct;90(4):422-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 4.
8
Restrictions on Reproductive Care at Catholic Hospitals: A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences and Perspectives.天主教医院生殖护理限制:对患者体验和观点的定性研究。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Oct-Dec;11(4):257-267. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1817173. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
9
"My Hands Are Tied": Abortion Restrictions and Providers' Experiences in Religious and Nonreligious Health Care Systems.“束手无策”:宗教和非宗教医疗保健系统中的堕胎限制和提供者的经历。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;52(2):107-115. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12148. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
Referrals for Services Prohibited In Catholic Health Care Facilities.禁止向天主教医疗保健机构转介服务。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Sep;48(3):111-7. doi: 10.1363/48e10216. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Institutional Responses to Voluntary Assisted Dying: An Empirical Study in Victoria and Western Australia.机构对自愿协助死亡的应对措施:维多利亚州和西澳大利亚州的实证研究
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10418-z.
2
The 'Institutional Lottery': Institutional variation in the processes involved in accessing late abortion in Victoria, Australia.“机构抽签”:澳大利亚维多利亚州晚期堕胎获取过程中的机构差异
Womens Stud Int Forum. 2023 Nov-Dec;101:102822. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102822.
3
Institutional objection to abortion: A mixed-methods narrative review.
机构性反对堕胎:混合方法叙事性综述。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231152373. doi: 10.1177/17455057231152373.
4
Doctors' experiences providing sexual and reproductive health care at Catholic Hospitals in the conflict-affected North-West region of Cameroon: a qualitative study.在冲突影响的喀麦隆西北部地区的天主教医院中,医生提供性健康和生殖健康护理的经验:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 May 28;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01430-w.
5
Beyond : Employer's responsibilities and opportunities to improve network access to reproductive healthcare for employees.超越:雇主在改善员工获得生殖健康护理的网络方面的责任与机遇。
Contracept X. 2022 May 7;4:100078. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100078. eCollection 2022.
6
Delivery at Catholic hospitals and postpartum contraception use, five US states, 2015-2018.2015-2018 年,美国五个州天主教医院的分娩情况与产后避孕措施使用情况。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Mar;54(1):5-11. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12186. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
7
Reproductive healthcare denials among a privately insured population.私人保险人群中生殖保健服务被拒的情况。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Jun 24;23:101450. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101450. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
Patient Views on Religious Institutional Health Care.患者对宗教机构医疗保健的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917008. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17008.