Shokouhinejad Noushin, Razmi Hassan, Farbod Maryam, Alikhasi Marzieh, Camilleri Josette
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Restor Dent Endod. 2019 Jul 16;44(3):e25. doi: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e25. eCollection 2019 Aug.
The aim of this study was to evaluate discoloration of teeth undergoing regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) using blood clot or platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as the scaffolds and different calcium silicate-based materials as the intracanal coronal barriers in an model.
Forty-eight bovine incisors were prepared and disinfected using 1 mg/mL double antibiotic paste (DAP). The specimens were then randomly divided into 2 groups ( = 24) according to the scaffolds (blood or PRF). After placement of scaffolds each group was divided into 2 subgroups ( = 12) according to the intracanal coronal barriers (ProRoot MTA or Biodentine). The pulp chamber walls were sealed with dentin bonding agent before placement of DAP and before placement of scaffolds. The color changes (∆E) were measured at different steps. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance.
Coronal discoloration induced by DAP was not clinically perceptible (ΔE ≤ 3.3). Regarding the type of the scaffold, coronal discoloration was significantly higher in blood groups compared with PRF groups at the end of REP and after 1 month ( < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between PRF and blood clot after 6 months ( > 0.05). Considering the type of intracanal coronal barrier, no significant difference existed between ProRoot MTA and Biodentine ( > 0.05).
With sealing the dentinal tubules of pulp chamber with a dentin bonding agent and application of DAP as an intracanal medicament, coronal color change of the teeth following the use of PRF and blood sealed with either ProRoot MTA or Biodentine was not different at 6-month follow-up.
本研究旨在评估在一个模型中,使用血凝块或富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)作为支架,以及不同的硅酸钙基材料作为根管内冠方屏障,进行牙髓再生治疗(REP)的牙齿的变色情况。
制备48颗牛切牙,并用1mg/mL双抗生素糊剂(DAP)进行消毒。然后根据支架类型(血凝块或PRF)将标本随机分为2组(每组n = 24)。放置支架后,根据根管内冠方屏障(ProRoot MTA或Biodentine)将每组再分为2个亚组(每组n = 12)。在放置DAP和支架之前,用牙本质粘结剂封闭髓腔壁。在不同步骤测量颜色变化(∆E)。数据采用双向方差分析进行分析。
DAP引起的冠部变色在临床上无法察觉(∆E≤3.3)。关于支架类型,在牙髓再生治疗结束时和1个月后,血凝块组的冠部变色明显高于PRF组(P < 0.05)。然而,6个月后PRF组和血凝块组之间没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。考虑到根管内冠方屏障的类型,ProRoot MTA和Biodentine之间没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。
使用牙本质粘结剂封闭髓腔的牙本质小管,并应用DAP作为根管内药物,在6个月的随访中,使用ProRoot MTA或Biodentine封闭的PRF和血凝块治疗后牙齿的冠部颜色变化没有差异。