Damsma Atser, Taatgen Niels, de Jong Ritske, van Rijn Hedderik
Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Bernoulli Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):1136-1149. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01851-z.
Action and perception are optimized by exploiting temporal regularities, and it has been suggested that the attentional system prioritizes information that contains some form of structure. Indeed, Zhao, Al-Aidroos, and Turk-Browne (Psychological Science, 24(5), 667-677, 2013) found that attention was biased towards the location and low-level visual features of shapes that appeared with a regular order but were irrelevant for the main search task. Here, we investigate whether this bias also holds for irrelevant metrical temporal regularities. In six experiments, participants were asked to perform search tasks. In Experiments 1a-d, sequences of squares, each presented at one of four locations, appeared in between the search trials. Crucially, in one location, the square appeared with a regular rhythm, whereas the timing in the other locations was random. In Experiments 2a and 2b, a sequence of centrally presented colored circles was shown in between the search trials, of which one specific color appeared regularly. We expected that, if attention is automatically biased towards these temporal regularities, reaction times would be faster if the target matches the location (Experiments 1a-d) or color (Experiments 2a-b) of the regular stimulus. However, no reaction time benefit was observed for these targets, suggesting that there was no attentional bias towards the regularity. In addition, we found no evidence for attentional entrainment to the rhythmic stimulus. These results suggest that people do not use implicit rhythmic temporal regularities to guide their attention in the same way as they use order regularities.
通过利用时间规律可优化行动与感知,并且有人提出注意力系统会优先处理包含某种形式结构的信息。的确,赵、阿勒-艾德鲁斯和特克-布朗(《心理科学》,24(5),667 - 677,2013年)发现,注意力会偏向以规则顺序出现但与主要搜索任务无关的形状的位置和低级视觉特征。在此,我们探究这种偏向是否也适用于不相关的韵律时间规律。在六个实验中,要求参与者执行搜索任务。在实验1a - d中,正方形序列(每个正方形呈现在四个位置之一)出现在搜索试验之间。关键在于,在一个位置,正方形以规则节奏出现,而其他位置的时间是随机的。在实验2a和2b中,在搜索试验之间展示了一系列中央呈现的彩色圆圈,其中一种特定颜色有规律地出现。我们预期,如果注意力自动偏向这些时间规律,那么当目标与规则刺激的位置(实验1a - d)或颜色(实验2a - b)匹配时,反应时会更快。然而,对于这些目标并未观察到反应时的优势,这表明不存在对规律的注意力偏向。此外,我们没有发现注意力被韵律刺激带动的证据。这些结果表明,人们不会像利用顺序规律那样,使用隐含的韵律时间规律来引导他们的注意力。