• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

统计学习和自上而下注意力的独立作用。

Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.

作者信息

Gao Ya, Theeuwes Jan

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Institute Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (iBBA), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Nov;82(8):3895-3906. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02115-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-020-02115-x
PMID:32909086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7593392/
Abstract

It is well known that spatial attention can be directed in a top-down way to task-relevant locations in space. In addition, through visual statistical learning (VSL), attention can be biased towards relevant (target) locations and away from irrelevant (distractor) locations. The present study investigates the interaction between the explicit task-relevant, top-down attention and the lingering attentional biases due to VSL. We wanted to determine the contribution of each of these two processes to attentional selection. In the current study, participants performed a search task while keeping a location in spatial working memory. In Experiment 1, the target appeared more often in one location, and appeared less often in other location. In Experiment 2, a color singleton distractor was presented more often in location than in all other locations. The results show that when the search target matched the location that was kept in working memory, participants were much faster at responding to the search target than when it did not match, signifying top-down attentional selection. Independent of this top-down effect, we found a clear effect of VSL as responses were even faster when target (Experiment 1) or the distractor (Experiment 2) was presented at a more likely location in visual field. We conclude that attentional selection is driven by implicit biases due to statistical learning and by explicit top-down processing, each process individually and independently modulating the neural activity within the spatial priority map.

摘要

众所周知,空间注意力可以通过自上而下的方式指向空间中与任务相关的位置。此外,通过视觉统计学习(VSL),注意力可以偏向相关(目标)位置,并远离不相关(干扰)位置。本研究调查了明确的与任务相关的自上而下注意力与VSL导致的持续注意力偏差之间的相互作用。我们想确定这两个过程对注意力选择的各自贡献。在当前研究中,参与者在保持空间工作记忆中的一个位置时执行搜索任务。在实验1中,目标在一个位置出现的频率更高,而在其他位置出现的频率更低。在实验2中,一个颜色独特的干扰项在一个位置出现的频率比在所有其他位置更高。结果表明,当搜索目标与工作记忆中保持的位置匹配时,参与者对搜索目标的反应比不匹配时快得多,这表明自上而下的注意力选择。与这种自上而下的效应无关,我们发现了VSL的明显效应,因为当目标(实验1)或干扰项(实验2)出现在视野中更可能的位置时,反应甚至更快。我们得出结论,注意力选择是由统计学习导致的隐性偏差和明确的自上而下处理驱动的,每个过程单独且独立地调节空间优先级地图内的神经活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2160/7593392/9c67ec1b1335/13414_2020_2115_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2160/7593392/099e11907c3d/13414_2020_2115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2160/7593392/03276e6908ad/13414_2020_2115_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2160/7593392/546097826f35/13414_2020_2115_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2160/7593392/9c67ec1b1335/13414_2020_2115_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2160/7593392/099e11907c3d/13414_2020_2115_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2160/7593392/03276e6908ad/13414_2020_2115_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2160/7593392/546097826f35/13414_2020_2115_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2160/7593392/9c67ec1b1335/13414_2020_2115_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention.统计学习和自上而下注意力的独立作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Nov;82(8):3895-3906. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02115-x.
2
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.统计规律独立于搜索策略调节注意捕获。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1763-1774. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1562-3.
3
Statistical learning in the absence of explicit top-down attention.在缺乏明确自上而下注意力的情况下的统计学习。
Cortex. 2020 Oct;131:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
4
How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.如何抑制干扰物位置?统计学习与主动的自上而下抑制
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 May;80(4):860-870. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1493-z.
5
Implicit attentional biases in a changing environment.变化环境中的内隐注意偏差。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 May;206:103064. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103064. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
Statistical regularities bias overt attention.统计规律会使外显注意力产生偏差。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Aug;81(6):1813-1821. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01708-5.
7
Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load.学习抑制干扰项不受工作记忆负荷的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):96-104. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01679-6.
8
Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.无关特征的自上而下的非自主控制:视觉工作记忆以基于对象的方式影响注意力。
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.视觉检测任务中由于统计规律导致的空间抑制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Feb;84(2):450-458. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02330-0. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
10
No reliable effect of task-irrelevant cross-modal statistical regularities on distractor suppression.与任务无关的跨模态统计规律对干扰抑制没有可靠影响。
Cortex. 2023 Apr;161:77-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating memory episodes in location probability learning: Can altering response features reset spatial bias?探究位置概率学习中的记忆片段:改变反应特征能否重置空间偏差?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jul;87(5):1518-1529. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03106-6. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Expectations don't protect us from emotional distractions.期望并不能使我们免受情绪干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03085-8.
3
The effects of visual distractors on serial dependence.视觉干扰物对序列依赖性的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load.学习抑制干扰项不受工作记忆负荷的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):96-104. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01679-6.
2
Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional.视觉选择:通常快速且自动;很少缓慢且出于意志。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):29. doi: 10.5334/joc.13.
3
Comment on Theeuwes's Characterization of Visual Selection.评特乌韦斯对视觉选择的刻画。
J Vis. 2023 Oct 4;23(12):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.12.1.
4
Pinging the brain to reveal the hidden attentional priority map using encephalography.利用脑电图技术对大脑进行探测,揭示隐藏的注意力优先图。
Nat Commun. 2023 Aug 7;14(1):4749. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40405-8.
5
Integrated effects of top-down attention and statistical learning during visual search: An EEG study.自上而下的注意力和视觉搜索中统计学习的综合影响:一项 EEG 研究。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1819-1833. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02728-y. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Attentional suppression is in place before display onset.注意抑制发生在显示开始之前。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1012-1020. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02704-6. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
7
Top-down knowledge surpasses selection history in influencing attentional guidance.自上而下的知识胜过选择历史,影响注意力引导。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):985-1011. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02648-3. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
8
Spatial enhancement due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.由于统计学习而产生的空间增强作用跟踪估计的空间概率。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 May;84(4):1077-1086. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02489-0. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
9
The influence of reward history on goal-directed visual search.奖励历史对目标导向视觉搜索的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Feb;84(2):325-331. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02435-6. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
10
Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.解决注意力捕获争论的进展。
Vis cogn. 2021;29(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):26. doi: 10.5334/joc.29.
4
The Risks of Downplaying Top-Down Control.淡化自上而下控制的风险。
J Cogn. 2018 May 14;1(1):23. doi: 10.5334/joc.26.
5
Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search.视觉搜索中统计规律诱发的预期分心物抑制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Oct;31(10):1535-1548. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01433. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.由统计规律导致的空间抑制是由干扰项抑制驱动的,而非目标激活。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1405-1414. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01704-9.
7
Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection.目标驱动、刺激驱动和历史驱动的选择。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.024. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
8
"Top-down" Does Not Mean "Voluntary".“自上而下”并不意味着“自愿”。
J Cogn. 2018;1(1). doi: 10.5334/joc.28. Epub 2018 May 14.
9
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.统计规律独立于搜索策略调节注意捕获。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1763-1774. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1562-3.
10
How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.如何抑制干扰物位置?统计学习与主动的自上而下抑制
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 May;80(4):860-870. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1493-z.