Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Human Anatomy Resource Centre, Faculty of Health and Life Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Laryngoscope. 2020 Aug;130(8):1857-1863. doi: 10.1002/lary.28259. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
To determine whether adjunctive surgical techniques could improve access of instruments provided by the endoscopic prelacrimal recess approach to the anatomical boundaries of the maxillary sinus, and pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossa.
Ten fresh-frozen adult cadaver heads were utilized. The anatomical areas of interest were fixed, bony boundaries of the maxillary sinus, infratemporal fossa, and pterygopalatine fossa: alveolar recess (AR), zygomatic recess (ZR), perpendicular plate of the palatine bone (PB), ascending ramus of mandible (RM), floor of the orbit medial and lateral to infraorbital nerve (M-ION and L-ION, respectively). Access to the areas were compared using standard sinus surgery instruments (straight and 45° forceps) introduced via the prelacrimal recess approach, trans-septal window and canine fossa puncture.
The prelacrimal recess approach successfully provided access to the PB and M-ION in >90% of dissections when using both the straight and 45° forceps. With the straight forceps, the ability to successfully access to the AR and ZR was the lowest at 50% and 35% respectively, although improving to 75% and 60% respectively with the 45° forceps. Access to the AR, ZR, and L-ION improved significantly when the 45° forceps was introduced through the trans-septal window. Frequency of access to the RM when either instruments when introduced through the canine fossa puncture was no greater than 60% of the dissections.
The addition of a small trans-septal window for instruments significantly improved access of the prelacrimal recess approach especially to the orbital floor, lateral margins of the maxillary sinus, and retromaxillary space.
4 Laryngoscope, 130: 1857-1863, 2020.
确定辅助手术技术是否可以改善经内窥镜前泪囊窝入路提供的器械进入上颌窦、翼腭窝和颞下窝的解剖边界的能力。
使用 10 个新鲜冷冻的成人头颅标本。固定感兴趣的解剖区域,包括上颌窦、颞下窝和翼腭窝的骨性边界:牙槽窝(AR)、颧骨窝(ZR)、腭骨垂直板(PB)、下颌升支(RM)、眶内侧和眶下神经(分别为 M-ION 和 L-ION)的眶底。通过前泪囊窝入路、鼻中隔窗和犬齿窝穿刺,使用标准鼻窦手术器械(直钳和 45° 钳)比较进入这些区域的情况。
在前泪囊窝入路中,使用直钳和 45° 钳时,前泪囊窝入路成功进入 PB 和 M-ION 的比例>90%。使用直钳时,进入 AR 和 ZR 的成功率最低,分别为 50%和 35%,但使用 45° 钳时,成功率分别提高到 75%和 60%。当 45° 钳通过鼻中隔窗引入时,进入 AR、ZR 和 L-ION 的能力显著改善。当器械通过犬齿窝穿刺引入时,进入 RM 的频率无论使用哪种器械都不超过 60%的标本。
增加一个小的鼻中隔窗用于器械可以显著改善前泪囊窝入路的进入能力,特别是对于眶底、上颌窦外侧缘和后上颌窦空间。
4 级喉镜,130:1857-1863,2020 年。