• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

该领域最有影响力的出版物是否存在抄袭现象?

Is there plagiarism in the most influential publications in the field of andrology?

机构信息

American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Medical Bioscience, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.

出版信息

Andrologia. 2019 Nov;51(10):e13405. doi: 10.1111/and.13405. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1111/and.13405
PMID:31489696
Abstract

Plagiarism is a common form of academic misconduct that extensively jeopardises the quality of scientific publication. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent of plagiarism in the most influential andrology articles. A total of 77 highly cited andrology articles were analysed for their similarity index using iThenticate and Turnitin. The articles were categorised based on the year (before and on/after 2000) and type of publication (review and research articles), and the similarity indices were compared. Furthermore, the analysed articles were categorised based on the level of similarity using an arbitrary similarity index range (low: ≤10, moderate: 11-20, high: 21-50 and very high: >50) and average incidence rate (%) was determined. Our analysis revealed a higher percentage of the similarity indices for reviews than research articles. We noticed a higher similarity index for articles published on/after 2000 than those published before. The majority of the influential articles in the field of andrology showed a low similarity index, while some articles exhibited moderate to high levels of similarity. These findings support the need for the development of similarity index guidelines as a major pre-requisite for establishing a more transparent and efficient system to address plagiarism in scientific publications.

摘要

剽窃是一种常见的学术不端行为,广泛危及科学出版物的质量。本研究旨在确定最有影响力的男科文献中的剽窃程度。使用 iThenticate 和 Turnitin 分析了 77 篇高引用的男科文章,以确定其相似指数。根据发表年份(2000 年之前和 2000 年之后)和出版物类型(综述和研究文章)对文章进行分类,并比较相似指数。此外,根据任意相似指数范围(低:≤10、中:11-20、高:21-50 和非常高:>50)对分析文章进行分类,并确定平均发生率(%)。我们的分析显示,综述文章的相似指数百分比高于研究文章。我们注意到,2000 年以后发表的文章的相似指数高于 2000 年之前发表的文章。该领域有影响力的大多数男科文章的相似指数较低,而一些文章的相似指数则处于中等至高的水平。这些发现支持制定相似指数指南的必要性,这是建立一个更透明和有效的系统来解决科学出版物中的剽窃问题的主要前提。

相似文献

1
Is there plagiarism in the most influential publications in the field of andrology?该领域最有影响力的出版物是否存在抄袭现象?
Andrologia. 2019 Nov;51(10):e13405. doi: 10.1111/and.13405. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
2
Plagiarism in Predatory Publications: A Comparative Study of Three Nursing Journals.掠夺性期刊中的抄袭行为:三个护理期刊的比较研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):356-363. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12475. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
3
Similarity Analysis of Korean Medical Literature and Its Association with Efforts to Improve Research and Publication Ethics.韩医学文献的相似性分析及其与改善研究和出版伦理努力的关联
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Jun;32(6):887-892. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.6.887.
4
Plagiarism in the most influential publication in andrology and similarity check.
Andrologia. 2020 Mar;52(2):e13476. doi: 10.1111/and.13476. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
What is the rate of text generated by artificial intelligence over a year of publication in Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research? Analysis of 425 articles before versus after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022.在《矫形外科与创伤学:手术与研究》杂志上发表的人工智能文本在一年时间内的生成率是多少?分析 2022 年 11 月 ChatGPT 发布前后的 425 篇文章。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Dec;109(8):103694. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103694. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
6
Turnitin: Is it a text matching or plagiarism detection tool?Turnitin:它是一个文本匹配工具还是抄袭检测工具?
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S48-S51. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_772_18.
7
Similarity Index Analysis of the Manuscript: A Viewpoint.稿件的相似度指数分析:一种观点
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):1125.
8
[Citation analysis of National Journal of Andrology and Asian Journal of Andrology].《中华男科学杂志》与《亚洲男科学杂志》的引文分析
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2006 Jan;12(1):86-8, 92.
9
Retracted Publications in Orthopaedics: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Trends.骨科领域的撤稿论文:发生率、特征及趋势
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 3;99(9):e44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01116.
10
Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study.发表不当行为和抄袭撤稿:一项系统的、回顾性研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Oct;28(10):1575-83. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.728131. Epub 2012 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of COVID-19 Preprint and Peer-Reviewed Versions of Studies on Therapies for Critically Ill Patients.比较危重症患者治疗研究的 COVID-19 预印本和同行评审版本。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Nov;38(11):1060-1067. doi: 10.1177/08850666231182563. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers.抄袭检测与预防:研究人员入门指南
Reumatologia. 2021;59(3):132-137. doi: 10.5114/reum.2021.105974. Epub 2021 May 13.