• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎前路椎体切除融合术与多节段脊髓型颈椎病椎板成形术术后颈椎活动度的比较:基于 Coda 运动系统的三维比较。

Cervical Range of Motion after Anterior Corpectomy and Fusion versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Three-Dimensional Comparison Based on the Coda Motion System.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2019 Dec;132:e274-e282. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.178. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.178
PMID:31491573
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the change in cervical range of motion (CROM) after the 2 most widely used techniques for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM): anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) and laminoplasty.

METHODS

Patients with multilevel CSM treated in our hospital between 2014 and 2018 were divided into an ACCF group and a laminoplasty (LAMP) group according to the treatment received. Their demographic data, preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and CROM, measured using the Coda Motion system, were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were enrolled, including 29 patients in the ACCF group and 24 patients in the LAMP group. Age, sex, duration of follow-up, and preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were comparable in the 2 groups. Compared with preoperative measurements, ACCF group lost an average of 9.8%, 28.5%, 8.9%, 9.9%, 10.6%, and 7.8% of their CROM in flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion, and left and right rotation, respectively, at the latest follow-up. For the LAMP group, these average losses were 3.5%, 16.4%, 3.2%, 6.3%, 7.0%, and 5.7%, respectively. Thus, the ACCF group exhibited greater average CROM loss than the LAMP group in all directions at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ACCF and laminoplasty cause significant CROM loss in patients with multilevel CSM. The laminoplasty technique preserved more CROM than ACCF in all 6 directions after at least 1 year of follow-up. These results can be used when counseling patients undergoing surgery.

摘要

目的

比较两种最常用于多节段颈椎病(CSM)的手术方法(前路颈椎椎体切除术和融合术 [ACCF] 和椎板成形术)后颈椎活动范围(CROM)的变化。

方法

根据治疗方法,将 2014 年至 2018 年在我院治疗的多节段 CSM 患者分为 ACCF 组和椎板成形术(LAMP)组。分析比较了两组患者的人口统计学数据、术前和术后日本矫形协会(JOA)评分以及使用 Coda Motion 系统测量的 CROM。

结果

共纳入 53 例患者,其中 ACCF 组 29 例,LAMP 组 24 例。两组患者的年龄、性别、随访时间、术前和术后 JOA 评分均无差异。与术前相比,ACCF 组在末次随访时屈伸、左右侧屈、左右旋转的 CROM 分别平均丧失 9.8%、28.5%、8.9%、9.9%、10.6%和 7.8%。LAMP 组的平均损失分别为 3.5%、16.4%、3.2%、6.3%、7.0%和 5.7%。因此,与 LAMP 组相比,ACCF 组在末次随访时各方向的 CROM 平均丧失更大。

结论

ACCF 和椎板成形术都会导致多节段 CSM 患者的 CROM 显著丧失。在至少 1 年的随访后,椎板成形术在所有 6 个方向上保留的 CROM 均多于 ACCF。这些结果可用于手术患者的咨询。

相似文献

1
Cervical Range of Motion after Anterior Corpectomy and Fusion versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Three-Dimensional Comparison Based on the Coda Motion System.颈椎前路椎体切除融合术与多节段脊髓型颈椎病椎板成形术术后颈椎活动度的比较:基于 Coda 运动系统的三维比较。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Dec;132:e274-e282. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.178. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
2
Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与后路椎板成形术治疗后纵韧带骨化症所致压迫性脊髓病的Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1375-1387. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5451-6. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
3
Modified expansive laminoplasty and fusion compared with anterior cervical surgeries in treating four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.改良扩大椎板成形术与融合术治疗四级脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较:与颈椎前路手术的对比研究
J Int Med Res. 2019 Jun;47(6):2413-2423. doi: 10.1177/0300060519838919. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.前路椎体次全切除与后路椎板成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的系统评价和Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2014 Feb;23(2):362-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3043-7. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
5
[Comparison of clinical effects between anterior cervical discectomy combined with corpectomy and cervical posterior single open-door laminoplasty in treating three-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy].颈椎前路椎间盘切除联合椎体次全切除与颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗三节段脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Jan 25;31(1):37-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.01.007.
6
[Change of 3D cervical range of motion after single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion].[单节段颈椎前路椎体次全切除融合术后颈椎三维活动度的变化]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Jan 25;31(1):12-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.01.003.
7
A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Combined With Artificial Disc Replacement and Cage Fusion in Patients With Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术与人工椎间盘置换及椎间融合器融合术的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Aug 15;40(16):1277-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000957.
8
Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years.多节段脊髓型颈椎病的椎体次全切除术与椎板成形术:一项超过10年的长期随访研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 1;26(13):1443-7; discussion 1448. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107010-00011.
9
A Comparative Study of Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients With Large Anterior Compression of the Spinal Cord.前路减压融合术与后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗脊髓前方大压迫型脊髓型颈椎病的对比研究
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):E1137-E1142. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000500.
10
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Modified Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty with Posterior Muscle-Ligament Complex Preservation for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.保留颈椎后方肌肉-韧带复合体的改良单侧开门椎管扩大成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床和影像学结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):1697-1704. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003158.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Anterior Surgery Versus Posterior Surgery for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis.前路手术与后路手术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的比较:一项荟萃分析
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Aug 1;38(7):333-344. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001778. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Anterior transcorporeal approach combined with posterior translaminar approach in percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for two-segment cervical disc herniation treatment: a technical report and early follow-up.经皮内镜颈椎间盘切除术治疗两节段颈椎间盘突出症的前路经椎体入路联合后路经关节突入路:技术报告和早期随访。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 3;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04471-4.
3
Classification of three-level hybrid surgery for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease: a retrospective study of 108 patients.
三级杂交手术治疗颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的分类:108 例回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 May 14;22(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01627-7.