Odense PIPAC Center & Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark; Department of Surgery, Upper GI and HPB Section, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Odense PIPAC Center & Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloews Vej 4, 5000, Odense, Denmark; Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;46(1):155-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
Electrostatic precipitation Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC) has shown superior penetration depth and tissue uptake compared to standard PIPAC. We investigated the feasibility and objective tumor response to ePIPAC with 1 min of precipitation in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM).
Patients with PM from various abdominal cancers were included in an amendment to the ongoing prospective PIPAC-OPC2 trial. Colorectal and appendiceal PM were treated with oxaliplatin, patients with PM from other primaries were treated with a combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin. Three ePIPAC procedures were planned in each patient including repeated peritoneal biopsies for response evaluation. After emission to the peritoneal cavity, the aerosolized chemotherapeutics were precipitated for 1 min followed by immediate exsufflation and abdominal closure. Histological regression from the first to the third ePIPAC was evaluated according to the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) and compared to data from the PIPAC-OPC1 trial. Complications and toxicities were recorded according to Dindo-Clavien and CTCAE.
Sixty-five ePIPAC procedures were performed in 33 patients (median 2, range 1-6). Ten patients were eligible for response evaluation based on biopsies from the first and third ePIPAC procedure. Four patients had disease progression, four patients had regressive disease, and two patients had stable disease according to PRGS. No life threatening adverse reactions and no mortality was observed following ePIPAC.
One minute ePIPAC was feasible and safe, but the histological tumor response was insufficient compared to standard PIPAC directed therapy with 30 min passive diffusion time.
静电沉淀腹腔内加压气溶胶化疗(ePIPAC)与标准 PIPAC 相比,具有更深的穿透深度和组织摄取能力。我们研究了在有腹膜转移(PM)的患者中,使用 1 分钟沉淀时间进行 ePIPAC 的可行性和客观肿瘤反应。
在正在进行的前瞻性 PIPAC-OPC2 试验的修正案中,纳入了来自各种腹部癌症的 PM 患者。结直肠和阑尾 PM 采用奥沙利铂治疗,其他原发性 PM 患者采用顺铂和多柔比星联合治疗。每个患者计划进行 3 次 ePIPAC 程序,包括腹膜活检以评估反应。在向腹腔内发射后,将气溶胶化的化疗药物沉淀 1 分钟,然后立即排气并关闭腹部。根据腹膜消退分级评分(PRGS)评估从第一次到第三次 ePIPAC 的组织学消退,并与 PIPAC-OPC1 试验的数据进行比较。根据 Dindo-Clavien 和 CTCAE 记录并发症和毒性。
在 33 名患者中进行了 65 次 ePIPAC 手术(中位数 2 次,范围 1-6 次)。根据第一次和第三次 ePIPAC 手术的活检,有 10 名患者有资格进行反应评估。根据 PRGS,4 名患者疾病进展,4 名患者疾病消退,2 名患者疾病稳定。ePIPAC 后未观察到危及生命的不良反应和死亡。
1 分钟 ePIPAC 是可行且安全的,但与 30 分钟被动扩散时间的标准 PIPAC 定向治疗相比,组织学肿瘤反应不足。