• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分诊急诊护士的决策:焦点小组研究的偶然发现

Triage emergency nurse decision-making: Incidental findings from a focus group study.

作者信息

Reay Gudrun, Smith-MacDonald Lorraine, Then Karen L, Hall Marc, Rankin James A

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

出版信息

Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Jan;48:100791. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2019.100791. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2019.100791
PMID:31494074
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Emergency Department (ED) triage decision-making is a complex process. Triage scales are used to determine patient acuity level, however, they do not provide information on how nurses make triage decisions. This focus group study was part of a larger project to develop a psychometrically sound instrument to measure triage decision-making by nurses; the Triage Decision-Making Instrument. We report important incidental findings that emerged during the study that the participants identified as factors impeding triage decision-making.

METHODS

Three focus groups were conducted with 11 triage Registered Nurses. They commented on the instrument items and identified factors that influence triage decision-making. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three powerful inter-related themes emerged central to encumbering triage decision-making: competing systems (pre-hospital versus the ED), fluctuating patient volume resulting in 'intra-Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale' triaging, and personal capacity including experience and 'triage fatigue'.

DISCUSSION

The findings demonstrate how interrelated system factors impede nurses triage decision-making. Triage nurses require support in their role and initiatives are needed to reduce the pressure they feel in relation to resolving system issues. Larger system issues and the capacity of the individual decision-makers must be accounted for within the context of increasing effectiveness and safety of ED triage.

摘要

引言

急诊科分诊决策是一个复杂的过程。分诊量表用于确定患者的 acuity 水平,然而,它们并未提供护士如何做出分诊决策的相关信息。这项焦点小组研究是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目旨在开发一种心理测量学上合理的工具来衡量护士的分诊决策;即分诊决策工具。我们报告了研究过程中出现的重要附带发现,参与者将这些发现确定为阻碍分诊决策的因素。

方法

与 11 名分诊注册护士进行了三个焦点小组讨论。他们对工具项目发表了评论,并确定了影响分诊决策的因素。使用主题分析法对转录本进行了分析。

结果

出现了三个强大且相互关联的主题,这些主题是阻碍分诊决策的核心:相互竞争的系统(院前与急诊科)、患者数量波动导致的“加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表”分诊,以及个人能力,包括经验和“分诊疲劳”。

讨论

研究结果表明系统因素是如何相互关联从而阻碍护士的分诊决策的。分诊护士在其工作中需要得到支持,并且需要采取措施来减轻他们在解决系统问题方面所感受到的压力。在提高急诊科分诊的有效性和安全性的背景下,必须考虑更大的系统问题和个体决策者的能力。

相似文献

1
Triage emergency nurse decision-making: Incidental findings from a focus group study.分诊急诊护士的决策:焦点小组研究的偶然发现
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Jan;48:100791. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2019.100791. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Triaging the Emergency Department, Not the Patient: United States Emergency Nurses' Experience of the Triage Process.对急诊科进行分诊,而非对患者:美国急诊护士的分诊过程体验
J Emerg Nurs. 2018 May;44(3):258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
3
Explicating nurses' cardiac triage decisions.解读护士的心脏分诊决策。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):50-7. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000317474.50424.4f.
4
Momentary fitting in a fluid environment: A grounded theory of triage nurse decision making.在流动环境中的瞬间适配:分诊护士决策的扎根理论
Int Emerg Nurs. 2016 May;26:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
5
ED Triage Decision-Making With Mental Health Presentations: A "Think Aloud" Study.伴有心理健康问题的急诊分诊决策:一项“出声思考”研究
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Nov;41(6):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.04.016. Epub 2015 May 29.
6
Emergency department triage decision-making by registered nurses: An instrument development study.急诊分诊决策:注册护士的工具开发研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4725-4735. doi: 10.1111/jan.16252. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
7
Characteristics, insights, decision making, and preparation of ED triage nurses.急诊科分诊护士的特征、见解、决策及准备工作。
J Emerg Nurs. 2002 Oct;28(5):401-6. doi: 10.1067/men.2002.127513.
8
Triage decision making: educational strategies.分诊决策:教育策略
Accid Emerg Nurs. 1999 Apr;7(2):106-11. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2302(99)80031-9.
9
Evaluation of the factors affecting triage decision-making among emergency department nurses and emergency medical technicians in Iran: a study based on Benner's theory.评价伊朗急诊科护士和急救技师分诊决策的影响因素:基于本纳理论的研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 28;22(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00729-y.
10
Emergency department triage: is there a link between nurses' personal characteristics and accuracy in triage decisions?急诊科分诊:护士的个人特征与分诊决策准确性之间存在关联吗?
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Apr;14(2):83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.12.001. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of centrality bias on triage nurses in the emergency department.中心性偏差对急诊科分诊护士的影响。
SAGE Open Med. 2025 Aug 23;13:20503121251364742. doi: 10.1177/20503121251364742. eCollection 2025.
2
The application of decision tree analysis based on nursing vertical management in the allocation of obstetrics and gynecology nurses.基于护理垂直管理的决策树分析在妇产科护士配置中的应用
Afr Health Sci. 2025 Jun;25(2):241-249. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v25i2.29.
3
A foundational triage system for improving accuracy in moderate acuity level emergency classifications.
一种用于提高中度急症级别紧急情况分类准确性的基础分诊系统。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jul 31;5(1):322. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01052-w.
4
Metacognitive processes, situational factors, and clinical decision-making in nursing education: a quantitative longitudinal study.护理教育中的元认知过程、情境因素与临床决策:一项纵向定量研究
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 26;24(1):1530. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06467-y.
5
The effects of applying artificial intelligence to triage in the emergency department: A systematic review of prospective studies.人工智能在急诊科分诊中的应用效果:前瞻性研究的系统评价
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Jan;57(1):105-118. doi: 10.1111/jnu.13024. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
6
Identifying the obstacles facing emergency nurses regarding treating CTAS1 and CTAS2 in Saudi Arabia.识别沙特阿拉伯急诊护士在治疗 CTAS1 和 CTAS2 方面面临的障碍。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 18;24(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01044-4.
7
Emergency triage nurses' perceptions of caring behaviors and the safety of the patient during triage encounters: a grounded theory study.急诊分诊护士在分诊过程中对关怀行为及患者安全的认知:一项扎根理论研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 3;23(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02122-5.
8
The emergency nurse responses to triage interruptions and how these responses are perceived by patients: An observational, prospective study.紧急护士对分诊中断的反应以及患者对此的感知:一项观察性、前瞻性研究。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2023 Mar;67:101251. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2022.101251. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
9
Strategies to improve the quality of nurse triage in emergency departments: A realist review protocol.提高急诊科护士分诊质量的策略:一个真实主义综述方案。
Nurs Open. 2023 May;10(5):2770-2779. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1550. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
10
Evaluation of the factors affecting triage decision-making among emergency department nurses and emergency medical technicians in Iran: a study based on Benner's theory.评价伊朗急诊科护士和急救技师分诊决策的影响因素:基于本纳理论的研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 28;22(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00729-y.