使用CONSORT声明评估成瘾随机试验报告的完整性：一项横断面综述。
Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review.
作者信息
Vassar Matthew, Jellison Sam, Wendelbo Hannah, Wayant Cole, Gray Harrison, Bibens Michael
机构信息
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
出版信息
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e032024. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032024.
OBJECTIVES
Evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PARTICIPANTS
RCTs identified using a PubMed search of 15 addiction journals and a 5-year cross-section.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Completeness of reporting.
RESULTS
Our analysis of 394 addiction RCTs found that the mean number of CONSORT items reported was 19.2 (SD 5.2), out of a possible 31. Twelve items were reported in <50% of RCTs; similarly, 12 items were reported in >75% of RCTs. Journal endorsement of CONSORT was found to improve the number of CONSORT items reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Poor reporting quality may prohibit readers from critically appraising the methodological quality of addiction trials. We recommend journal endorsement of CONSORT since our study and those previous have shown that CONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reporting.
目的
使用《报告试验的统一标准》（CONSORT）声明评估成瘾随机对照试验（RCT）报告的完整性。
设置
不适用。
参与者
通过对15种成瘾期刊进行PubMed检索并选取5年横断面数据确定的RCT。
观察指标
报告的完整性。
结果
我们对394项成瘾RCT的分析发现，CONSORT条目的平均报告数量为19.2（标准差5.2），而可能的条目数为31条。在不到50%的RCT中报告了12个条目；同样，在超过75%的RCT中报告了12个条目。发现期刊对CONSORT的认可可提高CONSORT条目的报告数量。
结论
报告质量差可能会阻碍读者对成瘾试验的方法学质量进行批判性评估。我们建议期刊认可CONSORT，因为我们的研究和之前的研究表明，认可CONSORT可提高报告质量。
Zotero 插件