Park Jin, Kim Gab Lae, Yang Kyu Hyun
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, 150 Sung-an-ro, Kangdonggu, Seoul, 05355, South Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2019 Dec;41(12):1505-1511. doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02329-1. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
The purpose of this study is to compare the acetabular teardrop (the structure located inferomedially in the acetabulum, just superior to the obturator foramen. The medial lip is the interior, and the lateral lip is the exterior of the acetabular wall) with the inferior acetabular rim as anatomical landmarks to measure the acetabular abduction angle (AAD) using coronal CT images from different levels.
Our retrospective study included 120 pelvic CT scans from patients with non-orthopedic pathologies or stress fractures of the proximal femur. The patients included 60 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 40-66) and 60 males with a mean age of 46 years (range 38-65). Each AAD was measured using coronal plane CT slices from five levels: AAD (+ 10) (10 mm anterior to the femoral head center), AAD (+ 5) (5 mm anterior to the femoral head center), AAD (0) (through the femoral head center), AAD (- 5) (5 mm posterior to the femoral head center), and AAD (- 10) (10 mm posterior to the femoral head center). The measurements were then divided into two groups: teardrop-based AADs [AAD (+ 10), AAD (+ 5), and AAD (0)] and rim-based AADs [AAD (- 5) and AAD (- 10)].
There were no mean significant differences in AAD within the groups, whereas the difference between the groups was significant. The mean teardrop-based AAD was quite significantly different from the mean rim-based AAD due to the use of different anatomical landmarks. Teardrop-based AADs are lower than rim-based AADs, leading to measurement differences of more than 10°.
AAD measurements considering the inferior acetabular rim can be more accurate than those considering the acetabular teardrop because the inferior rim represents the nearly hemispheric acetabulum better than does the teardrop. It is recommended to differentiate between the teardrop and the inferior acetabular rim when measuring AAD to avoid confusion regarding acetabular abduction.
本研究旨在比较髋臼泪滴(位于髋臼内下侧、闭孔上方的结构。内侧缘是髋臼壁的内侧部分,外侧缘是髋臼壁的外侧部分)与髋臼下缘作为解剖标志,利用不同层面的冠状位CT图像测量髋臼外展角(AAD)。
我们的回顾性研究纳入了120例因非骨科疾病或股骨近端应力性骨折患者的骨盆CT扫描。患者包括60名女性,平均年龄48岁(范围40 - 66岁)和60名男性,平均年龄46岁(范围38 - 65岁)。每个AAD使用五个层面的冠状面CT切片进行测量:AAD(+10)(股骨头中心前方10毫米处)、AAD(+5)(股骨头中心前方5毫米处)、AAD(0)(通过股骨头中心)、AAD(-5)(股骨头中心后方5毫米处)和AAD(-)(股骨头中心后方10毫米处)。然后将测量结果分为两组:基于泪滴的AAD [AAD(+10)、AAD(+5)和AAD(0)]和基于边缘的AAD [AAD(-5)和AAD(-10)]。
组内AAD无显著平均差异,而组间差异显著。由于使用了不同的解剖标志,基于泪滴的平均AAD与基于边缘的平均AAD有相当显著的差异。基于泪滴的AAD低于基于边缘的AAD,导致测量差异超过10°。
考虑髋臼下缘的AAD测量可能比考虑髋臼泪滴的测量更准确,因为下缘比泪滴更能代表近乎半球形的髋臼。建议在测量AAD时区分泪滴和髋臼下缘,以避免髋臼外展测量的混淆。