• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

涉及动静脉血液透析通路的医疗事故案件的陪审团裁决及结果。

Jury verdicts and outcomes of malpractice cases involving arteriovenous hemodialysis access.

作者信息

Phair John, Carnevale Matthew, Wilson Eelin, Koleilat Issam

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2020 May;21(3):287-292. doi: 10.1177/1129729819872846. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1177/1129729819872846
PMID:31495258
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze malpractice cases involving hemodialysis access to prevent future litigation and improve physician education.

METHODS

Jury verdict reviews from the WESTLAW database from 1 January 2005 to 1 January 2015 were reviewed. The search terms "hemodialysis," "dialysis," "graft," "fistula," "AVG," "AVF," "arteriovenous," "catheter," "permacatheter," and "shiley" were used to compile data on the demographics of the defendant, plaintiff, allegation, complication, and verdict.

RESULTS

Sixty-six cases involving the litigation pertaining to hemodialysis catheter, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) were obtained. Of these, 55% involved catheter-based hemodialysis access, 18% involved AVF, and 27% involved AVG. The most frequent physician defendants were vascular surgeons (36%), internists (14%), nephrologists (14%), general surgeons (9%), and interventional radiologists (6%). Of the patients, 38% involved were male and the average patient age was 56.3 (standard deviation (SD) = 20.1) years. Region of injury was 50% in the neck or chest, 42% in the arm, and 8% in the groin. Injury was listed as death in 79% of cases. Of the deaths, 95% involved bleeding at some point in the chain of events. The most common claims related to the cases were failure to perform the surgery or procedure safely (44%), failure to diagnose and treat in a timely manner (30%), and negligent hemodialysis treatment (11%). The most common complications cited were hemorrhage (62%), loss of function of limb (15%), and ischemia due to steal syndrome (11%). A total of 26 cases (39%) were found for the plaintiff or settled. The median award was US$463,000 with a mean of US$985,299 (SD = US$1,314,557).

CONCLUSION

While popular opinion may indicate that steal syndrome is a commonly litigated complication, our data reveal that the most common injury litigated is death which may frequently be the result of a hemorrhagic episode. In addition to hemorrhage, the remaining most common complications included steal syndrome and loss of limb function. Therefore, steps to better prevent, diagnose and treat bleeding, nerve injury, and steal syndrome in a timely manner are critical to preventing hemodialysis-access-associated litigation.

摘要

目的

分析涉及血液透析通路的医疗事故案例,以预防未来的诉讼并改善医生教育。

方法

回顾了2005年1月1日至2015年1月1日WESTLAW数据库中的陪审团裁决。使用搜索词“血液透析”“透析”“移植物”“动静脉内瘘”“动静脉移植物”“动静脉”“导管”“长期导管”和“希利”来汇编关于被告、原告的人口统计学、指控、并发症和裁决的数据。

结果

获得了66例涉及血液透析导管、动静脉内瘘(AVF)或动静脉移植物(AVG)诉讼的案例。其中,55%涉及基于导管的血液透析通路,18%涉及AVF,27%涉及AVG。最常见的医生被告是血管外科医生(36%)、内科医生(14%)、肾病学家(14%)、普通外科医生(9%)和介入放射科医生(6%)。在患者中,38%为男性,患者平均年龄为56.3岁(标准差(SD)=20.1)。损伤部位50%在颈部或胸部,42%在手臂,8%在腹股沟。79%的案例中损伤被列为死亡。在死亡案例中,95%在事件链的某个环节涉及出血。与这些案例相关的最常见索赔是未能安全地进行手术或操作(44%)、未能及时诊断和治疗(30%)以及疏忽的血液透析治疗(11%)。最常提及的并发症是出血(62%)、肢体功能丧失(15%)和窃血综合征导致的缺血(11%)。共有26例(39%)判决原告胜诉或达成和解。赔偿中位数为46.3万美元,平均为98.5299万美元(SD = 131.4557万美元)。

结论

虽然普遍观点可能表明窃血综合征是一个经常被诉讼的并发症,但我们的数据显示,最常被诉讼的损伤是死亡,这可能经常是出血事件的结果。除了出血,其余最常见的并发症包括窃血综合征和肢体功能丧失。因此,采取措施更好地及时预防、诊断和治疗出血、神经损伤和窃血综合征对于预防与血液透析通路相关的诉讼至关重要。

相似文献

1
Jury verdicts and outcomes of malpractice cases involving arteriovenous hemodialysis access.涉及动静脉血液透析通路的医疗事故案件的陪审团裁决及结果。
J Vasc Access. 2020 May;21(3):287-292. doi: 10.1177/1129729819872846. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
2
Malpractice Litigation for Compartment Syndrome.骨筋膜室综合征的医疗事故诉讼
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;67:143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
3
Why Do Vascular Surgeons Get Sued? Analysis of Claims and Outcomes in Malpractice Litigation.血管外科医生为何会被起诉?医疗事故诉讼中的索赔及结果分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;51:25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
4
Inferior Vena Cava Filter Malpractice Litigation: Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don't.下腔静脉滤器医疗事故诉讼:做也该死,不做也该死。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;50:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.01.093. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Hemodialysis access cost comparisons among incident tunneled catheter patients.初发带隧道导管患者的血液透析通路成本比较
J Vasc Access. 2020 May;21(3):308-313. doi: 10.1177/1129729819874307. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Jury verdicts, outcomes, and tort reform features of malpractice cases involving thoracic outlet syndrome.涉及胸廓出口综合征的医疗事故案件的陪审团裁决、结果和侵权改革特征。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):962-967. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.098. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
7
Incidence and risk factors of sepsis in hemodialysis patients in the United States.美国血液透析患者中脓毒症的发生率及危险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):1016-1021.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.126. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
8
Utilization, patency, and complications associated with vascular access for hemodialysis in the United States.美国血液透析血管通路的利用、通畅性和相关并发症。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1166-1174. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.049.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of autogenous arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, and tunneled-cuffed catheter for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage kidney disease in Southern China.中国南方地区终末期肾病患者血液透析自体动静脉内瘘、动静脉移植物和隧道式带袖套导管的成本效果分析。
J Vasc Access. 2024 May;25(3):953-962. doi: 10.1177/11297298221143010. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
10
Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States.延迟诊断是肉瘤诉讼的主要原因:美国医疗事故索赔分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2239-2253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001340.

引用本文的文献

1
Accessory veins related hand ischemia: A case series.副静脉相关的手部缺血:病例系列
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jul 26;68:102593. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102593. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Medical malpractice related to dialysis and vascular access: An analysis of lawsuit judgements in South Korea.与透析和血管通路相关的医疗事故:韩国诉讼判决分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255020. eCollection 2021.