Suppr超能文献

听障者通过多通道和无通道助听器进行的时间处理和语音感知。

Temporal processing and speech perception through multi-channel and channel-free hearing aids in hearing impaired.

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing, Manipal College of Health Professionals, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2019 Dec;58(12):923-932. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1660005. Epub 2019 Sep 8.

Abstract

To compare the temporal processing skills and speech in noise perception of hearing-impaired individuals through channel free and multichannel hearing aids. A quasi-experimental study. Twenty-one participants with sensory neural hearing loss were involved in the study. They were subjected to a series of temporal processing (TMTF, GDT & CMR-UCM/CM) and speech in noise test using a multichannel and channel-free hearing aid. Subsequently, they rated sound quality and hearing aid preferences. Objectively, the hearing aid signal output was acoustically analysed for modulation detection and gap detection tasks. In all the test, participants manifested equal performance with the tested devices except CMR-CM task where channel-free outperformed. Acoustic analysis showed evidence of spectral and temporal distortion in channel-free hearing aid, similar to multichannel hearing aids. Finally, channel free was the most preferred hearing aid by less experienced participants. All the measures indicated similar performance across the tested devices and complemented one another in their explanation of study findings. Faster gain adjustments of channel free across the frequency facilitated better-comodulated masking release than that achieved with MCC. Preference for the sound quality of the channel free was based on factors, usually subjective. Channel-free hearing aid depicted spectral and envelope distortion, like MCC.

摘要

比较通过无通道和多通道助听器的听觉障碍个体的时间处理技能和噪声下言语感知。一项准实验研究。21 名感觉神经性听力损失患者参与了这项研究。他们使用多通道和无通道助听器进行了一系列时间处理(TMTF、GDT 和 CMR-UCM/CM)和噪声下言语测试。随后,他们对音质和助听器偏好进行了评分。客观上,对助听器信号输出进行了调制检测和间隙检测任务的声学分析。在所有测试中,参与者在使用测试设备时表现出相同的性能,除了 CMR-CM 任务,在该任务中无通道表现优于多通道。声学分析表明无通道助听器存在频谱和时间失真的证据,与多通道助听器相似。最后,无通道是经验较少的参与者最偏好的助听器。所有措施表明,在测试设备中表现出相似的性能,并在解释研究结果方面相互补充。无通道在整个频率上更快的增益调整有助于比 MCC 实现更好的调制掩蔽释放。对无通道音质的偏好基于通常是主观的因素。无通道助听器描绘了频谱和包络失真,与 MCC 相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验