• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业保险女性产后宫内节育器和避孕植入物的费用分担和利用。

Cost Sharing and Utilization of Postpartum Intrauterine Devices and Contraceptive Implants Among Commercially Insured Women.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan Institute of Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2019 Nov-Dec;29(6):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2019.07.006
PMID:31495642
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cost sharing may impede postpartum contraceptive use. We evaluated the association between out-of-pocket costs and long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) insertion among commercially insured postpartum women.

METHODS

Using the Clinformatics Data Mart, we examined out-of-pocket costs for LARC insertions at 0 to 3 and 4-60 days postpartum among women in employer-sponsored health plans from 2013 to 2016. Patient costs were estimated by summing copayment, coinsurance, and deductible payments for LARC services (device + placement). Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between plan cost sharing for LARC services (at least one beneficiary with >$200 cost share) and LARC insertion by 60 days postpartum (yes/no).

RESULTS

We identified 396,073 deliveries among women in 51,797 employer-based plans. Overall, LARC placement by 60 days postpartum was observed after 5.2% (n = 20,604) of deliveries. Inpatient LARC insertion (n = 233; 0.06% of deliveries) was less common than outpatient LARC insertion (n = 20,375; 5.14% of deliveries). Cost sharing was observed in 23.4% of LARC insertions (inpatient IUD: median, $50.00; range, $0.93-5,055.91; inpatient implant: median, $11.91; range, $2.49-650.14; outpatient IUD: median, $25.00; range, $0.01-3,354.80; outpatient implant: median, $27.20; range, $0.18-2,444.01). Among 5,895 plans with at least one LARC insertion and after adjusting for patient age, poverty status, race/ethnicity, region, and plan type, women in plans with cost sharing of more than $200 demonstrated lower odds of LARC use by 60 days postpartum (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Cost sharing for postpartum LARC is associated with use, suggesting that out-of-pocket costs may impede LARC access for some commercially insured postpartum women. Reducing out-of-pocket costs for the most effective forms of contraception may increase use.

摘要

背景

自付费用可能会阻碍产后避孕措施的使用。我们评估了商业保险产后女性自付费用与长效可逆避孕(LARC)放置之间的关系。

方法

使用 Clinformatics 数据集市,我们检查了 2013 年至 2016 年期间雇主赞助健康计划中产后 0 至 3 天和 4-60 天内 LARC 插入的自付费用。通过汇总 LARC 服务(设备+放置)的共付额、自付额和免赔额来估计患者费用。多变量逻辑回归评估了 LARC 服务(至少有一名受益人的自付费用超过 200 美元)计划成本分担与产后 60 天内 LARC 放置(是/否)之间的关联。

结果

我们在 51797 个雇主基础计划中确定了 396073 例分娩。总体而言,产后 60 天内放置 LARC 的比例为 5.2%(n=20604)。住院 LARC 插入(n=233;占分娩的 0.06%)比门诊 LARC 插入(n=20375;占分娩的 5.14%)少见。在 23.4%的 LARC 放置中观察到费用分担(宫内节育器:中位数,50.00 美元;范围,0.93-5055.91 美元;宫内节育器:中位数,11.91 美元;范围,2.49-650.14 美元;门诊宫内节育器:中位数,25.00 美元;范围,0.01-3354.80 美元;门诊植入物:中位数,27.20 美元;范围,0.18-2444.01 美元)。在至少有一次 LARC 放置的 5895 个计划中,在调整了患者年龄、贫困状况、种族/民族、地区和计划类型后,自付费用超过 200 美元的女性产后 60 天内 LARC 使用的可能性较低(比值比,0.74;95%置信区间,0.71-0.77)。

结论

产后 LARC 的费用分担与使用相关,这表明自付费用可能会阻碍一些商业保险产后女性使用 LARC。降低最有效的避孕形式的自付费用可能会增加使用。

相似文献

1
Cost Sharing and Utilization of Postpartum Intrauterine Devices and Contraceptive Implants Among Commercially Insured Women.商业保险女性产后宫内节育器和避孕植入物的费用分担和利用。
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Nov-Dec;29(6):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
2
Cost sharing, postpartum contraceptive use, and short interpregnancy interval rates among commercially insured women.商业保险女性的成本分担、产后避孕措施使用和短孕期间隔率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;224(3):282.e1-282.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.109. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
3
The impact of out-of-pocket costs on the use of intrauterine contraception among women with employer-sponsored insurance.自付费用对有雇主保险的女性使用宫内节育器的影响。
Med Care. 2013 Nov;51(11):959-63. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a97b5d.
4
Factors Associated with New Uptake of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Since the Affordable Care Act Among Privately Insured Women in Pennsylvania.《平价医疗法案》实施后宾夕法尼亚州私人保险女性中长效可逆避孕措施新采用率的相关因素。
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Sep-Oct;29(5):370-375. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
5
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Contraceptive Use and Costs among Privately Insured Women.平价医疗法案对私人保险女性避孕措施使用和费用的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 May-Jun;28(3):219-223. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Factors associated with postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception.与产后使用长效可逆避孕措施相关的因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):43.e1-43.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
7
The impact of cost sharing on women's use of annual examinations and effective contraception.费用分担对女性进行年度体检和有效避孕的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):93.e1-93.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.051. Epub 2018 May 9.
8
Six- and twelve-month documented removal rates among women electing postpartum inpatient compared to delayed or interval contraceptive implant insertions after Medicaid payment reform.与医疗补助支付改革后延迟或间隔植入避孕植入物相比,选择产后住院的女性在6个月和12个月时有记录的取出率。
Contraception. 2017 Jan;95(1):71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
9
Implementing best practices for the provision of long-acting reversible contraception: a survey of obstetrician-gynecologists.实施长效可逆避孕措施的最佳实践:对妇产科医生的调查。
Contraception. 2019 Aug;100(2):123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.03.053. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
10
Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval in women who plan postpartum LARC: a retrospective study.计划产后长效可逆避孕方法的女性中与妊娠间隔短相关的因素:一项回顾性研究
Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):245-250. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Using national in vitro fertilization registries to validate clinical outcomes after in vitro fertilization covered by health insurance.利用国家体外受精登记处验证医疗保险覆盖的体外受精后的临床结局。
Fertil Steril. 2025 Jun;123(6):1029-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.12.015. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Incidence of new outpatient long-acting reversible contraceptive insertions among a commercially insured, US population from 2010 to 2020.2010年至2020年美国商业保险人群中新的门诊长效可逆避孕植入手术的发生率。
Contracept X. 2023 Sep 17;5:100101. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100101. eCollection 2023.
3
Utilisation, effectiveness, and safety of immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a systematic literature review.
产后即时宫内节育器放置的使用、效果和安全性:系统文献回顾。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Apr;49(2):e1. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201579. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
4
Feasibility and acceptability of a toolkit-based process to implement patient-centered, immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception services.基于工具包的实施以患者为中心的即时产后长效可逆避孕服务的可行性和可接受性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;226(3):394.e1-394.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Review of Insertion and Device Reimbursement Policies.即刻产后长效可逆避孕措施:置器和装置报销政策回顾。
Womens Health Issues. 2021 Nov-Dec;31(6):523-531. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
6
Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals.实施产后即时避孕:11家医院的比较案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Apr 12;2(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00136-7.
7
Champions in context: which attributes matter for change efforts in healthcare?背景下的冠军:哪些属性对医疗保健的变革努力重要?
Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01024-9.