Cho Min-Jeong, Halani Sameer H, Davis Justin, Zhang Andrew Y
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, USA.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, USA.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Jan;73(1):118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
With advances in microsurgery, the published success rate of microsurgical reconstruction by experienced microsurgeons is greater than 95%. However, it is unknown whether the training residents can produce similar results. At our county hospital, residents perform and lead all aspects of microsurgical reconstruction, from raising the flap to performing microanastomoses. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 156 consecutive microsurgical cases to determine the efficacy and safety of resident-led reconstructions at the county hospital.
We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent microsurgical reconstruction at the county hospital from 2016 to 2018. Demographic, surgical procedure, flap characteristics, resident levels, and complication data were collected.
Of the 156 free tissue flaps performed, the most commonly performed reconstruction was for the breast (62.8%), followed by lower extremity (15.9%), upper extremity (10.6%), head and neck (8.8%), and genitalia (1.8%). The average procedure time was 525.1 ± 149.2 min, and mean ischemia time for each flap was 69.8 ± 42.2 min. Venous anastomoses were performed by PGY3 (0.96%), PGY4 (27.9%), PGY5 (18.3%), and PGY6 (47.1%), while the arterial anastomoses were performed by PGY4 (16.4%), PGY5 (11.0%), and PGY6 (69.2%). The average number of anastomosis attempts was 1.3, with a range of 1 to 6. The overall flap success rate was 95.5% with a takeback rate of 7.1%.
In conclusion, our analysis shows that resident-led reconstruction can achieve similar microsurgical success as that of published outcomes. We believe resident-led microsurgical reconstruction can be safely performed, with as-needed faculty assistance in high-risk and complicated cases, while allowing resident education and maturation of technical and decision-making skills.
随着显微外科技术的进步,经验丰富的显微外科医生进行显微外科重建的已发表成功率超过95%。然而,尚不清楚接受培训的住院医师是否能取得类似的结果。在我们县医院,住院医师负责显微外科重建的各个方面,从掀起皮瓣到进行显微吻合。在本研究中,我们回顾性分析了连续156例显微外科病例的结果,以确定县医院住院医师主导的重建手术的疗效和安全性。
我们对2016年至2018年在县医院接受显微外科重建的患者进行了回顾性分析。收集了人口统计学、手术过程、皮瓣特征、住院医师级别和并发症数据。
在156例游离组织皮瓣手术中,最常见的重建部位是乳房(62.8%),其次是下肢(15.9%)、上肢(10.6%)、头颈部(8.8%)和生殖器(1.8%)。平均手术时间为525.1±149.2分钟,每个皮瓣的平均缺血时间为69.8±42.2分钟。静脉吻合由PGY3(0.96%)、PGY4(27.9%)、PGY5(18.3%)和PGY6(47.1%)完成,而动脉吻合由PGY4(16.4%)、PGY5(11.0%)和PGY6(69.2%)完成。平均吻合尝试次数为1.3次,范围为1至6次。皮瓣总体成功率为95.5%,回植率为7.1%。
总之,我们的分析表明,住院医师主导的重建手术可取得与已发表结果相似的显微外科手术成功率。我们认为,住院医师主导的显微外科重建手术可以安全进行,在高风险和复杂病例中可根据需要获得教员的协助,同时可让住院医师接受教育并使其技术和决策技能成熟。