Suppr超能文献

动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后的迟发性缺血性神经功能缺损

Delayed Ischemic Neurologic Deficit after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

作者信息

Yamaki Vitor Nagai, Cavalcanti Daniel Dutra, Figueiredo Eberval Gadelha

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Universidade De Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul-Sep;14(3):641-647. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_15_19.

Abstract

Delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND) is the main preventable cause of poor outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. Of 50% of survivors from a SAH, approximately 30% of patients will present clinical vasospasm (VS). The cornerstone of the DIND management comprises prevention and early identification. Several diagnostic methods have been proposed differing in efficacy, invasiveness, and costs. Serial neurological examination is the most reliable method to detect a new neurological deficit. On the other hand, comatose patients require advanced monitoring methods which identify changes in the microcirculatory environment, brain autoregulation, and spreading depolarization. Multimodality monitoring with continuous electroencephalography, microdialysis, and intracranial pressure monitoring represents altogether the current state-of-art technology for the intensive care of SAH patients. Moreover, advances in genetic biomarkers to predict clinical VS have shown consistent accuracy which may in the near future allow the early prediction of DIND through a simple blood test. Several clinical trials have tested drugs with theoretical effects on DIND prevention or treatment. Nevertheless, nimodipine remains the Holy Grail in the prevention of clinical VS. Among rescue therapies, the endovascular treatment through intra-arterial vasodilator (verapamil or nicardipine) infusion is the most employed method for DIND reversal; however, there is no good quality evidence comparing results of intra-arterial infusion of vasodilators versus balloon angioplasty. Although we have addressed the most refined technology in the management of SAH and DIND, the clinical experience and strict follow-up in neurointensive care will be determinant for favorable long-term outcomes.

摘要

迟发性缺血性神经功能缺损(DIND)是动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者预后不良的主要可预防原因。在SAH的幸存者中,约50%的患者中,约30%会出现临床血管痉挛(VS)。DIND管理的基石包括预防和早期识别。已经提出了几种诊断方法,它们在疗效、侵入性和成本方面存在差异。连续神经学检查是检测新的神经功能缺损最可靠的方法。另一方面,昏迷患者需要先进的监测方法来识别微循环环境、脑自动调节和扩散性去极化的变化。连续脑电图、微透析和颅内压监测的多模态监测共同代表了目前SAH患者重症监护的最先进技术。此外,预测临床VS的基因生物标志物的进展显示出一致的准确性,这可能在不久的将来通过简单的血液检测实现DIND的早期预测。几项临床试验已经测试了对DIND预防或治疗有理论作用的药物。然而,尼莫地平仍然是预防临床VS的圣杯。在抢救治疗中,通过动脉内输注血管扩张剂(维拉帕米或尼卡地平)进行血管内治疗是逆转DIND最常用的方法;然而,没有高质量的证据比较动脉内输注血管扩张剂与球囊血管成形术的结果。尽管我们已经探讨了SAH和DIND管理中最精细的技术,但神经重症监护中的临床经验和严格随访对于良好的长期预后将起决定性作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a3/6703066/a22239fa9530/AJNS-14-641-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验