Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Oct;50(8):858-871. doi: 10.1111/apt.15493. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
International guidelines recommend dysplasia surveillance in IBD.
To compare endoscopic techniques for dysplasia surveillance METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL for randomised trials through May 2019. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for binary and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes, using frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis. We assessed study risk of bias and appraised evidence certainty using GRADE.
Eighteen trials (2638 participants) were included. Standard definition white-light endoscopy (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.73; high certainty) and i-SCAN (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.90; moderate certainty) had lower odds of detecting neoplasia than chromoendoscopy. Fujinon intelligent colour enhancement (FICE), standard definition white-light endoscopy and i-SCAN had lower odds for this outcome than full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy (ORs 0.02 to 0.15; low certainty). Standard definition white-light endoscopy had lower odds of detecting nonpolypoid neoplasia than full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy, narrow band imaging, chromoendoscopy and high definition white-light endoscopy (ORs 0.01-0.14; moderate certainty). Full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy ranked as the best technique for both outcomes (moderate certainty). Standard definition white-light endoscopy had lower odds of detecting neoplasia by target biopsy (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.91) and had shorter procedure time (MD -14.81 minutes, 95% CI -25.03, -4.06) than chromoendoscopy (moderate certainty).
Chromoendoscopy, high definition white-light endoscopy, narrow band imaging, autofluorescence, FICE and full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy may be comparable for dysplasia surveillance. Standard definition white-light endoscopy and i-SCAN probably provide lower yields for neoplasia identification. Full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy may represent the first-line approach.
国际指南建议在 IBD 中进行发育异常监测。
比较用于发育异常监测的内镜技术。
我们通过 2019 年 5 月在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 中进行了随机试验搜索。我们使用固定效应网络荟萃分析估计了二项和连续结果的均数差 (MD) 的比值比 (OR)。我们使用 GRADE 评估了研究的偏倚风险和证据确定性。
纳入了 18 项试验(2638 名参与者)。标准定义白光内镜(OR 0.44,95%CI 0.26-0.73;高确定性)和 i-SCAN(OR 0.47,95%CI 0.25-0.90;中等确定性)检测到肿瘤的可能性低于 chromoendoscopy。Fujinon 智能彩色增强(FICE)、标准定义白光内镜和 i-SCAN 检测到该结果的可能性低于全谱高清白光内镜(OR 0.02 至 0.15;低确定性)。标准定义白光内镜检测非息肉样肿瘤的可能性低于全谱高清白光内镜、窄带成像、chromoendoscopy 和高清白光内镜(OR 0.01-0.14;中等确定性)。全谱高清白光内镜被认为是这两种结果的最佳技术(中等确定性)。标准定义白光内镜通过靶向活检检测到肿瘤的可能性较低(OR 0.27,95%CI 0.08-0.91),且手术时间较短(MD-14.81 分钟,95%CI-25.03,-4.06)比 chromoendoscopy(中等确定性)。
chromoendoscopy、高清白光内镜、窄带成像、自体荧光、FICE 和全谱高清白光内镜可能在发育异常监测方面具有可比性。标准定义白光内镜和 i-SCAN 可能对肿瘤识别的效果较低。全谱高清白光内镜可能代表一线方法。