Resende Ricardo Hannum, Ribeiro Igor Braga, de Moura Diogo Turiani Hourneaux, Galetti Facundo, Rocha Rodrigo Silva de Paula, Bernardo Wanderley Marques, Sakai Paulo, de Moura Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux
Department of Endoscopy of Clinics Hospital of São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2020 May;8(5):E578-E590. doi: 10.1055/a-1120-8376. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) have higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Guidelines recommend dysplasia surveillance with dye-spraying chromoendoscopy (DCE). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) available and compare the efficacy of different endoscopic methods of surveillance for dysplasia in patients with UC and CD. Databases searched were Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and SCIELO/LILACS. It was estimated the risk difference (RD) for dichotomous outcomes (number of patients diagnosed with one or more dysplastic lesions, total number of dysplastic lesions diagnosed and number of dysplastic lesions detected by targeted biopsies) and mean difference for continuous outcomes (procedure time). This study included 17 RCTs totaling 2,457 patients. There was superiority of DCE when compared to standard-definiton white light endoscopy (SD-WLE). When compared with high-definition (HD) WLE, no difference was observed in all outcomes (number of patients with dysplasia (RD 0.06; 95 % CI [-0.01, 0.13])). Comparing other techniques, no difference was observed between DCE and virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE - including narrow-band imaging [NBI], i-SCAN and flexible spectral imaging color enhancement), in all outcomes except procedure time (mean difference, 6.33 min; 95 % CI, 1.29, 11.33). DCE required a significantly longer procedure time compared with WLE (mean difference, 7.81 min; 95 % CI, 2.76, 12.86). We found that dye-spraying chromoendoscopy detected more patients and dysplastic lesions than SD-WLE. Although no difference was observed between DCE and HD-WLE or narrow-band imaging, the main outcomes favored numerically dye-spraying chromoendoscopy, except procedure time. Regarding i-SCAN, FICE and auto-fluorescence imaging, there is still not enough evidence to support or not their recommendation.
溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)患结直肠癌(CRC)的风险更高。指南建议采用染料喷洒染色内镜检查(DCE)进行发育异常监测。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是回顾所有可用的随机临床试验(RCT),并比较UC和CD患者中不同内镜监测方法对发育异常的疗效。检索的数据库有Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane和SCIELO/LILACS。对二分类结局(诊断为一个或多个发育异常病变的患者数量、诊断出的发育异常病变总数以及通过靶向活检检测到的发育异常病变数量)估计风险差异(RD),对连续结局(操作时间)估计平均差异。本研究纳入了17项RCT,共2457例患者。与标准清晰度白光内镜检查(SD-WLE)相比,DCE具有优势。与高清晰度(HD)WLE相比,在所有结局中均未观察到差异(发育异常患者数量的RD为0.06;95%CI[-0.01,0.13])。比较其他技术,除操作时间外,在所有结局中,DCE与虚拟染色内镜检查(VCE - 包括窄带成像[NBI]、i-SCAN和灵活光谱成像颜色增强)之间未观察到差异(平均差异为6.33分钟;95%CI为1.29,11.33)。与WLE相比,DCE所需的操作时间明显更长(平均差异为7.81分钟;95%CI为2.76,12.86)。我们发现,染料喷洒染色内镜检查比SD-WLE能检测到更多患者和发育异常病变。虽然在DCE与HD-WLE或窄带成像之间未观察到差异,但除操作时间外,主要结局在数值上更倾向于染料喷洒染色内镜检查。关于i-SCAN、FICE和自体荧光成像,仍没有足够的证据支持或不支持对它们的推荐。